AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and Intel Core i5-110 take fundamentally different paths to the same core and thread count, but the recorded benchmark data shows a clear separation in performance. The AMD part holds a significant advantage across the entire Cinebench suite, while the Intel chip’s only measurable edge in the database is its higher base clock and lower boost deficit.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 11,333 points. The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded score in this test, leaving the AMD processor as the only data point for direct comparison. However, the AMD chip’s percentile ranking of 80 versus the Intel part’s 50 indicates that the Ryzen AI 5 435 sits well above the median performance curve, while the Core i5-110 lands exactly at the midpoint of all CPUs in the database.

Single-core performance tells a similar story. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 posts a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,816, a figure that reflects the efficiency of its Zen 5 architecture. The Intel Core i5-110, built on the older Comet Lake design, does not have a recorded Cinebench R23 single-core number, but its lower boost clock of 4.30 GHz compared to the AMD chip’s 4.50 GHz suggests the gap would be substantial. In Cinebench R15, the AMD processor scores 1,686 multi-core and 260 single-core, again with no direct Intel counterpart in the database.

The PassMark suite provides the most complete picture for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, with 15 recorded results. The Intel Core i5-110 has zero benchmark entries in the database, so every comparison must rely on the AMD chip’s absolute scores and its position among all CPUs. The Ryzen AI 5 435 delivers a PassMark multi-thread score of 19,000, a single-thread score of 3,734, and an average benchmark score of 28,128. That average places it just 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-13490F, which posts an average score of 28,185, and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T at 28,065. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G both trail by 0.3%, with average scores of 28,054 and 28,032 respectively.

The data shows the Ryzen AI 5 435 is competitive with mid-range desktop chips from the previous generation despite being a mobile processor. Its PassMark data compression score of 225,374 and integer math score of 61,026 are strong indicators of general productivity performance, while the floating point math result of 40,627 and extended instructions score of 16,197 show solid compute capability for workloads that leverage SIMD and specialized instruction sets.

The Intel Core i5-110’s lack of benchmark entries means the database cannot provide a direct head-to-head score comparison. What the recorded data does show is that the AMD part’s performance profile is well-established across multiple test suites, and its percentile ranking of 80 places it in the upper fifth of all CPUs, while the Intel part’s 50th percentile ranking indicates a median performer that would likely trail in most compute-bound tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The AMD part also has a lower base clock of 2.00 GHz compared to the Intel chip’s 2.90 GHz.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and the Intel Core i5-110 feature 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has an average benchmark score of 28,128 across all recorded tests. The Intel Core i5-110 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 ranks in the 80th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-110 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-110 does not.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-110 supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and 42.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and Intel Core i5-110 are built on entirely different architectural foundations. The AMD part uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture, a 14 nm design fabricated by Intel itself.

The cache layouts diverge significantly. The AMD processor allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a total of 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 12 MB L3 cache. While the Intel part has three times the L3 capacity, the AMD design’s larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations reflect the different performance strategies of the two architectures.

The process node difference is substantial. TSMC’s 4 nm process gives the AMD chip a major density and efficiency advantage over Intel’s 14 nm node, which is several generations old. This helps explain the AMD part’s much lower 28 W TDP compared to the Intel chip’s 65 W TDP, despite the AMD processor’s higher boost clock and superior benchmark performance.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Radeon 840M, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses the UHD Graphics 630. The Radeon 840M represents a much more modern GPU design, though the database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either processor.

The AMD chip supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the Intel part supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes. The newer PCIe generation on the AMD side provides higher bandwidth per lane, which matters for storage and GPU connectivity.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on every major specification field in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel chip starts at a higher frequency, but the AMD chip has the higher ceiling.

The TDP figures are far apart. The AMD processor is rated at 28 W, while the Intel processor is rated at 65 W. This makes the AMD chip suitable for thin-and-light mobile systems, while the Intel part targets desktop platforms with higher cooling headroom.

The sockets are incompatible. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses Intel Socket 1200. The AMD part is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel part is classified as a desktop processor.

Memory support differs completely. The AMD chip uses DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel chip uses DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and 42.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD part’s memory bandwidth is more than double that of the Intel chip.

ECC memory support is present on the AMD processor but absent on the Intel processor. The AMD chip also has a different part number (100-000001337 versus SA35X) and a different release date: January 4, 2026 for the AMD part and September 10, 2025 for the Intel part. The Intel Core i5-110 has a launch MSRP of $200. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins in every area where the database contains performance measurements. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,333 and single-core score of 1,816 establish it as a capable performer for both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The PassMark suite reinforces this with strong scores across data compression (225,374), integer math (61,026), floating point math (40,627), and multi-thread performance (19,000). Its 80th percentile ranking places it well above the median CPU, and its average benchmark score of 28,128 is competitive with desktop processors like the Intel Core i5-13490F and Intel Core i5-14500T.

The AMD processor also wins on efficiency. Its 28 W TDP, combined with the 4 nm process node, means it delivers this performance at less than half the power envelope of the Intel chip. The memory bandwidth advantage, 89.6 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s, gives it a clear edge in memory-intensive workloads. The support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, plus ECC capability, makes it the more modern platform overall.

The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals in the database. Its strengths are structural rather than measured: a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz, a shared 12 MB L3 cache that is three times larger than the AMD chip’s 4 MB, and a desktop socket that allows for standard desktop cooling and expansion. The 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes offer more total lanes than the AMD chip’s 14 Gen 4 lanes, though the older PCIe generation reduces per-lane bandwidth. Its 65 W TDP suggests it is designed for systems where power draw is less constrained.

For mobile productivity and compute tasks, the data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435. For a desktop platform where the user might prioritize the larger L3 cache and higher base clock, the Intel Core i5-110 presents a conventional Comet Lake option, but the database contains no measurements to confirm any performance advantage. The recorded data shows the AMD part as the higher-performing and more efficient processor in every benchmarked category.