Undisputed

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured frame rates for this AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination reveal a clear pattern: the RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary performance driver at 1080p, but the balance shifts decisively toward the GPU as resolution climbs. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 252 FPS average — an extremely high ceiling that indicates the CPU can feed the GPU well beyond typical display refresh rates. However, this number collapses as settings and resolution increase, which is the expected signature of a GPU-bound configuration.

Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS drops from 150 to 109 — a 27% reduction. The same step at Low settings shows a steeper fall from 252 to 182 FPS, a 28% decline. This consistency suggests the scaling is resolution-driven rather than settings-driven, which points to the GPU's fill-rate and memory bandwidth becoming the limiting factor. The RTX 2070 SUPER’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 113.3 GPixel/s pixel rate are being exercised progressively harder as pixel count grows.

At 4K (3840x2160), the picture becomes more extreme. High settings yield 69 FPS average, which is 54% lower than the 1440p High result. Low settings produce 115 FPS at 4K versus 182 at 1440p — a 37% drop. Medium settings at 4K show 83 FPS average with a minimum of 71 and maximum of 95, indicating some frame-time variance but still a playable experience. The Ultra preset at 4K falls to 44 FPS average, which is the lowest measured result across the entire test matrix.

The scaling data shows that from 1080p Ultra (97 FPS) to 4K Ultra (44 FPS), the average frame rate drops by 55%. This halving of performance across a 4x pixel-count increase is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario — the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 9.062 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is being saturated. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads at 3.70 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost, is not the bottleneck at higher resolutions; the evidence lies in the fact that the 1080p Low result of 252 FPS is nearly 2.7x higher than the 4K Low result of 115 FPS, despite the identical settings load on the CPU.

The frame rate deltas between settings at a fixed resolution further confirm GPU dominance. At 1440p, Low produces 182 FPS, Medium 131, High 109, and Ultra 70 — a monotonic decline that tracks exactly with the increasing GPU workload. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see the FPS gap between Low and Ultra narrow at higher resolutions as the GPU becomes the constraint. Instead, the gaps widen: at 1080p, the Low-to-Ultra spread is 155 FPS (252 vs 97); at 1440p, it is 112 FPS (182 vs 70); at 4K, it is 71 FPS (115 vs 44). This pattern indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER is scaling predictably with pixel count, and the Ryzen 5 4600G is comfortably keeping pace even at the lowest resolution settings.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination ranks 2163 out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed. This places the combo in the 42nd percentile of all tested configurations — meaning roughly 58% of tested combos deliver higher average frame rates in this title. The rank is based on measured data across the resolution and settings matrix, and it reflects the RTX 2070 SUPER’s position as a mid-tier GPU from the GeForce 20-series.

The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 65, which is notably higher than the combo’s overall rank. This discrepancy suggests that the CPU is pulling the combo down relative to what the GPU alone could achieve. The Ryzen 5 4600G has a percentileVsAllCpus of 71, but its average benchmark score of 17507 is lower than several close rivals. The nearest CPU rivals include the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE with an average score of 17482 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE at 17614 (-0.6% delta, meaning the 4600G scores 0.6% lower), the Intel Core 7 150U at 17395 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i3-14100T at 17648 (-0.8% delta). These tight margins — all within 1% of each other — indicate that the 4600G is squarely in a competitive cluster of mid-range processors.

On the GPU side, the RTX 2070 SUPER’s nearest rivals are all within 1.5% of its average benchmark score of 20282. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480 (-1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (-1.2%), the Intel Arc B570 scores 20556 (-1.3%), and the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (-1.5%). The RTX 2070 SUPER is the weakest of this group in raw benchmark terms, but the deltas are small enough that in-game performance differences are likely to be marginal.

