GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores

1 GB
VRAM
MHz Boost
12W
TDP
64
Bus Width

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M Specifications

⚙️

GeForce GT 520M GPU Core

Shader units and compute resources

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.

Shading Units
48
Shaders
48
TMUs
8
ROPs
4
SM Count
1
⏱️

GT 520M Clock Speeds

GPU and memory frequencies

Clock speeds directly impact the GeForce GT 520M's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The GeForce GT 520M by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.

GPU Clock
600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz 1800 Mbps effective
Shader Clock
1200 MHz
GDDR GDDR 6X 6X

NVIDIA's GeForce GT 520M Memory

VRAM capacity and bandwidth

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The GeForce GT 520M's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.

Memory Size
1024 MB
VRAM
1,024 MB
Memory Type
DDR3
VRAM Type
DDR3
Memory Bus
64 bit
Bus Width
64-bit
Bandwidth
14.40 GB/s
💾

GeForce GT 520M by NVIDIA Cache

On-chip cache hierarchy

On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the GT 520M, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.

L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
128 KB
📈

GT 520M Theoretical Performance

Compute and fill rates

Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.

FP32 (Float)
115.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (Double)
9.600 GFLOPS (1:12)
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
🏗️

Fermi Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M is built on NVIDIA's Fermi architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the GT 520M will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.

Architecture
Fermi
GPU Name
GF108
Process Node
40 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
585 million
Die Size
116 mm²
Density
5.0M / mm²
🔌

NVIDIA's GeForce GT 520M Power & Thermal

TDP and power requirements

Power specifications for the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the GeForce GT 520M to maintain boost clocks without throttling.

TDP
12 W
TDP
12W
Power Connectors
None
📐

GeForce GT 520M by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity

Dimensions and outputs

Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.

Slot Width
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Display Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Display Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
🎮

NVIDIA API Support

Graphics and compute APIs

API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.

DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
CUDA
2.1
Shader Model
5.1
📦

GeForce GT 520M Product Information

Release and pricing details

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the GeForce GT 520M by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.

Manufacturer
NVIDIA
Release Date
Jan 2011
Production
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 400M
Successor
GeForce 600M

GeForce GT 520M Benchmark Scores

geekbench_openclSource

Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations.

geekbench_opencl #560 of 582
1,313
0%
Max: 380,114
Compare with other GPUs

About NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

might appeal if you’re chasing budget-friendly options, but does its 1GB DDR3 VRAM and Fermi architecture still justify the price tag? With a TDP of just 12W, it’s energy-efficient, yet its 2011 release date raises questions about real-world performance.
  1. Its low cost makes it tempting for basic tasks, but can it handle modern games or applications?
  2. The DDR3 memory type lags behind contemporary GDDR5/6, limiting bandwidth for data-heavy workloads.
  3. OpenCL scores of 1,313 are modest enough for light encoding but far from competitive in 2024.
  4. Fermi’s compute power shines in older software, but newer APIs will likely underperform.
  5. At 40nm, power efficiency is decent for laptops, but desktop users might want more raw power.
  6. Pair it with a low-end CPU to avoid bottlenecks, but don’t expect 1080p gaming at high settings.
Is this card a relic or a niche workhorse? Positioning the in 2024 feels like a challenge where does it fit in a market dominated by RDNA 3 and Ampere? It’s a relic for retro gaming or legacy systems, but can it coexist with modern hardware?
  1. Best suited for budget builds where graphical demands are minimal, like office work or streaming.
  2. Overclocking potential is near nonexistent, given its aging architecture and conservative power design.
  3. DDR3’s 1.5GHz speed pales next to GDDR6’s 14Gbps, making it ill-suited for 4K workflows.
  4. Its PCIe 2.0 x16 interface lacks the bandwidth to leverage faster storage solutions effectively.
  5. Competitors like the GT 710 offer similar pricing but better performance on newer drivers.
  6. Consider it only if you’re repurposing an old laptop or need a placeholder GPU for a HTPC.
Is this card worth resurrecting for your setup? Can the future-proof anything, or is it already obsolete? At 13 years old, it’s a time capsule useful for specific tasks but unlikely to adapt to upcoming tech.
  1. It lacks support for modern ray tracing or DLSS, rendering it irrelevant for next-gen gaming.
  2. DLA cores and tensor operations? Not here machine learning tasks will crawl at best.
  3. Even 1080p gaming at medium settings may require ultra-low details and low frame rates.
  4. VR readiness is a myth; latency and resolution demands will crush its capabilities.
  5. Its drivers are still supported, but NVIDIA’s focus shifts to newer architectures annually.
  6. Future-proofing? You’d need a time machine, not a GPU, to stay ahead in 2024.
Are you buying for nostalgia or practicality? Pairing the requires strategic thinking what components will it struggle to outpace? Building around it means accepting limitations but optimizing where possible.
  1. Team it with a Pentium G4560 or Ryzen 3 1200 to avoid CPU bottlenecks in light tasks.
  2. A 400W PSU is overkill, but ensure 12V rails are stable for reliable operation.
  3. Use an SSD for OS and games to offset the GPU’s sluggish data processing speeds.
  4. DDR3 RAM at 1600MHz balances cost and compatibility without overwhelming the GPU.
  5. A dual-fan cooler isn’t necessary its low TDP keeps temps manageable in most cases.
  6. Consider a 1080p 60Hz monitor to maximize resolution without stressing the hardware.
Will this combo satisfy your needs, or is it time to upgrade?

The AMD Equivalent of GeForce GT 520M

Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 480 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD • 8 GB VRAM

View Specs Compare

Popular NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M Comparisons

See how the GeForce GT 520M stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare GeForce GT 520M with Other GPUs

Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse GPUs