ATI Radeon HD 5570
AMD graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDATI Radeon HD 5570 Specifications
ATI Radeon HD 5570 GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The ATI Radeon HD 5570 GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the ATI Radeon HD 5570's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The ATI Radeon HD 5570 by AMD dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
AMD's ATI Radeon HD 5570 Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The ATI Radeon HD 5570's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
ATI Radeon HD 5570 by AMD Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the ATI Radeon HD 5570, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the ATI Radeon HD 5570 against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
TeraScale 2 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The ATI Radeon HD 5570 is built on AMD's TeraScale 2 architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the ATI Radeon HD 5570 will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
AMD's ATI Radeon HD 5570 Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the ATI Radeon HD 5570 determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the ATI Radeon HD 5570 to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
ATI Radeon HD 5570 by AMD Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the ATI Radeon HD 5570 are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
AMD API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the ATI Radeon HD 5570. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Product Information
Release and pricing details
The ATI Radeon HD 5570 is manufactured by AMD as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the ATI Radeon HD 5570 by AMD represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how ATI Radeon HD 5570 handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby PerformersAbout ATI Radeon HD 5570
Launched in February 2010 on TSMC’s 40 nm process, the ATI Radeon HD 5570 is a TeraScale 2 architecture part from AMD’s Evergreen generation, built around the Pinewood chip with 627 million transistors on a 104 mm² die. It carries 400 shading units, 20 texture mapping units, and 8 ROPs, paired with 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 51.20 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 3.2 Gbps effective. The card posts a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 1367, which places it at the 6th percentile among all GPUs, indicating a decidedly entry-level position in the modern benchmark landscape. This analysis interprets that score against its closest rivals and examines the feature set to determine realistic use cases.
Benchmark Performance
The ATI Radeon HD 5570’s sole benchmark result, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 1367, is modest by any contemporary standard. The 6th percentile ranking against all GPUs confirms that this is a part designed for basic computing tasks rather than demanding workloads. However, within its immediate competitive set, the performance picture is more nuanced, with the card landing in the middle of a tight cluster.
The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce 610M, scores 1383, which is just 1.2% higher than the HD 5570. This delta is within run-to-run variance for most OpenCL workloads, meaning the two parts are effectively interchangeable in raw compute performance. Similarly, the AMD Radeon HD 7670M scores 1400, a 2.4% advantage over the HD 5570. While technically ahead, this margin is so slim that it would be imperceptible in real-world applications; the HD 5570 essentially trades blows with these mobile-oriented parts despite being a desktop card.
The HD 5570 shows a clearer advantage over two other rivals. It outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M, which scores 1313, by a solid 4.1%. This is a measurable lead that would translate into slightly faster execution in compute-heavy tasks. More surprisingly, the HD 5570 also beats the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB, a professional workstation card, by 4.4% in this specific OpenCL test, as the RTX A2000 scores 1309. This result is likely an artifact of the test’s sensitivity to driver optimizations or the specific workload, but the data shows the HD 5570 holding a distinct edge over both of these competitors.
The performance data suggests that the HD 5570 was a competent entry-level part in its era, but its absolute score of 1367 is low. The 6th percentile ranking underscores that it is far outpaced by virtually all modern GPUs, including integrated graphics. The benchmark results indicate that its compute capabilities are roughly on par with low-end mobile GPUs from a later generation, but it lacks the architectural features that would allow it to scale with modern software demands. The card’s 500.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute and 12.50 GTexel/s texture fill rate are the raw hardware limits behind this score, and they remain fixed regardless of driver maturity.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The ATI Radeon HD 5570 does not include any dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores; its architecture, TeraScale 2, predates such hardware by nearly a decade. Consequently, it has no hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting, shadows, or reflections. Any ray-tracing workload would fall entirely on the 400 shading units, which are not designed for such calculations, resulting in impractically low frame rates even at minimal settings. The absence of tensor cores also means no hardware support for AI-accelerated features like DLSS or other neural network-based upscaling techniques.
The card’s feature set is defined by its API support, which is dated but functional for legacy software. It supports DirectX 11.2 (with a feature level of 11_0), which means it can run DirectX 11 titles, but it lacks the feature level 12 support required by modern games. OpenGL 4.4 is supported, allowing compatibility with a wide range of older applications and some current lightweight titles that still use this API. Critically, there is no Vulkan support listed in the data, which excludes it from a growing number of modern game engines and compute frameworks that rely on Vulkan for low-overhead performance.