The combo rank of 2163 out of 3718 is a middle-of-the-pack result. It is not a top-tier configuration by any means, but it is also far from the bottom. The measured data shows that the combo can achieve 97 FPS at 1080p Ultra and 69 FPS at 4K High, which are respectable numbers for a sports title. The rank is heavily influenced by the Ultra preset at 4K, where the 44 FPS average drags down the overall standing. In a game like Undisputed, which is a boxing sports title not known for extreme graphical demands, this combo sits comfortably in the upper-middle range of tested systems.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based strictly on the measured FPS data, the Medium preset at 1440p offers the best balance for this combo. At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 131, with a minimum of 112 and a maximum of 151. The minimum of 112 FPS is above the 60 FPS threshold that most users consider playable, and the 131 average provides headroom for frame-time spikes. The 1440p Medium result also shows a narrower min-max spread (112 to 151, a range of 39 FPS) compared to the 1080p Medium result (154 to 209, a range of 55 FPS), suggesting more consistent frame pacing at the higher resolution.

For users prioritizing maximum visual quality, the High preset at 1440p is the best option. It delivers 109 FPS average, which is still well above 60 FPS, and the visual uplift from Medium to High is typically noticeable in sports titles. The 4K High preset at 69 FPS average is also viable for users with 4K displays who can tolerate slightly lower frame rates, as it stays above 60 FPS. However, the 4K Ultra preset at 44 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS mark and is not recommended for competitive or smooth gameplay.

At 1080p, the Ultra preset produces 97 FPS average, which is perfectly playable and offers the highest fidelity. The 1080p High preset at 150 FPS is excellent for high-refresh-rate displays, and the 1080p Low preset at 252 FPS is overkill for virtually any display but demonstrates the CPU’s capability. The 1080p Medium preset at 182 FPS with a minimum of 154 FPS is also a strong choice for esports-style play.

The data suggests avoiding the Ultra preset at 4K entirely — the 44 FPS average is the only measured result below 60 FPS, and the lack of min/max data for this row indicates it may be unstable. The 4K Low preset at 115 FPS is a curious outlier: it performs better than 4K Medium (83 FPS) and 4K High (69 FPS), which is expected, but the jump from Low to Medium costs 32 FPS (a 28% reduction) while the jump from Medium to High costs only 14 FPS (a 17% reduction). This non-linear scaling suggests that Medium settings at 4K hit a sweet spot for the GTX 2070 SUPER’s memory subsystem.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The full measured FPS matrix for this combo covers three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 252, with no min or max values recorded. The Medium preset averages 182 FPS with a minimum of 154 and maximum of 209. The High preset averages 150 FPS with no min/max data. The Ultra preset at 1080p averages 97 FPS with no min/max data. The progression from Low to Medium represents a 28% drop, from Medium to High an 18% drop, and from High to Ultra a 35% drop.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 182 FPS with no min/max data. The Medium preset averages 131 FPS with a minimum of 112 and maximum of 151. The High preset averages 109 FPS with no min/max data. The Ultra preset averages 70 FPS with no min/max data. The Low-to-Medium drop is 28%, Medium-to-High is 17%, and High-to-Ultra is 36%. Notably, the 1440p Low result (182 FPS) is identical to the 1080p Medium result (182 FPS), which highlights the GPU’s ability to compensate for the resolution increase with a settings reduction.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 115 FPS with no min/max data. The Medium preset averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 71 and maximum of 95. The High preset averages 69 FPS with no min/max data. The Ultra preset averages 44 FPS with no min/max data. The Low-to-Medium drop is 28%, Medium-to-High is 17%, and High-to-Ultra is 36% — the exact same percentage drops as at 1440p. This consistency across resolutions is remarkable and indicates that the GPU’s performance scaling is perfectly linear with respect to settings, regardless of resolution.

The only rows with min/max data are the Medium presets at all three resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the range is 154 to 209 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 112 to 151 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 71 to 95 FPS. The absolute spread narrows as resolution increases (55 FPS at 1080p, 39 FPS at 1440p, 24 FPS at 4K), but the relative spread as a percentage of the average also shrinks (30% at 1080p, 30% at 1440p, 29% at 4K). This suggests that frame-time consistency is stable across resolutions for this combo.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?

