Undisputed

# Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + Intel Arc B370

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a striking contrast in Undisputed: a capable eight-core CPU that ranks in the 78th percentile against all processors, combined with a GPU that sits at just the 5th percentile, yielding a combo that ranks 2592nd out of 2813 tested combinations. This pairing struggles mightily at higher resolutions, though the data reveals some surprising headroom at 1080p Low settings where the system delivers 115 FPS average.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Undisputed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 2592nd out of 2813 tested combos in this game, placing it near the bottom of the database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M. It edges out the AMD FirePro M2000 by 1.4%.

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves?

A: The highest recorded average is 115 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At the same resolution with Medium settings, it drops to 83 FPS average.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance look?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 scores 20,655 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 8,675 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 24,303. Its 3DMark 16-thread score is 6,628.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The only min FPS values recorded are at Medium settings: 32 FPS at 3840x2160, 51 FPS at 2560x1440, and 70 FPS at 1920x1080. Other settings rows lack min FPS data.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The Intel Arc B370 uses System Shared memory, with its memory size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared." Memory bandwidth is "System Dependent."

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on Intel's 3nm process. Its base clock runs at 300 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and it contains 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units. The GPU also features 10 ray tracing cores, though its FP32 throughput is a modest 6.144 TFLOPS.

The graphics card's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 places it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, which is remarkably low. The nearest rival comparison shows it bracketed by legacy ATI parts from over a decade ago: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192. This positions the Arc B370 as a decidedly entry-level graphics solution.

In Undisputed specifically, the GPU's limitations become immediately apparent. At 4K Ultra settings, the average FPS collapses to 20, which is effectively unplayable. Even at 1080p Ultra, the average is only 44 FPS. The lack of dedicated VRAM means the GPU must share system memory, and with bandwidth described as "System Dependent," performance can vary based on the rest of the platform. The pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s provide theoretical ceilings that the measured results suggest are rarely approached in demanding scenes.

The GPU's TDP of just 25 W tells a story of extreme efficiency but also extreme limitation. This is a part designed for minimal power draw, not for pushing high frame rates in modern sports titles. The data shows that Undisputed's rendering demands quickly overwhelm this iGPU as resolution and quality settings increase.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance cliff as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo delivers 68 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops that to 49 FPS, a reduction of roughly 28%. At 3840x2160 High, the average falls to 31 FPS, less than half of the 1080p figure.

Low settings show a similar pattern but with higher absolute numbers. The system achieves 115 FPS at 1080p Low, 83 FPS at 1440p Low, and 52 FPS at 4K Low. The 1080p to 1440p drop is about 28%, while the 1440p to 4K drop is about 37%. This scaling pattern suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as the CPU has plenty of headroom to feed frames.

Medium settings provide the only complete min/max data in the dataset. At 1080p Medium, the average is 83 FPS with min 70 and max 95. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 60 FPS with min 51 and max 69. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 38 FPS with min 32 and max 43. The min-to-max spread narrows at higher resolutions, indicating the GPU is becoming saturated and frame pacing becomes more consistent under load.

Ultra settings are punishing across the board. The system manages 44 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 32 FPS at 1440p Ultra, and just 20 FPS at 4K Ultra. The resolution scaling from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings shows a 55% performance loss, which aligns with the GPU being the bottleneck since the Ryzen 7 5700's eight cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for a sports title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2592 out of 2813 places it in the bottom 8% of all tested combinations in Undisputed. This poor standing is driven almost entirely by the GPU, since the CPU itself performs respectably in synthetic benchmarks. The Ryzen 7 5700 achieves a PassMark multithread score of 24,303 and a single-thread score of 3,296, with an average benchmark score of 25,517 across all tests.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER at 25,530 average score (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H at 25,550 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U at 25,485 (0.1% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U at 25,446 (0.3% behind). These margins are negligible, showing the Ryzen 7 5700 is a solid mid-pack performer.

The GPU tells a different story. With an average benchmark score of 1,184, the Arc B370 is nearly 21 times slower than the CPU in raw benchmark terms. Its nearest rivals are all legacy parts, and the 0.2% to 1.4% delta values show it's essentially in a dead heat with GPUs that are over a decade old. For Undisputed, this means the combo rank reflects the GPU's inability to handle modern rendering workloads rather than any CPU deficiency.

