Undisputed

# Undisputed with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc B570

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a fascinating study in balance and bottleneck behavior within Undisputed. The combo ranks 2986th out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third of all possible pairings for this title. However, the measured frame rates reveal a system that is far more capable at lower resolutions than its overall rank suggests, with a clear shift in performance characteristics as the graphical load increases. The data indicates a pairing where the CPU's substantial multi-threaded muscle (20 cores, 20 threads) and the GPU's mid-range rasterization capabilities (11.52 TFLOPS FP32) interact in ways that reward specific settings choices.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its 30 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (102.4 GB/s bandwidth) provide a robust foundation for feeding a discrete GPU. In the context of Undisputed, a sports title that typically scales well with core count for simulation logic, the 265K's parallel processing capabilities are substantial. The processor's multi-threaded benchmark scores reflect this strength: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 23085 place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

What is particularly revealing is the CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks. The data shows the 265K scoring an average benchmark score of 70879, which is just 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6511P (71051) and 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71370). Conversely, it edges out the Intel Core i7-14700KF by 1% (70163) and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F by 1.3% (69996). This tight clustering suggests that in pure computational throughput, the 265K is competitive with high-end server chips and slightly ahead of mainstream desktop rivals. For a game like Undisputed, this means the CPU is unlikely to be the primary constraint at lower resolutions, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential.

The single-thread performance is equally important for game logic and physics. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2020 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2713 indicate strong per-core efficiency, which is crucial for the primary game thread that handles player input, AI decision-making, and match state updates. The PassMark single-thread score of 4928 further confirms this capability. When the resolution is set to 1080p, the measured FPS at 195 (Low settings) versus 116 (High settings) suggests that the CPU can maintain high frame delivery even when the GPU is not heavily taxed. The data implies that the 265K is more than adequate for Undisputed's CPU demands, potentially leaving headroom for background tasks or streaming without impacting gameplay performance.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this combo for a high refresh rate experience?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 at Low settings delivers an average of 195 FPS, and at Medium settings it still achieves 141 FPS. This resolution and settings combination provides the highest frame rates, suitable for monitors with refresh rates up to 144Hz or beyond.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 89 at Low settings down to 34 at Ultra settings. The High preset yields 53 FPS, while Medium offers 64 FPS. For smooth 4K gameplay, Low or Medium settings are necessary, as the Ultra preset drops below 40 FPS.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B570 the limiting factor in this pairing?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the FPS scales dramatically with settings (195 Low vs 75 Ultra), indicating CPU headroom. At 4K, the FPS drops significantly across all settings, with Ultra falling to 34 FPS, which points to GPU-bound performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 70879, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon 6511P, 0.7% lower than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, 1% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700KF, and 1.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F.

Q: What is the expected FPS range at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the measured average FPS is 102, with a minimum of 86 and a maximum of 117. This provides a solid baseline for a 100Hz refresh rate monitor, with occasional dips below 90 FPS in demanding scenes.

Q: Does the game benefit from the CPU's high core count?

A: The 20-core/20-thread configuration likely helps maintain consistent frame delivery, as evidenced by the 1080p Low setting achieving 195 FPS. The CPU's multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35850) suggests it can handle complex game logic without bottlenecking the GPU.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data provides a clear gradient of performance across four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) at three resolutions. For the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers an average of 141 FPS with a minimum of 120, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense boxing exchanges. The High preset at the same resolution drops to 116 FPS, which is still playable but offers diminishing returns for the performance cost. At 2560x1440, Medium yields 102 FPS average (min 86, max 117), which is ideal for a 100Hz monitor, while High drops to 84 FPS. For 4K, Medium at 64 FPS is the highest playable option, though Low at 89 FPS is smoother if frame rate is prioritized over visual quality.

The Ultra preset is consistently the worst performer, with 75 FPS at 1080p, 54 FPS at 1440p, and only 34 FPS at 4K. These numbers suggest that Ultra settings impose a significant graphical load that the Arc B570 cannot sustain at higher resolutions. For players with 144Hz monitors, the Low preset at 1080p (195 FPS) or 1440p (141 FPS) offers the best chance of hitting high refresh rates without stutter. The data indicates that Medium is the recommended preset for most users, as it provides a 38% performance uplift over High at 1080p (141 vs 116 FPS) while maintaining acceptable visual quality. At 1440p, Medium is 21% faster than High (102 vs 84 FPS), and at 4K, Medium is 21% faster than High (64 vs 53 FPS). This consistent improvement makes Medium the most efficient choice across all resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo's rank of 2986 out of 3718 tested combinations places it in the 80th percentile from the bottom, meaning only about 20% of tested combos perform worse. This ranking is somewhat surprising given the CPU's high percentile (94th) among all processors. The disconnect suggests that the GPU, which sits in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, is the primary drag on overall performance. The Arc B570's average benchmark score of 20556 places it very close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, 0.1% difference) and the Intel Arc A750 (20582, -0.1% difference). This indicates that the B570 is a mid-range GPU that, while capable, cannot push frame rates into the upper echelons of the combo rankings.

