Undisputed

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, and manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It runs a 3.00 GHz base clock and boosts up to 4.10 GHz. The chip's headline feature is its 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is unusually large for a desktop processor and directly benefits games that repeatedly access the same data sets — a category that includes sports simulations like Undisputed, where physics calculations and AI routines for boxer movement are often cache-resident.

The CPU sits at the 77th percentile of all processors in the database, with an average benchmark score of 24,709. Its 3DMark results show a clear scaling curve: 1,575 with 2 threads, 3,097 with 4 threads, 5,357 with 8 threads, and 6,755 at max threads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is modest (6,755 vs. 5,357, about 26%), which indicates that the additional threads beyond 8 provide some, but not transformative, headroom in threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 22,366 against a single-core score of 3,157 suggests a strong multi-threaded uplift from the 16 threads, though the single-thread result is not exceptional.

For Undisputed, the benchmark results at 1080p show that the CPU is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo delivers 115 FPS average; at 1080p High it drops to 68 FPS. That 41% reduction when moving from Low to High settings is driven by the GPU workload increasing, not the CPU. The 5700X3D's 16 threads and large L3 cache ensure that the game's simulation layer — which tracks fighter stamina, positioning, and punch physics — has ample processing headroom. The 3DMark max-threads score of 6,755 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,366 both indicate the processor can feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in this title.

The processor's nearest rivals in the database reinforce its positioning. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D scores 24,728, just 0.1% higher; the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24,822, 0.5% higher; the Intel Core i5-12450HX scores 24,576, 0.5% lower; and the Intel Core i5-11600 scores 24,563, 0.6% lower. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, meaning the 5700X3D is effectively performance-matched with a broad set of mid-range and previous-generation high-end chips in synthetic workloads. In a game like Undisputed, where the frame rate at 1440p and 4K is heavily GPU-bound, this CPU's performance class is more than adequate.

FAQ

*Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D strong enough for Undisputed at high frame rates?*

A: Yes. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 115 FPS average, and at 1080p Medium it still holds 83 FPS. The processor's 16 threads and 96 MB L3 cache provide sufficient compute for the game's simulation, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Q: How does the 5700X3D compare to its closest rivals in overall CPU performance?

A: The 5700X3D has an average benchmark score of 24,709. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D is 0.1% higher, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is 0.5% higher, the Intel Core i5-12450HX is 0.5% lower, and the Intel Core i5-11600 is 0.6% lower. All four chips are effectively tied in aggregate performance.

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this combo for a smooth experience?*

A: At 1080p, the combo delivers 68 FPS on High and 44 FPS on Ultra. At 1440p, High produces 49 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS target, 1080p High (68 FPS) is the safest option, while 1440p Medium hits exactly 60 FPS average.

*Q: Does the Intel Arc B370's performance limit this combo in Undisputed?*

A: The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,184, placing it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals — the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and AMD FirePro M2000 — are all within a 1.4% delta, indicating the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher settings and resolutions.

*Q: How does the combo rank among all tested combinations in Undisputed?*

A: The combo ranks 2,592 out of 2,813 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 8% of all combos. This low rank is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's 5th-percentile standing, not the CPU.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K in Undisputed?*

A: At 4K, the combo manages 52 FPS on Low, 38 FPS on Medium, 31 FPS on High, and 20 FPS on Ultra. Only the Low preset is playable at 4K, and even that is marginal; Medium is borderline with a 38 FPS average and a 32 FPS minimum.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested CPU/GPU combinations for Undisputed, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D with the Intel Arc B370 ranks 2,592 out of 2,813 combos. That places it in the bottom 8% of tested systems, which is a sobering statistic when viewed in isolation. However, the ranking is almost entirely a function of the GPU's position in the hardware hierarchy rather than the CPU's.

The Intel Arc B370 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,184, which puts it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1,186, 0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1,190, 0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1,192, 0.7% higher), and the AMD FirePro M2000 (1,168, 1.4% lower). These deltas show the Arc B370 is clustered with integrated and entry-level discrete GPUs from over a decade ago in raw 3DMark performance.