The display outputs are limited to 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a, and 1x VGA. The HDMI 1.3a standard caps output at 1080p resolution with limited refresh rates, and there is no DisplayPort support, restricting multi-monitor setups to analog or older digital interfaces. The memory subsystem, while adequate for its time at 51.20 GB/s, is a bottleneck for higher resolutions and texture-heavy workloads. The 1024 MB frame buffer is also small by modern standards, causing texture thrashing in games that require more than 1 GB of VRAM. The card draws a modest 39 W TDP and requires no external power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 200 W, making it extremely easy to install in any system with a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot.
Who Should Consider It
Given the benchmark score of 1367 and the 6th percentile ranking, the HD 5570 is only suitable for very specific, low-demand scenarios. The data indicates that it is not viable for modern gaming at any resolution with acceptable frame rates. The 500.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for the compute requirements of contemporary game engines, and the lack of Vulkan support cuts off access to many optimized titles.
The primary use case for this card is legacy system repair or basic office productivity. For a machine running Windows 7 or older operating systems, the HD 5570 provides hardware acceleration for the Aero interface and plays 1080p video content smoothly via its 51.20 GB/s bandwidth. It can handle light 2D applications, spreadsheet work, and web browsing with older browsers that do not rely heavily on GPU acceleration. The card’s 39 W TDP and single-slot design make it a passive-friendly option for media center PCs (HTPCs) where low noise and power draw are priorities.
For gaming, the HD 5570 is limited to titles from its release era (circa 2010) at 720p or 1080p with low to medium settings. Games that are not GPU-intensive, such as 2D platformers, puzzle games, or older strategy titles, may run acceptably, but any 3D game from the last decade will likely struggle. The benchmark data shows it is 4.1% faster than the GT 520M, so it can match that card’s performance in compatible software, but that baseline is still extremely low. Users with modern expectations should not consider this card, as the 6th percentile score places it below virtually all integrated graphics solutions from the past five years.
FAQ
Q: Does the ATI Radeon HD 5570 support DirectX 12?
A: No. The card supports DirectX 11.2 with a feature level of 11_0, which does not include the features required for DirectX 12 titles.
Q: Can this card handle hardware ray tracing?
A: No. The HD 5570 has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores, so all ray tracing workloads would run on its 400 shading units, resulting in unusable performance.
Q: How does the HD 5570 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M?
A: The HD 5570 scores 1367 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 4.1% higher than the GT 520M’s score of 1313, indicating a moderate performance advantage.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the HD 5570?
A: The card has a 128-bit memory bus with GDDR5 memory running at 3.2 Gbps effective, providing a bandwidth of 51.20 GB/s.
Q: Is the HD 5570 suitable for modern gaming?
A: No. Its 6th percentile ranking and lack of Vulkan support make it unsuitable for modern games; it is only viable for very old or non-demanding titles.
Q: What power supply is recommended for this card?
A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, and the card itself has a 39 W TDP with no external power connectors required.
How It Compares
vs. NVIDIA GeForce 610M: The HD 5570 trails the 610M by a marginal 1.2% in OpenCL performance (1367 vs 1383). This difference is negligible in practice, placing both cards at essentially the same performance tier, though the HD 5570 offers a desktop form factor with more display outputs.
vs. AMD Radeon HD 7670M: The 7670M leads by 2.4% (1400 vs 1367), a slight but consistent advantage. Despite the HD 5570 being a desktop part, the mobile 7670M edges it out in raw compute, though the gap is small enough that driver optimizations could reverse the order in specific workloads.
vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M: The HD 5570 is 4.1% faster than the GT 520M (1367 vs 1313). This is the clearest win for the HD 5570 among its rivals, showing that it outperforms this low-end NVIDIA mobile chip by a measurable margin in compute tasks.
vs. NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB: Surprisingly, the HD 5570 beats the professional RTX A2000 by 4.4% in this specific OpenCL test (1367 vs 1309). This result is counterintuitive given the RTX A2000’s far higher transistor count and modern architecture, but the data shows the older card winning this particular benchmark, likely due to workload characteristics rather than overall capability.
The NVIDIA Equivalent of ATI Radeon HD 5570
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular ATI Radeon HD 5570 Comparisons
See how the ATI Radeon HD 5570 stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5570 with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs