Undisputed
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 176 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 63 | 98 | 118 | 164 |
| 1440p QHD | 99 | 154 | 187 | 259 |
| 1080p Full HD | 137 | 214 | 258 | 359 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, In-Depth Analysis
# Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
This combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers strong performance in Undisputed, with measured frame rates staying well above playable thresholds across most resolution and settings configurations. The data places this pairing at rank 1058 out of 3718 tested combos, putting it in the upper third of all system configurations tested for this boxing title.
Resolution Scaling
The performance trajectory from 1080p to 4K reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution, with the GPU becoming progressively more dominant as pixel count rises. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 359 FPS at 1920x1080 to 259 FPS at 2560x1440 — a 27.9% reduction — and then falls to 164 FPS at 3840x2160, representing another 36.7% decline from the 1440p figure. This steep scaling curve at Low settings indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enormous frame throughput at lower resolutions, but the rendering load quickly shifts to the graphics card as resolution increases.
Moving to Medium settings, the pattern holds but with slightly compressed absolute numbers. The 1080p average of 258 FPS drops to 187 FPS at 1440p (a 27.5% decrease), then to 118 FPS at 4K (a 36.9% drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage declines across Low and Medium suggests the system is well-balanced at these settings, with no single component creating a bottleneck that would flatten the scaling curve.
High settings show a similar relative pattern: 214 FPS at 1080p, 154 FPS at 1440p (down 28.0%), and 98 FPS at 4K (down 36.4% from 1440p). At Ultra settings, the absolute numbers compress further — 137 FPS at 1080p, 99 FPS at 1440p (down 27.7%), and 63 FPS at 4K (down 36.4%). The near-identical percentage drops across all four quality presets point to a system where resolution scaling is consistent and predictable, regardless of the graphics workload.
The 4K-to-1080p ratio at each setting tells the same story: at Low, the 4K average is 45.7% of the 1080p figure; at Medium, it is 45.7%; at High, 45.8%; and at Ultra, 46.0%. This tight clustering indicates that the RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 320-bit bus are not running into capacity or bandwidth walls even at 4K Ultra, where the average still reaches 63 FPS. The limiting factor at 4K is clearly raw GPU compute throughput rather than memory constraints, as the scaling remains proportional across settings.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, based on the GA102 chip with Ampere architecture, provides the rendering muscle for this combination. Its 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output processors deliver a pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s. The card operates with a base clock of 1440 MHz and a boost clock of 1710 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) across a 320-bit bus, yielding 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth.
The GPU's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory appears sufficient for Undisputed at all tested settings. At 4K Ultra, the average of 63 FPS — while the lowest figure in the dataset — does not suggest any memory-related stuttering or capacity-related frame drops, as the minimum FPS values recorded for Medium settings at 4K (100 FPS minimum) and 1440p (159 FPS minimum) show reasonable frame pacing. The absence of minimum FPS data for High, Low, and Ultra settings leaves some gaps, but the Medium preset data indicates the memory subsystem handles the game's demands without severe dips.
The RTX 3080's FP32 throughput of 29.77 TFLOPS and its 68 ray tracing cores are not heavily exercised in a sports title like Undisputed, which relies more on traditional rasterization. The PassMark G3D score of 25086 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 place this GPU at the 68th percentile of all GPUs, putting it ahead of a majority of graphics cards while trailing top-end parts. The nearest rivals in the benchmark database — the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, AMD Radeon RX 6600M, and AMD Radeon R9 M290X — all sit within 0.4% of the RTX 3080's average benchmark score of 23172, though these comparisons reflect synthetic workloads rather than Undisputed-specific performance.
At 1080p Low, the 359 FPS average shows the GPU is not the limiting factor; the CPU and memory subsystem are feeding frames as fast as the engine can produce them. The scaling to 4K Low at 164 FPS demonstrates the GPU's ability to handle a 4x increase in pixel count while still delivering high refresh rates. The card's 320 W TDP and 700 W suggested PSU requirement indicate substantial power draw, but the benchmark data shows this power translates directly into frame throughput across all resolution and settings combinations.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 1058 out of 3718 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the 71.5th percentile of all system configurations tested for this game. This rank reflects the pairing's ability to deliver high frame rates across the board, but also shows there is substantial headroom above this configuration in the tested pool.
The CPU component of this pairing sits at the 71st percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17507. Its nearest rivals in the CPU rankings — the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (0.1% faster), Intel Core 7 150U (0.6% slower), AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (0.6% slower), and Intel Core i3-14100T (0.8% slower) — all cluster within a single percentage point, indicating the 4600G's synthetic performance is broadly representative of mid-range processors. The GPU ranks at the 68th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 23172, and its nearest rivals all sit within 0.4% of its score.
