ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570

The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is a mobile graphics processor built on AMD's TeraScale 2 architecture, fabricated on a 40 nm process at TSMC. It is an end-of-life product from the Manhattan generation, featuring 400 shading units, 20 texture mapping units, and 8 ROPs, with a 1024 MB GDDR3 memory interface running on a 128-bit bus. Its benchmark presence is minimal, with a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 1186 placing it at the 4th percentile of all GPUs, indicating that it occupies a very low tier of performance in the current database landscape.

Benchmark Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 5570's sole benchmark result, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 1186, places it in a narrow competitive band where the differences between products are almost negligible. The data shows that it sits within a 1.5% performance envelope of its nearest rivals, making any ranking among them highly sensitive to driver versions or thermal conditions during testing. Against the ATI Radeon HD 5770, the Mobility HD 5570 trails by a mere 0.3%, which is a statistical tie given the measurement precision; the Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, and this difference would be imperceptible in real-world workloads.

The comparison to the AMD Radeon HD 7650M shows a similar story, with the 5570 lagging by 0.5% against a score of 1192. This places the two parts at virtual parity, suggesting that despite any architectural differences, their compute throughput in OpenCL tasks is effectively equivalent. Conversely, the Mobility HD 5570 holds a slight edge over the NVIDIA Quadro M600M, which scores 1179, giving the AMD part a 0.6% advantage. The most favorable comparison is against the AMD FirePro M2000, where the 5570 leads by 1.5%, with the FirePro posting a score of 1168.

What these numbers reveal is that the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is not a product defined by raw performance leadership but rather by its position in a tightly clustered group of entry-level mobile and professional parts. The 4th percentile ranking versus all GPUs underscores that this is a chip for basic acceleration, not for demanding compute tasks. In practical terms, the deltaPct values indicate that a user moving between any of these four GPUs would see no meaningful change in OpenCL benchmark scores; the performance class is identical, and the differences are within run-to-run variance. Therefore, the benchmark data positions the 5570 as a baseline performer whose primary attribute is consistency within its peer group rather than any distinct advantage.

Power and Cooling

The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 carries a TDP of 20 W, which classifies it as a very low-power part suitable for thin-and-light laptops or small form factor MXM modules. This figure is modest by any standard, and the data shows that thermal management should be straightforward for original equipment manufacturers, requiring only a basic cooling solution rather than an elaborate heat pipe assembly or active fan array. Because the slot width is defined as "MXM Module," the physical design is standardized for mobile implementations, meaning that the cooling solution is largely dictated by the laptop chassis design rather than the GPU itself.

The fact pack lists no power connector requirements and no suggested PSU wattage, which is consistent with a mobile component that draws power from the motherboard slot and is not intended for user-upgradeable desktop configurations. The absence of a suggested PSU figure indicates that this GPU is not sold as a standalone retail product for DIY builders, so power supply considerations are moot for its intended deployment. The 20 W TDP also implies that the total system power draw remains low, which is a critical factor for battery life in portable devices, although the benchmark database does not provide specific battery performance metrics.

For thermal design, the 40 nm process node and 627 million transistor count on a 104 mm² die size result in a transistor density of 6.0M per mm², which is modest by modern standards. This low density, combined with the low TDP, means that heat generation is minimal, and the GPU can likely be cooled passively in some chassis designs or with a single low-speed fan. The memory runs at 800 MHz with 1600 Mbps effective data rate, and the 25.60 GB/s bandwidth over a 128-bit bus does not contribute significant additional heat. Overall, the power and cooling profile of the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is one of efficiency and simplicity, with no exotic requirements.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

The Mobility Radeon HD 5570 does not include dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, as those fields are null in the specification data. This places it firmly in the pre-ray tracing era of GPU architecture, where such hardware acceleration was not yet a consideration for consumer or mobile parts. Consequently, any ray tracing workloads would have to be handled by the general-purpose shading units, which number 400, and the performance would be severely limited given the 440.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute throughput.

