Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a study in asymmetry for Undisputed. The data shows a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 2 processor from the 4000 series, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, operating within a 65 W TDP. This CPU, built on the 7 nm process with an 8 MB shared L3 cache, is firmly a mid-range part from 2020. In contrast, the RTX 5080 is a Blackwell 2.0 flagship, featuring 10752 shading units and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The benchmark results indicate that this CPU-GPU combination is capable of delivering high frame rates, but the relationship between the processor's older architecture and the modern graphics card is critical to understanding where performance bottlenecks occur.

The measured FPS data reveals that this combo is not holding back the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the average frame rates are exceptionally high, reaching 413 FPS on Low settings and 357 FPS on Medium. These figures suggest that the Ryzen 5 4600G's single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 726, is sufficient to feed the RTX 5080 at these settings. However, the picture changes at higher resolutions and settings, where the workload shifts more onto the GPU. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13593 and its 3dmark_max_threads score of 4889 indicate a capable, but not elite, multi-threaded processor. In a sports game like Undisputed, the data suggests that the CPU's role is primarily to maintain a stable frame pacing, which it does effectively, but it is the GPU that dictates the highest fidelity experiences.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 4600G is a Zen 2 (Renoir) part with 6 cores and 12 threads. Its base and boost clocks of 3.70 GHz and 4.20 GHz, respectively, give it a moderate frequency ceiling that is typical of its generation. The processor's 8 MB of shared L3 cache is modest by modern standards, but the benchmark results show it is not a crippling limitation in Undisputed. The CPU's performance percentile of 71 versus all CPUs places it in the upper-mid range, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE and the Intel Core i3-14100T, with average benchmark scores within a 1% delta of each other. This indicates that the 4600G is competitive within its class, but it is not a top-tier performer.

In the context of Undisputed, the CPU's role appears to be one of a stable foundation rather than a performance differentiator. The data shows that at 1080p, the frame rates are extremely high, which strongly implies that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at this resolution. For instance, the average FPS at 1080p Low is 413, which is a massive number that only a very fast GPU could produce, suggesting the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output. However, the single-threaded nature of many game physics and AI calculations means that the 4600G's 3dmark_single_thread score of 726 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 805 are relevant. These scores are good, but they are not exceptional, and they could limit performance in scenarios with many on-screen characters or complex interactions.

The multi-threaded performance of the CPU is also a factor. With a Passmark multithread score of 15992 and a Geekbench multicore score of 6637, the 4600G provides a solid level of parallel processing capability. In a sports simulation, this can help with background tasks, game logic, and streaming. The data indicates that this combo does not suffer from severe CPU limitations at 1440p either. At 1440p High, the average FPS is 214, and at 1440p Ultra, it drops to 137. These numbers suggest that the CPU is still providing enough throughput to allow the RTX 5080 to work efficiently. The bottleneck analysis is best understood by looking at the scaling between resolutions. Going from 1080p High (296 FPS) to 1440p High (214 FPS) is a 28% drop, which is a typical GPU-bound scaling pattern. This implies that the CPU is not the limiting factor at these settings; rather, the GPU is being tasked more heavily.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data for this combo provides a clear picture of how different settings impact performance across resolutions. The most balanced experience appears to be at the Medium preset, which is the only setting row that includes min and max FPS values, indicating a more thorough data capture. At 3840x2160 Medium, the average FPS is 163, with a minimum of 139 and a maximum of 188. This shows a playable and consistent frame rate for 4K gaming, where dips below 139 FPS are unlikely. Moving up to High at 4K drops the average to 135 FPS, which is still smooth but offers less headroom. The Ultra preset at 4K produces an average of 87 FPS, which is a significant drop and may not be ideal for high-refresh-rate 4K displays.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset again stands out as a sweet spot. The average FPS is 258, with a minimum of 219 and a maximum of 297. This provides excellent fluidity for 1440p gaming, and the minimum FPS is high enough to ensure a smooth experience even in intense moments. The High preset at 1440p yields an average of 214 FPS, which is also very good, but the Medium preset offers a noticeable performance boost with a 20% increase in average FPS. For 1920x1080, the Medium preset gives an average of 357 FPS, with a minimum of 304 and a maximum of 411. This is an extraordinary level of performance that far exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors. The Low preset at 1080p pushes the average to 413 FPS, but the visual fidelity loss is likely not worth the extra frames given how high the Medium preset already is.