The gap between the combo's in-game rank (71.5th percentile) and the GPU's synthetic percentile (68th) suggests that Undisputed is somewhat more favorable to this pairing than pure GPU benchmarks would indicate. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking helps explain this: the 4600G's six cores and twelve threads are sufficient to keep the RTX 3080 fed at lower resolutions, where the game becomes less GPU-bound. The combo rank of 1058 out of 3718 means roughly 2660 other tested configurations outperform this pairing in Undisputed, but the measured frame rates show the difference is unlikely to matter at standard refresh rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 3080 delivers exceptional performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 359 FPS, which is the highest figure in the entire dataset. Medium settings drop to 258 FPS, with a minimum of 219 FPS and maximum of 297 FPS, showing consistent frame delivery. High settings average 214 FPS, while Ultra settings yield 137 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p — a 222 FPS difference — demonstrates the significant impact of quality presets on this GPU at lower resolutions.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the averages remain high. Low settings hit 259 FPS, Medium averages 187 FPS with a 159 FPS minimum and 215 FPS maximum, High delivers 154 FPS, and Ultra produces 99 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings, with the percentage reduction ranging from 27.5% at Medium to 28.0% at High. This uniformity indicates the GPU is the primary scaling factor, with the CPU maintaining its ability to feed frames at 1440p.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 3080 shows its limits but still delivers playable results. Low settings average 164 FPS, Medium averages 118 FPS with a 100 FPS minimum and 136 FPS maximum, High produces 98 FPS, and Ultra drops to 63 FPS. The 4K Ultra figure of 63 FPS is the only average in the dataset below 90 FPS, but it remains comfortably above 60 FPS for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 4K, with its 100 FPS minimum, shows that even at maximum resolution, frame pacing holds up without severe dips.
The Medium preset is the only setting level with complete minimum and maximum FPS data across all three resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the minimum of 219 FPS and maximum of 297 FPS create a 78 FPS range, indicating minor variance. At 1440p Medium, the range narrows to 56 FPS (159 to 215), and at 4K Medium, it shrinks further to 36 FPS (100 to 136). This tightening range at higher resolutions suggests the GPU's workload becomes more consistent as pixel count increases, reducing the frame time spikes that can occur at lower resolutions where the CPU is pushing frames faster.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data offers clear guidance for players prioritizing frame rate versus visual fidelity. At 1080p, every preset delivers at least 137 FPS on average, meaning even Ultra settings provide a high-refresh experience. The 214 FPS average at High settings represents a sweet spot for competitive play, offering a 56.2% improvement over Ultra while still maintaining substantial visual quality over Medium's 258 FPS.
At 1440p, High settings at 154 FPS average provide the best balance for high-refresh monitors, as the 99 FPS Ultra figure drops below the 100 FPS threshold that many 144Hz displays can take full advantage of. The Medium preset at 187 FPS offers additional headroom, though the visual quality reduction may not be justified for most players. The 4K resolution tells a different story: Ultra at 63 FPS is playable but leaves little margin for demanding scenes, while High at 98 FPS offers near-100 FPS performance with better visual fidelity than Medium's 118 FPS.
For players with 144Hz displays at 1080p or 1440p, High settings are the recommended starting point — they clear the 144 FPS threshold at both resolutions (214 FPS and 154 FPS respectively) while keeping visual quality high. At 4K, High settings at 98 FPS provide the best combination of smoothness and fidelity, as the 63 FPS Ultra figure may feel less responsive on high-refresh displays. The Low preset, while delivering 359 FPS at 1080p and 164 FPS at 4K, sacrifices too much visual quality for the marginal frame rate gains beyond what High settings already provide.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G, a 7 nm Zen 2 part from the Renoir family, brings six cores and twelve threads to this pairing. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz, combined with 8 MB of shared L3 cache, provide the processing throughput needed to keep the RTX 3080 fed. The CPU's 3DMark scores show a scaling pattern from 1430 at 2 threads to 4863 at 16 threads and 4889 at max threads, indicating adequate multi-threaded scaling for a six-core part.
Synthetic benchmarks place the 4600G's multi-threaded performance at 13593 in Cinebench R23, with a single-core score of 1919. The Geekbench results show 6637 multi-core and 1460 single-core, while PassMark multithread score reaches 15992. These figures put the CPU at the 71st percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 17507. The nearest rivals in the database — all within 0.8% of the 4600G's score — confirm it sits in a crowded mid-range performance band.
In Undisputed, the CPU's role becomes most apparent at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 359 FPS average suggests the CPU is capable of driving the engine to its frame rate limits, as the RTX 3080 would be expected to deliver higher numbers in a purely GPU-bound scenario at these modest settings. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Low (359 to 259 FPS) and Medium (258 to 187 FPS) shows the CPU's influence diminishes as resolution increases, with the GPU taking over as the primary performance driver.
The 4600G's 12 threads provide sufficient parallelism for a sports title like Undisputed, which typically uses fewer threads than strategy or simulation games. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 4863, nearly identical to its max-thread score of 4889, indicates the processor extracts most of its performance from its twelve threads without significant scaling drop-off. The 65 W TDP and AMD Socket AM4 compatibility make this a modest power draw component, but the benchmark data shows it does not bottleneck the RTX 3080 at any tested resolution or settings combination — the frame rates scale consistently with GPU workload, suggesting balanced system behavior throughout.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in Undisputed
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 164.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 118.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 98.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 63.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 259.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 187.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 154.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 99.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 359.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 258.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 214.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 137.0 |
Undisputed with Ryzen 5 4600G + Other GPUs
See how Undisputed performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Undisputed with RTX 3080 + Other CPUs
See how Undisputed performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 4600G + RTX 3080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.