Undisputed

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, built on a 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. This is a Renoir-series desktop chip for the AM4 socket, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. Its integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are present, though irrelevant here given the discrete GPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU scores 1,919 points in Cinebench R23 single-core and 13,593 points in multi-core. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 17,507, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals in aggregate performance are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (avg score 17,482, +0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (17,614, -0.6%), the Intel Core 7 150U (17,395, +0.6%), and the Intel Core i3-14100T (17,648, -0.8%). This indicates the 4600G sits in a competitive mid-range band, neither dominating nor being dominated by its immediate peers.

For Undisputed, a sports title, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with game logic, physics, and AI computations. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for modern sports sims, but the single-thread score of 1,919 in Cinebench R23 suggests that heavily threaded physics or AI could become a bottleneck at very high frame rates. Notably, the measured FPS at 1080p Low reaches 413 avg, which is extraordinarily high. At such frame rates, the CPU's per-core performance becomes critical. The 3DMark single-thread score of 726 and 2-thread score of 1,430 are modest, implying that at extreme frame rates (above 400 FPS), the 4600G is likely limiting the absolute ceiling, even if the average user won't notice.

The 3DMark 16-thread score of 4,863 and max-thread score of 4,889 are nearly identical, indicating the CPU leverages all 12 threads efficiently. However, the 8-thread score of 4,138 is notably lower, suggesting that scaling beyond 8 threads yields diminishing returns in this synthetic workload. For Undisputed, which is unlikely to use all 12 threads heavily, the 4600G's 6 physical cores provide a solid baseline, but the lack of a high boost clock (4.20 GHz max) means it won't be a champion at pushing frame rates above what the GPU can handle.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a massive GPU from the Ada Lovelace generation, fabricated on a 5 nm process. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 10,240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, with 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. Its base clock is 2,295 MHz, boosting to 2,550 MHz, and memory runs at 1,438 MHz (23 Gbps effective). This is a triple-slot card with a 320 W TDP, requiring a 700 W PSU and a single 16-pin connector.

The GPU's synthetic benchmarks are stellar: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 260,075, and a Passmark G3D score of 34,245. It also scores 219,065 in Geekbench OpenCL and 19,822 in Passmark GPU Compute. With an average benchmark score of 54,209, it sits in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (avg 54,247, -0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828, -1.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, -2.7%), and the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757, -2.8%). This places the 4080 SUPER essentially at parity with its direct predecessor, the RTX 4080, with negligible differences in aggregate scores.

For Undisputed, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is more than ample for any resolution, including 4K Ultra settings. The massive FP32 throughput of 52.22 TFLOPS and texture rate of 816.0 GTexel/s ensure that the GPU can render complex scenes with ease. At 4K Ultra, the combo still manages 83 avg FPS, which reflects the GPU's raw power. The 4080 SUPER's role is clearly the dominant component in this pairing: at 1080p Low, the FPS skyrockets to 413, but the GPU's compute capacity is so high that the CPU becomes the bottleneck at these extreme frame rates. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth mean texture loading and high-resolution rendering are never constrained, as evidenced by the relatively small FPS drop from Medium to High at 1440p (248 to 205 avg).

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data provides four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) across three resolutions. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 413 (Low) down to 183 (Ultra). Medium yields 343 avg, while High gives 284 avg. The jump from Medium to High costs 59 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs another 101 FPS. For a sports game where high refresh rates matter, Medium at 1080p (343 avg) is the sweet spot: it delivers over 300 FPS with a minimum observed of 291 FPS (from the Medium preset's minFps field), ensuring smooth gameplay on any 144Hz or 240Hz monitor. Ultra at 1080p (183 avg) is still playable but sacrifices significant smoothness for marginal visual gains.

