Undisputed

Undisputed, the boxing sim from 2023, presents a demanding workload for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B390 combination. The measured data reveals a system that is consistently bound by the graphics processor, with the CPU's eight-core architecture providing ample headroom for the game's simulation logic. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy of performance scaling across resolutions and settings, painting a picture of a pairing that can manage playable frame rates at lower tiers but struggles to maintain smoothness at the highest visual presets. The data indicates that the Intel Arc B390, with its integrated graphics design, is the primary limiting factor in this configuration.

Resolution Scaling

The most telling aspect of this data is how average frame rates collapse as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 127 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 92 FPS, a 27.6% reduction in performance. The jump to 4K Low further reduces the average to 58 FPS, which is a 36.9% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep decline suggests that the rendering pipeline is becoming saturated, a classic sign of a GPU that is running out of pixel-pushing capacity.

The scaling pattern holds across other settings. With High settings, the average FPS goes from 76 at 1080p to 55 at 1440p (a 27.6% drop) and then to 35 at 4K (a 36.4% drop from 1440p). This consistent proportional decrease in performance as pixel count rises points directly at the graphics hardware as the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see a more pronounced difference between 1080p and 1440p, with the gap narrowing as the resolution increases and the GPU load grows. The data shows the opposite; the performance penalty for each resolution step is substantial, indicating that the Intel Arc B390’s limited shading units and texture rate are being overwhelmed.

The data implies that the system’s performance ceiling is tied directly to the GPU's fill rate and pixel throughput. The Intel Arc B390, with its 24 ROPs and a pixel rate of 60.00 GPixel/s, is simply not equipped to handle the massive pixel counts of 4K UHD. The jump from 1440p to 4K is particularly punishing, with performance nearly halving in most cases. This is a decisive indicator that for this game, the resolution is the single most critical factor in determining playability, and the combination's ability to deliver a smooth experience is heavily contingent on staying at lower resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 presents a stark contrast to the GPU's limitations. Its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and a single-core score of 2916, suggest a processor with significant compute headroom for a sports title like Undisputed. The 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture are likely more than sufficient to handle the game's physics, AI, and game logic. The data shows that the CPU's performance percentile is in the 78th rank against all CPUs, indicating it is a solidly performing part. This is a CPU that should not be the primary source of frame rate bottlenecks in this scenario.

The CPU's high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Geekbench multi-core score of 9959 and a Passmark multithread score of 24303, means it can handle the background tasks and game simulation without breaking a sweat. Even at 1080p Low, where the CPU's role is often more critical to hit high frame rates, the system still achieves 127 FPS. This indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding frames to the GPU faster than the GPU can render them, confirming that the graphics card is the constraining component. The single-thread performance, a key metric for game engines, is also robust with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2916, ensuring that the main game thread is unlikely to stall the pipeline.

The fact that frame rates drop so significantly at higher resolutions, where the CPU's workload per frame is relatively unchanged, is the most compelling evidence of the CPU's secondary role. The performance delta between 1080p and 4K is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's inability to keep pace with the rendering demands. The Ryzen 7 5700 is a capable partner, providing a stable platform, but it is not the star of the show in this pairing. Its performance is more than adequate to support the Arc B390, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's architectural limitations in this specific title.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination capable of hitting 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: No. The measured data shows that at 4K with Low settings, the average frame rate is 58 FPS. At Medium settings, it drops to 42 FPS, and at High and Ultra, it falls to 35 FPS and 22 FPS, respectively. The data indicates that a consistent 60 FPS at 4K is not achievable with this hardware.

Q: What is the best resolution for a smooth 60 FPS experience?

A: The benchmark results show that 1080p is the only resolution where the system consistently exceeds 60 FPS. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 127 FPS, Medium averages 91 FPS, and High averages 76 FPS. Even the Ultra preset, while averaging 49 FPS, is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Ultra preset perform compared to High at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, the Ultra preset averages 35 FPS, which is 20 FPS lower than the High preset's 55 FPS average. This represents a significant 36.4% performance drop for the visual upgrade that the Ultra preset provides.

Q: Does the CPU become a bottleneck at lower resolutions?

A: The data suggests not. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 127 FPS, which is a very high frame rate. If the CPU were a limiting factor, we would expect to see performance plateau at lower resolutions, but the frame rates continue to be high, indicating the CPU is keeping up with the GPU's output.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Medium presets at 1080p?

A: The Low preset averages 127 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 91 FPS. This is a 36 FPS difference, or a 28.3% decrease in average frame rate when moving from Low to Medium settings.

Q: Given the GPU's low percentile ranking, is it the primary performance limiter?