The CPU, by contrast, is a solid mid-range part. The 5700X3D's 77th-percentile standing and its near-tie with the Ryzen 5 7600X3D, Ryzen 9 5900HX, Core i5-12450HX, and Core i5-11600 (all within 0.6%) mean the processor is not the weak link. In Undisputed, the combo rank reflects that the GPU is the constraint. The measured frame rates confirm this: at 1080p Low, the combo hits 115 FPS, which is a playable number, but at 1080p Ultra it falls to 44 FPS, a 62% drop that scales directly with GPU load. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would remain more constant across settings at a fixed resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data covers four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) across three resolutions (1080p, 1440p, 4K), providing a full picture of the combo's behavior.

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its best results. Low settings yield 115 FPS average. Medium drops to 83 FPS average with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 95. High yields 68 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 44 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is a 71 FPS difference, or about 62%.

At 2560x1440, the numbers step down. Low produces 83 FPS average. Medium hits 60 FPS average, with a minimum of 51 and a maximum of 69 — a tight band that indicates consistent frame pacing. High drops to 49 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 32 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 51 FPS, or about 61%.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles. Low yields 52 FPS average. Medium drops to 38 FPS average, with a minimum of 32 and a maximum of 43. High falls to 31 FPS average, and Ultra bottoms out at 20 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 32 FPS, or about 62%.

The pattern is consistent: moving from Low to Ultra at any resolution removes roughly 60-62% of the frame rate. This uniformity across resolutions indicates that the GPU's performance ceiling is being hit at every preset, and the CPU is not introducing variable overhead.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the combo delivers 115 FPS at 1080p, 83 FPS at 1440p, and 52 FPS at 4K. That is a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 55% drop from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the numbers are 68 FPS (1080p), 49 FPS (1440p), and 31 FPS (4K) — a 28% drop to 1440p and a 54% drop to 4K. At Medium, 83 FPS at 1080p becomes 60 FPS at 1440p (28% drop) and 38 FPS at 4K (54% drop). At Ultra, 44 FPS at 1080p drops to 32 FPS at 1440p (27% drop) and 20 FPS at 4K (55% drop).

The consistency of these percentage drops across all four presets is the key signal. A CPU-bound system would show smaller percentage drops when moving to higher resolutions, because the CPU work stays constant while the GPU work increases. Here, the frame rate scales almost exactly with pixel count, which means the Intel Arc B370 is the limiting component at every resolution. The 5700X3D is not being stressed; its 96 MB L3 cache and 16 threads provide enough headroom that the GPU's pixel throughput dictates the frame rate.

The practical implication is that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming. At 1440p, only Low (83 FPS) and Medium (60 FPS) are playable, and at 4K, only Low (52 FPS) approaches a smooth experience. The 55% frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K at every preset confirms that upgrading the GPU would yield proportionally larger gains than upgrading the CPU, which is already in a strong performance class relative to its rivals.

Settings Recommendations

For a smooth experience in Undisputed, the data points to 1080p as the primary resolution for this combo. At 1080p Medium, the combo delivers 83 FPS average with a minimum of 70 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for a responsive fighting game. The minimum frame rate of 70 FPS indicates that even in demanding moments — such as close-up exchanges or crowd-heavy scenes — the frame rate does not dip below playable levels.

If visual fidelity is a priority, 1080p High at 68 FPS average is a reasonable trade-off. The 15 FPS drop from Medium to High is noticeable, and the minimum frame rate is not recorded, but the average remains above 60 FPS. Ultra at 1080p (44 FPS) is not recommended, as it falls below the smoothness threshold and the visual gains over High are typically marginal in sports titles.

At 1440p, Medium is the only setting that hits 60 FPS exactly, with a minimum of 51 FPS. That minimum is borderline — dips to 51 FPS during intense animations could be perceptible. 1440p Low at 83 FPS is the safer choice if the resolution is a priority, as it provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. 1440p High (49 FPS) and Ultra (32 FPS) are not advisable for competitive play.

At 4K, the combo is not well-suited. Low at 52 FPS is the only preset that stays above 30 FPS, and even that is marginal for a game that benefits from consistent frame pacing. Medium (38 FPS) and High (31 FPS) are playable only on displays with variable refresh rate support, and Ultra (20 FPS) is effectively a slideshow.

The best experience per the measured rows is 1080p Medium. It provides an 83 FPS average, a 70 FPS minimum, and a 95 FPS maximum, which means the frame rate never drops below the 60 FPS target and often exceeds it. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and large cache ensure that the game's simulation runs smoothly, while the GPU's 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for this preset. For users who prefer 1440p, Low settings (83 FPS) offer the same average frame rate as 1080p Medium, making it a viable alternative if the resolution is more important than visual detail.