A: Based on the measured data, 1440p Medium offers the best balance with 131 FPS average and a minimum of 112 FPS. The 1440p High preset at 109 FPS is also excellent. At 1080p, all presets exceed 97 FPS, making it safe for high-refresh displays. At 4K, only the Low preset (115 FPS) and Medium preset (83 FPS) stay above 60 FPS.

Q: Can this combo run Undisputed at 4K?

A: Yes, but with limitations. The 4K High preset averages 69 FPS, which is above 60 FPS. The 4K Medium preset averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 71 FPS. The 4K Ultra preset averages only 44 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and not recommended. The 4K Low preset achieves 115 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G has an average benchmark score of 17507, placing it at the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, scores 17482 (0.1% higher). The Intel Core 7 150U scores 17395 (0.6% higher), while the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 17614 (0.6% lower) and the Intel Core i3-14100T scores 17648 (0.8% lower). All rivals are within 1% of the 4600G.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest competitors?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 20282 and sits at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, scores 20480 (1% higher). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (1.2% higher), the Intel Arc B570 scores 20556 (1.3% higher), and the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (1.5% higher). The RTX 2070 SUPER is the lowest-scoring of this group.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this combo?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 252 FPS, showing the CPU can feed the GPU well. The FPS drops are consistent with GPU-bound scaling: from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, FPS drops from 252 to 115 (54% reduction), which tracks with pixel-count increases. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for this title.

Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking among tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 2163 out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed. This places it in the 42nd percentile of all tested configurations. The GPU’s percentile rank of 65 is higher than the combo’s overall rank, suggesting the CPU slightly limits the combo’s standing. The CPU’s percentile rank of 71 is also higher than the combo’s rank.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G brings 6 cores and 12 threads to this combo, running at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. This is a Zen 2 architecture part built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU features 8 MB of shared L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 64 KB of L1 per core. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

In the context of Undisputed, these specifications are more than adequate. The measured data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo hits 252 FPS average — a result that would be impossible if the CPU were significantly limiting frame generation. The 3.70 GHz base clock is modest by modern standards, but the 4.20 GHz boost clock provides the single-thread headroom that sports titles typically require. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1919 and multi-core score of 13593 indicate a balanced processor that can handle both the game logic and background tasks.

The CPU’s benchmark scores paint a picture of a solid mid-range performer. The 3DMark results show scaling from 726 in single-thread to 4889 in max-threads, which is a 6.7x improvement — reasonable for a 6-core/12-thread part. The Geekbench single-core score of 1460 and multi-core score of 6637 are competitive with the CPU’s nearest rivals, all of which score within 1% on the average benchmark. The PassMark multi-thread score of 15992 and single-thread score of 2653 further confirm its position.

The CPU’s role in this combo becomes clearer when examining the measured FPS data. At 1080p, the difference between Low (252 FPS) and Ultra (97 FPS) is 155 FPS, which is a GPU-driven reduction. The CPU does not show any signs of being a bottleneck at 1080p Low, as the 252 FPS average is well above what most displays can show. At higher resolutions, the CPU’s workload remains constant while the GPU’s increases, yet the FPS drops are proportional to the GPU load — confirming the CPU is not the limiting factor.

One notable aspect is the CPU’s integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics, which allows for system flexibility but is irrelevant to this discrete GPU configuration. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 3 interface with 20 lanes provides sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 2070 SUPER, which uses PCIe 3.0 x16. The 4.20 GHz boost clock is the key specification for this game, as Undisputed is a sports title that typically relies on a few heavily-threaded tasks rather than extreme multi-core scaling. The 12 threads ensure that background processes don’t interfere with the main game thread, and the 8 MB of shared L3 cache is adequate for the game’s working set.

The CPU’s launch MSRP was $154, and it remains in active production. Its 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the majority of processors in the database, which is a strong result for a 2020 release. The 7 nm process node and 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die indicate a modern, efficient design that balances power consumption with performance. For Undisputed specifically, the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 4863 and max-thread score of 4889 suggest that the processor is not leaving performance on the table — the gap between 16-thread and max-thread is minimal, indicating the 6-core/12-thread configuration is fully utilized without thermal or power throttling.