The feature set is instead defined by its API support, which includes DirectX 11.2 (11_0) and OpenGL 4.4. This means the GPU is capable of running applications built for those API versions, but it lacks Vulkan support entirely, as the Vulkan field is null. The DirectX 11.2 support at the 11_0 feature level indicates that it can handle tessellation and other DirectX 11 features, but it will not be compatible with titles that require DirectX 12 or the latest Vulkan renderers. For modern games, this is a significant limitation, as many recent releases mandate Vulkan or DirectX 12 for their rendering paths.

The pixel rate of 4.400 GPixel/s and texture rate of 11.00 GTexel/s provide the fundamental throughput for rasterization. These figures are low by contemporary standards, and they cap the GPU's ability to handle high resolutions or high-detail settings. The lack of tensor cores also means that any AI-accelerated features, such as DLSS or similar upscaling technologies, are not available. In summary, the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is a rasterization-focused GPU with legacy API support, offering no modern ray tracing or AI acceleration features, which aligns with its 2012 release date and low-end positioning.

Who Should Consider It

Given its 4th percentile ranking and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 1186, the Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is only suitable for basic computing tasks. Users who should consider this GPU are those running legacy applications that require DirectX 11.2 or OpenGL 4.4 support, such as older productivity software or light 2D workloads. For gaming, the 440.0 GFLOPS FP32 performance and 25.60 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest that it can handle very old titles at low resolutions and minimal settings, but it would struggle with any 3D game from the last decade.

The memory configuration of 1024 MB GDDR3 on a 128-bit bus is a further constraint, as it limits texture loading and frame buffer capacity. At 1080p resolution, the GPU would likely run out of memory bandwidth and capacity for any moderately demanding scene, so the realistic use case is 720p or lower with reduced texture quality. The 4.400 GPixel/s fill rate means that even at 720p, the pixel throughput is borderline for smooth frame rates in anything beyond simple 2D interfaces.

Professional users in the mobile workstation space might consider this GPU for basic CAD or spreadsheet acceleration, but the 1.5% advantage over the AMD FirePro M2000 is not a compelling reason to choose it. The lack of Vulkan support also disqualifies it from any modern compute or rendering pipelines that have moved beyond OpenGL. In essence, this GPU is for users who need a display output with some hardware acceleration for legacy software, not for anyone expecting playable frame rates or competitive compute performance. The data indicates that it is an entry-level part from a bygone era, and its suitability is limited to retro computing or basic office tasks.

How It Compares

Against the ATI Radeon HD 5770, the Mobility HD 5570 is effectively identical in performance, trailing by only 0.3% with scores of 1186 versus 1190. This is a remarkable parity given that the 5770 is a desktop part in the same family, but the benchmark data shows no meaningful difference in OpenCL compute. The 5570's lower TDP of 20 W versus an unspecified figure for the 5770 does not translate into a performance penalty in this specific test, making the two interchangeable in terms of raw score.

The comparison with the AMD Radeon HD 7650M shows the 5570 behind by 0.5%, with the 7650M scoring 1192. This is the largest deficit among the rivals, yet it is still within a rounding error. Both are mobile parts, and the data suggests that the 7650M has a slight architectural edge in OpenCL, but not enough to justify any preference in a real-world purchase decision. The deltaPct of -0.5% is negligible, and the two GPUs should be considered performance equals.

Against the NVIDIA Quadro M600M, the Mobility HD 5570 leads by 0.6%, with the Quadro scoring 1179. This is a minor victory for the AMD part, but it is worth noting that the Quadro is a professional-grade GPU with different driver optimizations. The 0.6% delta is within noise, so the ranking could easily flip with a different benchmark version or thermal state. Still, the data shows the 5570 holding a slight edge in this head-to-head.

The most favorable comparison is against the AMD FirePro M2000, where the Mobility HD 5570 is ahead by 1.5%, with the FirePro scoring 1168. This 1.5% delta is the largest among all rivals, yet it remains a small absolute difference of 18 points. The FirePro is a workstation part, and its lower score suggests that the 5570's consumer-oriented drivers or clock behavior give it a modest advantage in OpenCL compute. Even so, this margin would not be perceptible in any practical application, and the two GPUs share the same performance class.