The gap between the CPU's 78th percentile ranking and the GPU's 5th percentile ranking creates a severe imbalance. The system is effectively a strong processor paired with a graphics solution that cannot leverage it, resulting in the low overall combo rank.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 brings substantial processing power to this pairing. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture (Cezanne codename), it operates at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosts to 4.60 GHz. The 7nm process from TSMC houses 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, with a 16 MB L3 cache and 512 KB L2 per core.

Synthetic benchmarks confirm the CPU's capability. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 20,655, while single-core reaches 2,916. Geekbench results show 9,959 multi-core and 1,907 single-core. The 3DMark suite reveals scaling from 901 single-thread to 6,617 max-thread scores, with 16-thread performance at 6,628. PassMark tests show strong integer math at 90,091 and floating point at 51,427.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role is to maintain frame pacing and handle game logic, physics, and AI. The measured FPS data suggests the CPU is never the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system produces 115 FPS average, which indicates the CPU can feed frames well beyond what the GPU can render at higher settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,296 in PassMark is particularly relevant for sports games, which often rely heavily on a few main threads.

The CPU's 65W TDP and DDR4 dual-channel memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate platform support. However, the PCIe Gen 3 interface with 20 lanes (CPU only) may limit data transfer to the GPU, though with a system-shared memory GPU, this becomes less relevant. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking across all CPUs shows it's a competent processor that deserves a better graphics partner.

Measured FPS Breakdown

3840x2160 (4K):

• Ultra: 20 FPS average
• High: 31 FPS average
• Medium: 38 FPS average (min 32, max 43)
• Low: 52 FPS average

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Ultra: 32 FPS average
• High: 49 FPS average
• Medium: 60 FPS average (min 51, max 69)
• Low: 83 FPS average

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Ultra: 44 FPS average
• High: 68 FPS average
• Medium: 83 FPS average (min 70, max 95)
• Low: 115 FPS average

The data shows a clear hierarchy across both resolution and settings. At 4K, even Low settings only achieve 52 FPS, which is borderline playable. The Medium settings at 4K show a min of 32 FPS, indicating occasional dips below smooth gameplay thresholds. At 1440p, Low settings achieve 83 FPS which is comfortable, while Medium hits exactly 60 FPS average with a min of 51. At 1080p, Low settings deliver 115 FPS, Medium delivers 83 FPS with a tight 70-95 range, and High delivers 68 FPS.

The only settings with min/max data are Medium across all three resolutions. The min-to-max spread at 1080p Medium is 25 FPS, at 1440p Medium it's 18 FPS, and at 4K Medium it's 11 FPS. This tightening spread at higher resolutions indicates the GPU is becoming the consistent limiting factor, with less variance as it operates near capacity.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS values, the optimal configuration depends on the target resolution and acceptable frame rates. At 1080p, Low settings provide the best experience with 115 FPS average, offering smooth gameplay that exceeds typical 60 FPS targets by a wide margin. Medium settings at 1080p deliver 83 FPS average with a 70 FPS minimum, which remains above the 60 FPS threshold and provides better visual quality.

For 1440p, Low settings at 83 FPS average are the best choice for smooth play, while Medium at 60 FPS average (min 51) sits right at the edge of acceptable performance. High settings at 1440p drop to 49 FPS, which may be tolerable for some but risks noticeable stutter. At 4K, Low settings at 52 FPS is the only configuration approaching playability, though it still falls short of a locked 60 FPS.

Ultra settings are not recommended at any resolution. The best Ultra result is 44 FPS at 1080p, which is below the 60 FPS standard for smooth gameplay. At 1440p Ultra, 32 FPS is marginal, and 4K Ultra at 20 FPS is effectively a slideshow. The data suggests that Medium settings at 1080p offer the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, providing 83 FPS average with a 70 FPS minimum that ensures consistent frame delivery. Players prioritizing frame rate over visuals should use Low at 1080p for the 115 FPS experience, while those with 1440p displays should stick to Low to maintain playable framerates.