The 3718 total combos in the database include many pairings with high-end graphics cards that achieve significantly higher FPS in Undisputed. The 265K's strong synthetic scores (e.g., PassMark multi-thread score of 58594) do not translate into a high game combo rank because the GPU fails to leverage that CPU power at higher settings. The data suggests that pairing this CPU with a stronger GPU would yield dramatically better results, as the CPU is clearly not the bottleneck at 1080p Low (195 FPS) where the GPU is lightly tasked. The rank of 2986 implies that users seeking top-tier performance in Undisputed would need a more powerful GPU, while the CPU itself is well-suited for the game's computational demands.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

Analyzing the FPS scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals a classic GPU-bound pattern. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 195 (1080p) to 141 (1440p) to 89 (4K), representing a 28% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 54% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This scaling is consistent with a GPU that is being progressively overwhelmed by pixel count. At Medium settings, the drop is from 141 FPS (1080p) to 102 FPS (1440p) to 64 FPS (4K), a 28% and 55% reduction respectively. The High settings show a similar trend: 116 FPS (1080p) to 84 FPS (1440p) to 53 FPS (4K), which is a 27% and 54% reduction.

The consistent ~28% drop from 1080p to 1440p and ~55% drop from 1080p to 4K across all settings strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see smaller FPS differences at lower resolutions, but the data shows that even at 1080p, the FPS scales significantly with settings (195 Low vs 75 Ultra), which is a GPU-driven behavior. The 4K Ultra result of 34 FPS is particularly telling, as it represents a 56% drop from 1080p Ultra (75 FPS), confirming that the Arc B570's rendering throughput (11.52 TFLOPS) is insufficient for high-fidelity 4K in this game. The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU has ample headroom, but as resolution increases, the GPU's fill rate and shading capabilities become the primary constraint.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

1920x1080: The measured average FPS values are 195 (Low), 141 (Medium), 116 (High), and 75 (Ultra). The Medium preset shows a minimum of 120 and a maximum of 162, indicating a stable frame delivery with only minor dips. The Low preset achieves the highest average, likely due to reduced pixel shading demands on the GPU. The Ultra preset's 75 FPS average represents a 62% reduction from Low, highlighting the significant cost of maxed-out graphical features.

2560x1440: At this resolution, the average FPS values are 141 (Low), 102 (Medium), 84 (High), and 54 (Ultra). The Medium preset records a minimum of 86 and a maximum of 117, providing a playable range for most monitors. The Low preset at 141 FPS is 38% faster than Medium, making it a viable option for 144Hz displays. The Ultra preset at 54 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that this setting is not recommended for smooth gameplay.

3840x2160: The 4K resolution yields the lowest performance: 89 FPS (Low), 64 FPS (Medium), 53 FPS (High), and 34 FPS (Ultra). The Medium preset shows a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 74, indicating some frame variability. The Low preset at 89 FPS is the only option that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS, while High and Ultra fall below playable thresholds for most users. The data shows a clear performance ceiling at 4K, with the GPU unable to maintain high frame rates even at reduced settings.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset consistently offers the best balance between visual quality and performance, with the 1080p Medium (141 FPS) and 1440p Medium (102 FPS) being particularly strong results. The Ultra preset is only viable at 1080p (75 FPS) and should be avoided at higher resolutions.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage) with a 5 nm process from TSMC. It features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). Its 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS places it in the mid-range segment, which aligns with its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

In Undisputed, the B570's VRAM capacity appears sufficient, as the game's settings do not seem to exceed 10 GB based on the measured FPS behavior. The GPU's 18 ray tracing cores are present but likely underutilized in this title, given that Undisputed is not a ray tracing-heavy game. The memory bandwidth of 380 GB/s is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results suggest that the GPU's raw compute power (11.52 TFLOPS) is the limiting factor rather than memory bandwidth. The Arc B570's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher score) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% lower score), indicating that it performs on par with these mid-range options.

The GPU's 150W TDP and dual-slot design make it a reasonable choice for mainstream systems, though the data shows that it struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra (34 FPS). The measured FPS pattern across resolutions indicates that the B570 is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Undisputed, where it can deliver smooth performance at Medium or High settings. At 4K, only Low settings (89 FPS) provide a consistently playable experience, suggesting that users with 4K displays should consider a more powerful GPU for this title.