A: Yes. The Intel Arc B390's average benchmark score of 1482 places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. This is exceptionally low, and the measured FPS data, which shows significant drops with resolution increases, aligns with the conclusion that the GPU is the definitive bottleneck in this system.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested configurations for Undisputed, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B390 secures a specific and somewhat lowly position. The combo rank is 3304 out of 3718 tested combinations. This data places it in the bottom 11.1% of all systems tested for this game. This ranking is a direct reflection of the GPU's performance, which is in the 9th percentile against all GPUs, rather than the CPU, which is in the 78th percentile against all CPUs.

This vast discrepancy between the CPU's relative strength and the GPU's weakness is the defining characteristic of this combo. The Ryzen 7 5700 is a mid-to-high-range processor that is being held back by a graphics solution that is clearly not designed for high-end gaming. The ranking suggests that the vast majority of other tested combinations, likely featuring dedicated graphics cards, are capable of delivering a superior experience in Undisputed. The data implies that this configuration would be an outlier for gaming, as most systems in this rank are likely integrated graphics solutions or very old dedicated GPUs.

The performance gap to the top is immense, but the ranking also shows that there are over 400 tested combos that perform worse. This means the combo is not the absolute bottom, but it is firmly in the lower echelon. The results indicate that for a smooth and visually rich experience in this game, a different GPU would be necessary. The CPU has the potential to support a much more powerful graphics card, but as it stands, this pairing's overall rank is dictated by the Arc B390's limitations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset provides a comprehensive look at the performance across various settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system shows its best performance. The Low preset delivers an average of 127 FPS. The Medium preset averages 91 FPS, with a minimum of 78 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS. The High preset averages 76 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with an average of 49 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates take a significant hit. The Low preset averages 92 FPS. The Medium preset averages 66 FPS, with a minimum of 56 FPS and a maximum of 76 FPS. The High preset averages 55 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 35 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth, consistent playability.

At 3840x2160, the performance is heavily constrained. The Low preset averages 58 FPS. The Medium preset averages 42 FPS, with a minimum of 36 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. The High preset averages 35 FPS. The Ultra preset averages just 22 FPS. These numbers confirm that 4K gaming is only viable on the Low preset, and even then, it barely holds a 60 FPS average.

The data shows a clear pattern: each step up in resolution or settings results in a substantial loss in average frame rates. The minimum FPS figures at Medium settings also show that there is some variation in frame times, with the 1% lows being noticeably lower than the average, which could lead to occasional stutter. The overall picture is one of a system that is capable at 1080p but is quickly overwhelmed by higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings for this combination prioritize resolution and preset to achieve a playable frame rate. For a standard 60 FPS target, the only viable options are at 1080p. The High preset, with an average of 76 FPS, offers a good balance of visual quality and performance. The Medium preset at 1080p, with an average of 91 FPS, provides a smoother experience and more headroom for dips, making it a safer choice for consistent performance.

If the user has a 1440p monitor, the data suggests that the Low preset, with an average of 92 FPS, is the only setting that consistently stays above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 66 FPS, which is technically above 60 but leaves little room for error during intense gameplay moments. The High preset, at 55 FPS, is likely not smooth enough for a responsive experience.

For 4K displays, the data is clear: the Low preset, with an average of 58 FPS, is the only acceptable starting point, and it is borderline. The Medium preset at 4K, with an average of 42 FPS, will feel sluggish. The Ultra preset should be avoided at all resolutions, as it consistently produces the lowest frame rates, often dipping to unplayable levels. The best experience, according to the data, is to play at 1080p with either Medium or High settings, depending on whether frame rate stability or visual fidelity is the higher priority. The data indicates that sacrificing visual quality for a higher and more stable frame rate is the recommended path with this hardware.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the decisive factor in this system's performance. Its specifications, including a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, are paired with a very limited set of resources: 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and only 24 ROPs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark score of 1482 places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. This is an exceptionally low score, indicating a fundamental lack of raw graphics processing power. Its nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and GT 625 OEM, are ancient, low-end parts, which contextualizes its performance tier.

The GPU's memory configuration is "System Shared," which means it relies on the main system memory for its frame buffer. This is a significant architectural constraint, as it shares bandwidth with the CPU. The bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which on a dual-channel DDR4 platform is limited compared to a dedicated VRAM solution. This shared memory setup likely contributes to the performance drop-off at higher resolutions, where the demand for memory bandwidth to feed the pixel pipeline increases dramatically. The GPU's FP32 performance is rated at 7.680 TFLOPS, but this theoretical number is clearly not translating into real-world gaming performance due to the other bottlenecks.

The data shows that this GPU is the sole reason for the low frame rates in Undisputed. The CPU is capable of delivering high performance, but it is being starved by the GPU's inability to render frames quickly. The GPU's low ROP count is a likely culprit for the poor 4K performance, as this component is directly responsible for pixel output. The 60.00 GPixel/s pixel rate is insufficient for the pixel counts required at 4K. In summary, the Intel Arc B390 is a graphics processor that is fundamentally mismatched for this game at higher settings, and its performance is the primary limiting factor for the entire system.