At 1440p, the pattern shifts. Low produces 344 avg, Medium 248 avg, High 205 avg, and Ultra 132 avg. The Medium preset at 1440p (248 avg) is exceptional, providing high frame rates with better visual fidelity than Low. The High preset (205 avg) is also excellent, offering a more immersive experience at a frame rate that exceeds most 144Hz monitors. Ultra at 1440p (132 avg) dips below 144 FPS, so for competitive play, Medium or High is preferable. The data shows that Medium at 1440p provides a 21% reduction in FPS compared to Low (248 vs 344), which is a reasonable trade-off for the visual upgrade.

At 4K, the options narrow. High yields 130 avg, Medium 157 avg, and Ultra 83 avg. Low at 4K produces 218 avg, which is surprisingly high, indicating the game scales well with lower settings. For 4K, Medium (157 avg) is the recommended preset, as it balances visual quality with a frame rate that remains above 130 FPS. High (130 avg) is still playable on high-refresh 4K displays, but Ultra (83 avg) is only suitable for cinematic 60Hz play. The Medium preset at 4K has a minFps of 133 and maxFps of 180, showing consistent performance. For the best experience across all resolutions, Medium settings offer the most balanced trade-off between frame rate and visual fidelity, with 343 (1080p), 248 (1440p), and 157 (4K) avg FPS.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 363rd out of 3,718 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the top 9.8% of all tested configurations, which is a strong result given the CPU's mid-range positioning. The rank of 363 indicates that while the GPU is a top-tier component (86th percentile), the CPU's 71st percentile performance holds the combo back from cracking the top 100.

The 3,718 total combos span a wide range of hardware, and the 4600G's relatively modest single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1,919) likely prevents the combo from achieving a higher rank. In a game like Undisputed, where frame rates can exceed 400 FPS at low settings, the CPU's ability to process game logic at those speeds becomes the limiting factor. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo hits 413 avg FPS, but this is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU is capable of far more.

Compared to other combos in the database, this pairing's rank of 363 suggests it outperforms the vast majority but is outclassed by those using higher-end CPUs like the Ryzen 7 or Core i7 series paired with the same GPU. The delta between the 4600G and its nearest CPU rivals is small (within ±0.8%), so swapping to a slightly better CPU would not dramatically change the rank. However, pairing this GPU with a top-tier CPU could push the combo into the top 50, indicating that the CPU is the bottleneck in this configuration.

The 4K Ultra result of 83 avg FPS is respectable, but at 4K, the GPU is more heavily utilized, and the CPU bottleneck is less pronounced. This is evident in the fact that the rank improves relative to lower resolutions, where the CPU's limitations are more exposed. Overall, the combo rank of 363 out of 3,718 is a solid mid-to-high-tier result, but it underscores that the 4600G is not the ideal partner for the RTX 4080 SUPER in a frame-rate-sensitive title.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

Examining the FPS progression across resolutions at each setting reveals the balance between CPU and GPU load. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 413 (1080p) to 344 (1440p) to 218 (4K). This represents a 16.7% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 36.6% drop from 1440p to 4K. The relatively small drop from 1080p to 1440p suggests that at Low settings, the CPU is still the primary limiter at 1080p, and the GPU has headroom. At 4K Low, the GPU becomes more stressed, but 218 FPS is still extremely high.

At Medium settings, the FPS goes from 343 (1080p) to 248 (1440p) to 157 (4K), with drops of 27.7% and 36.7%, respectively. The larger drop from 1080p to 1440p (compared to Low settings) indicates that the GPU is starting to become more involved. At High settings, the drop is from 284 (1080p) to 205 (1440p) to 130 (4K), representing 27.8% and 36.6% drops. At Ultra settings, the FPS drops from 183 (1080p) to 132 (1440p) to 83 (4K), with drops of 27.9% and 37.1%.

The consistency of the percentage drops across Medium, High, and Ultra (all around 27-28% from 1080p to 1440p, and 36-37% from 1440p to 4K) is telling. This pattern indicates that at these settings, the GPU is the dominant scaling factor, as the frame rate scales predictably with pixel count. The fact that Low settings show a smaller drop from 1080p to 1440p (16.7%) suggests that at Low, the CPU is still limiting performance at 1080p, and the GPU has spare capacity until 4K.