The data suggests that the Medium preset is the optimal choice for this CPU-GPU combo across all resolutions. It offers a substantial performance advantage over High and Ultra, while still providing a visually rich experience. For users with a 4K display, the Medium preset at 163 FPS average is the best way to utilize the RTX 5080's power without hitting the CPU or GPU limits that cause the Ultra preset to drop to 87 FPS. At 1440p and 1080p, the Medium preset provides frame rates that are so high that any higher preset would only serve to reduce performance without a meaningful visual improvement.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Undisputed smoothly?*

A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 163, with a minimum of 139 FPS. This indicates a very smooth 4K experience. Even on High settings, the average is 135 FPS, which is still excellent for 4K.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the main bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is not the bottleneck at 1080p, as the average FPS reaches 413 on Low settings. This high frame rate implies the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data, but it also means the CPU's single-thread performance, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 726, is the likely ceiling for extreme frame rates.

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for maximum performance?

A: According to the measured data, the highest average FPS is achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings, reaching 413 FPS. However, the Medium preset at 1080p, which averages 357 FPS, offers a much better balance of performance and visual quality.

Q: How does the RTX 5080's performance in this game compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. It is 2.2% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 4600G limit the RTX 5080 in any way?

A: The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 87, which is a significant reduction from the 163 FPS at Medium. This could be due to the CPU's multi-threaded performance limits, as its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 13593, which is not top-tier.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Ultra and Medium presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 137 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 258 FPS. This represents a 47% performance increase when dropping from Ultra to Medium, making Medium the better choice for high-refresh-rate gaming.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks at position 245 out of 3718 tested combos in Undisputed. This puts it in the top 6.6% of all configurations tested for this game, which is a strong showing. The rank is likely driven by the sheer power of the RTX 5080, which is in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU, while not a top performer, is still in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, which is above average. The data indicates that this combo is not held back by a weak link; rather, it is a pairing of a solid mid-range CPU with a high-end GPU.

The rank of 245 is impressive considering the CPU's age and market segment. The Ryzen 5 4600G was released in 2020 and is a 65 W part, while the RTX 5080 is a 360 W flagship that launched in 2025. The fact that this pairing achieves such a high rank suggests that Undisputed is not a heavily CPU-dependent game, or that the 4600G's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for the game's demands. The combo's performance is likely limited by the CPU in certain scenarios, but the overall ranking shows that it does not prevent the system from achieving high frame rates in most situations. Given that the combo is ranked 245th, it outperforms the vast majority of other tested systems, which indicates that the RTX 5080 is a dominant force in this title, and the CPU does not drag it down enough to hurt the overall ranking.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the primary driver of performance in this combo. It features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. This is a massive amount of memory and bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for Undisputed at any resolution. The GPU's base clock is 2295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2617 MHz, and it has a TDP of 360 W. The sheer compute power of this card, with 10752 shading units and an FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS, is what allows the system to reach the high frame rates seen in the data.

The GPU's role is clearly to handle the heavy lifting of rendering at higher resolutions and settings. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 87, which is a sharp drop from the 163 FPS at 4K Medium. This indicates that the GPU is being pushed to its limits at the highest settings, but it still produces playable frame rates. The RTX 5080's performance percentile of 87 versus all GPUs places it in the upper echelon, and its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, is only 2.2% faster on average. This shows that the 5080 is a top-tier GPU, but not the absolute fastest. The 16 GB of VRAM is a significant asset, as it ensures that the game will not run into memory limitations at 4K, even with high-resolution textures. The GPU's memory clock of 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective) and its 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure that data can be fed to the processor cores quickly, which is essential for maintaining high frame rates in a fast-paced sports game.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data for this combo provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is achieved on Low settings at 227 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 163 FPS, with a minimum of 139 and a maximum of 188. The High preset averages 135 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 87 FPS. This shows a clear scaling pattern where each step up in settings costs a significant number of frames, with the jump from Medium to Ultra being a 47% reduction in average FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance increases substantially. The Low preset averages 359 FPS, which is a 58% increase over the 4K Low result. The Medium preset averages 258 FPS, with a minimum of 219 and a maximum of 297. The High preset averages 214 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 137 FPS. The scaling between settings is similar to 4K, but the absolute numbers are much higher, making 1440p a very comfortable resolution for this combo.

At 1920x1080, the results are extraordinary. The Low preset averages 413 FPS, which is the highest number in the entire dataset. The Medium preset averages 357 FPS, with a minimum of 304 and a maximum of 411. The High preset averages 296 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 190 FPS. The data shows that at 1080p, the combo is almost certainly CPU-bound at the lower settings, as the frame rates are so high that the GPU is not the limiting factor. The Ultra preset at 1080p, with an average of 190 FPS, still provides a very high level of performance, but it is a far cry from the 413 FPS at Low, indicating that the visual fidelity settings have a massive impact on the GPU load.