Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 delivers a highly responsive boxing simulation experience in Undisputed, with frame rates that scale predictably across the three primary resolutions. The data indicates that this combination is well-balanced, though the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher settings and resolutions. The measured results show a system capable of high refresh rate play at 1080p and solid 60fps performance at 1440p with appropriate settings, while 4K remains a challenge for the most demanding presets.

Resolution Scaling

The performance deltas between resolutions reveal where the bottleneck lies in this configuration. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average frame rate drops from 127.1 FPS to 90.9 FPS, a reduction of approximately 28.5%. This scaling is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, as the pixel count increases by roughly 78%, yet the frame rate impact is less than proportional, suggesting the CPU still has headroom to feed the graphics card.

The jump from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at High settings is more severe, with the average falling from 90.9 FPS to 55.1 FPS, a 39.4% decline. At 4K, the RX 6600’s 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become the limiting factors, as the rendering load outpaces the GPU’s compute capabilities. The data shows that at Ultra settings, the 4K result of 38 FPS is only 45.8% of the 1440p Ultra score of 60.9 FPS, indicating that the highest preset pushes the card to its absolute limits at this resolution.

At Low settings, the scaling is more linear. The 1080p Low result of 207.6 FPS drops to 154.9 FPS at 1440p, a 25.4% decrease, and then to 93.5 FPS at 4K, another 39.6% drop. This pattern confirms that even at the lowest visual load, the RX 6600 remains the primary determinant of frame rate, as the Ryzen 5 7600’s six Zen 4 cores with a 5.10 GHz boost clock are sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s output across all tested scenarios. The 4K Low result of 93.5 FPS is particularly telling, as it shows the card can deliver playable performance at 4K only when the visual fidelity is substantially reduced.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows provide a clear hierarchy of performance across the four presets. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers 151.2 FPS, which is 18.9% higher than the High preset’s 127.1 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to 83 FPS, a 34.7% reduction from Medium. For competitive play or high refresh rate displays, the Medium preset is the optimal choice at 1080p, as it offers a substantial frame rate advantage over High and Ultra while maintaining a visually acceptable level of detail.

At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves 90.9 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while the Medium preset reaches 109.4 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution produces 60.9 FPS, just barely clearing the 60 FPS mark. The data suggests that High is the sweet spot for 1440p, providing a balance between visual quality and performance, with Medium as a viable alternative for users who prioritize frame rate stability over graphical fidelity.

For 3840x2160, the results are more constrained. The High preset yields 55.1 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS target but still playable, while the Medium preset reaches 71 FPS, offering a more comfortable margin. The Low preset at 93.5 FPS is the only configuration at 4K that provides a consistently fluid experience. The Ultra preset at 38 FPS is not recommended for serious play, as the frame rate drops below the threshold for responsive combat gameplay. Based on the data, Medium at 4K, High at 1440p, and Medium or High at 1080p are the recommended presets for the best experience per the measured rows.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a Navi 23 chip, plays a central role in determining the frame rates observed. The card’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a limiting factor at 4K with high detail settings. The GPU’s boost clock of 2491 MHz and game clock of 2044 MHz allow it to sustain high throughput, but the 1792 shading units must process an increasing number of pixels as resolution scales.

The data shows that the GPU is the dominant component in Undisputed, as the frame rate differences between presets are consistent with the card’s compute capabilities. At 1080p Low, the card achieves 207.6 FPS, which is a strong result for a GPU that sits in the 69th percentile of all GPUs according to benchmark scores. However, at 4K Ultra, the frame rate collapses to 38 FPS, a 81.7% reduction from the 1080p Low score, illustrating how the card’s limits are exposed by the combination of high resolution and maximum settings.

The VRAM capacity of 8 GB is adequate for this game at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K Ultra result suggests that memory pressure may contribute to the performance decline. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 890M with a deltaPct of 0, the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with a deltaPct of -0.2, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700M with a deltaPct of 0.2. These comparisons indicate that the RX 6600 performs as expected for its class, and the measured FPS in Undisputed aligns with its overall benchmark standing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete set of measured results provides a detailed picture of performance across all configurations. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 207.6 FPS at Low, 151.2 FPS at Medium, 127.1 FPS at High, and 83 FPS at Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decline, with each step up in settings costing approximately 24-56 FPS. The 1080p results demonstrate that this combo is capable of high refresh rate gaming, with even the Ultra preset exceeding 80 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are 154.9 FPS at Low, 109.4 FPS at Medium, 90.9 FPS at High, and 60.9 FPS at Ultra. The 1440p results show a similar pattern to 1080p, but with a compressed range, as the Ultra preset just barely maintains 60 FPS. The Low preset at 154.9 FPS is particularly notable, as it remains above the 144 Hz refresh rate threshold, making it suitable for high refresh rate monitors at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 93.5 FPS at Low, 71 FPS at Medium, 55.1 FPS at High, and 38 FPS at Ultra. The 4K results reveal the GPU’s limitations, as only the Low preset exceeds 90 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls below 40 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 55.5 FPS, which is the largest spread of any resolution, indicating that the visual settings have a disproportionate impact at this resolution due to the pixel rendering load.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 ranks 1260 out of 1580 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the 20.2nd percentile of all configurations. This ranking reflects the GPU’s position as a mid-range component, as the CPU is more capable than the graphics card in this pairing. The Ryzen 5 7600’s average benchmark score of 26617 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with a deltaPct of 0.2, the Intel Core i9-12900HK with a deltaPct of -0.2, and the AMD EPYC 8024P with a deltaPct of 0.2.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 25235 places it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon 890M with a deltaPct of 0, the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with a deltaPct of -0.2, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with a deltaPct of 0.5. The disparity between the CPU’s high ranking and the GPU’s mid-range position suggests that the combo’s overall rank in Undisputed is primarily determined by the graphics card’s performance ceiling. The measured FPS data supports this conclusion, as the system delivers strong 1080p results but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with the most demanding presets.

In the context of the 1580 combos tested, this pairing is positioned as a capable but not top-tier setup. The 1260th rank indicates that there are 320 configurations that perform better, likely featuring more powerful GPUs. The data shows that this combo is well-suited for 1080p gaming with high settings and 1440p gaming with medium to high settings, but it falls behind in the 4K Ultra category where higher-end graphics cards excel.