The 4K Ultra result of 83 avg FPS is particularly informative. The drop from 1080p Ultra (183) to 4K Ultra (83) is a 54.6% reduction, which is more than the 36-37% seen at other settings. This indicates that at 4K Ultra, the GPU is fully saturated, and the CPU has less influence on the result. Conversely, the 1080p Low result of 413 FPS is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU could theoretically push higher if the CPU could keep up. The data clearly shows that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the limiting component at 4K and high settings, while the Ryzen 5 4600G becomes the bottleneck at 1080p with lower settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table summarizes the average FPS for each resolution and settings preset:

1920x1080:

• Low: 413 avg FPS
• Medium: 343 avg FPS (min 291, max 394)
• High: 284 avg FPS
• Ultra: 183 avg FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 344 avg FPS
• Medium: 248 avg FPS (min 211, max 285)
• High: 205 avg FPS
• Ultra: 132 avg FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 218 avg FPS
• Medium: 157 avg FPS (min 133, max 180)
• High: 130 avg FPS
• Ultra: 83 avg FPS

At 1080p, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all settings. Even Ultra settings produce 183 avg FPS, which is above the refresh rate of most gaming monitors. The Medium preset's min of 291 FPS ensures no drops below 240Hz, making it ideal for competitive play. The spread from Low to Ultra (413 to 183) is a 55.7% reduction, showing the impact of graphical fidelity on frame rate.

At 1440p, the performance remains strong. The Low preset (344 avg) is overkill for most 144Hz displays, and Medium (248 avg) provides a great balance. The High preset (205 avg) still exceeds 144Hz, while Ultra (132 avg) dips below, making it less suitable for high-refresh gaming. The Medium preset's min of 211 FPS ensures smooth gameplay on 144Hz monitors without any drops.

At 4K, the performance is more variable. Low (218 avg) is excellent, Medium (157 avg) is very good, and High (130 avg) is acceptable for 144Hz displays. Ultra (83 avg) is the only preset that drops below 100 FPS, making it suitable only for 60Hz displays or those with VRR. The Medium preset at 4K has a min of 133 FPS, which means it can dip below 144Hz but remains above 120Hz, providing a good experience on 120Hz+ displays.

The minFps data is only available for Medium settings at each resolution: 291 (1080p), 211 (1440p), and 133 (4K). These minimums indicate that the Medium preset provides consistent frame pacing, with the 4K minimum (133) being 15% below the average (157), showing some variance but no severe stuttering.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with Ultra settings?

A: The average FPS at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings is 132. This is lower than the Medium preset's 248 avg FPS, making Ultra less ideal for high-refresh displays.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 4600G compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G has an average benchmark score of 17,507, while the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE scores 17,482. This represents a delta of +0.1%, meaning the 4600G is essentially identical in aggregate performance, with a negligible 25-point advantage.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 SUPER or the Ryzen 5 4600G the bottleneck at 1080p Low settings?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 413 avg FPS. Given that the GPU is in the 86th percentile and the CPU in the 71st, the CPU is likely the limiting factor at this resolution and settings, as the GPU has more headroom than the CPU can feed.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 4K Medium settings?

A: The minimum FPS at 3840x2160 with Medium settings is 133, with a maximum of 180 and an average of 157. This shows that the frame rate can vary by up to 15% from the average.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations in Undisputed?

A: This combo ranks 363rd out of 3,718 tested combos, placing it in the top 9.8% of all configurations. This is a strong result, but the CPU's mid-range performance prevents a higher ranking.

Q: What is the average FPS difference between 1080p High and 4K High settings?

A: At 1080p High, the average FPS is 284, while at 4K High, it is 130. This represents a 54.2% reduction in frame rate when scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings, indicating the GPU is heavily loaded at 4K.