Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a balanced 1080p and 1440p experience in Undisputed, with the data showing that the combo ranks 2256th out of 2813 tested combinations in this specific title, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the field despite the GPU’s strong synthetic showing.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this combo?*

A: Based on the measured FPS data, 1920x1080 offers the highest frame rates across all settings, with averages ranging from 75 FPS at Ultra to 195 FPS at Low. The 2560x1440 results are also playable, with averages between 54 FPS at Ultra and 141 FPS at Low, while 3840x2160 drops to 34 FPS at Ultra and 53 FPS at High, making 1080p the safest choice for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the CPU perform in synthetic benchmarks relative to its peers?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G has an average benchmark score of 17507, which places it in the 71st percentile of all tested CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE with an average score of 17482 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core 7 150U at 17395 (0.6% slower), the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE at 17614 (0.6% faster), and the Intel Core i3-14100T at 17648 (0.8% faster).

Q: Is the Intel Arc B570 a good match for this game’s graphics demands?

A: The GPU’s synthetic benchmark results indicate it is a mid-range performer, with an average score of 20556 and a 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534 (0.1% slower), and the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (0.1% faster), confirming the B570 sits in a competitive performance band.

Q: What settings preset provides the most balanced experience at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers an average of 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth play, while High averages 84 FPS and Ultra drops to 54 FPS, so Medium offers the best combination of visual quality and frame rate stability.

Q: Does the CPU’s integrated graphics affect performance when paired with a discrete GPU?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G includes Radeon Vega 7 integrated graphics, but in this configuration with the Intel Arc B570 as the primary GPU, the discrete card handles all rendering tasks. The CPU’s benchmarks, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13593 and single-core score of 1919, reflect its processing capability which supports the GPU without bottlenecking in this title.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and is it sufficient for high resolutions?

A: The Intel Arc B570 comes with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. At 3840x2160, the data shows playable averages at Low (89 FPS) and Medium (64 FPS), indicating the VRAM capacity is adequate for this game even at 4K, though Ultra settings at that resolution drop to 34 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B570 achieves a rank of 2256 out of 2813 tested combinations in Undisputed. This places the pairing in the 80th percentile of tested systems, meaning roughly 20% of configurations perform worse, but a significant majority outperform it. The rank reflects the combined capabilities of both components as measured in this specific game, not their standalone synthetic scores.

The CPU’s percentile ranking of 71 among all CPUs suggests it is a solid mid-tier processor, but the combo rank is lower than that individual percentile would imply. This gap indicates that the GPU is the more limiting factor in this pairing for Undisputed, or that the game’s engine does not scale perfectly with the CPU’s strengths. The GPU’s percentile of 65 among all GPUs aligns more closely with the combo’s overall standing, reinforcing that graphics performance drives the final experience in this title.

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the performance deltas are minimal. The Ryzen 5 4600G scores 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, 0.6% higher than the Intel Core 7 150U, but 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and 0.8% lower than the Intel Core i3-14100T. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning the choice among these CPUs would not significantly alter Undisputed frame rates when paired with the same GPU.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B570 scores 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, 0.4% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, but 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750 and 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon R9 M390X. The close margins among these GPUs suggest that the B570 is competitive with last-generation mid-range mobile and desktop parts, but none of these rivals would dramatically change the combo’s rank in Undisputed.

The measured FPS data confirms that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where even the Ultra preset maintains an average of 75 FPS. At 1440p, the system remains viable for most presets, but 4K Ultra is not a realistic target with an average of 34 FPS. Users looking for a consistent 60+ FPS experience should target 1080p Medium or High, or 1440p Medium.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G21 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2500 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, which is a modest clock speed compared to higher-tier cards, but the architecture compensates with efficient execution.

Memory configuration is a key factor in this game’s performance. The B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective transfer rate. For Undisputed, this bandwidth appears sufficient, as the measured FPS at 3840x2160 Medium shows an average of 64 FPS with a minimum of 55 FPS and maximum of 74 FPS, indicating the memory subsystem can handle 4K textures without severe stuttering.

The GPU’s compute resources include 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. It also features 18 ray tracing cores, though the game’s performance data does not specify whether ray tracing is enabled in the tested presets. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s, which are moderate figures that align with the card’s mid-range positioning. FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 23.04 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

Synthetic benchmarks for the GPU show a PassMark G3D score of 14195 and a PassMark GPU Compute score of 7281. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 83514, and the Vulkan score is 96844. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 2649. These numbers place the B570 in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, is just 0.1% slower, while the Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% faster, showing the B570 is well-matched against these alternatives.

The GPU requires a 150 W TDP and uses a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 450 W. It occupies a dual-slot form factor with dimensions of 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, and the card interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8. These specifications make it a straightforward installation in most mid-tower cases, though the PCIe x8 interface may slightly limit performance on older platforms with PCIe 3.0.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset achieves an average of 195 FPS, which is exceptionally high and indicates the GPU is not stressed at this resolution. The Medium preset averages 141 FPS with a minimum of 120 FPS and a maximum of 162 FPS, providing a smooth experience with headroom for dips. The High preset averages 116 FPS, still well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset averages 75 FPS, which is playable but shows a significant drop from High, indicating that the Ultra settings impose a substantial load on the GPU.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. The Low preset averages 141 FPS, matching the 1080p Medium result, which suggests the resolution increase is offset by the lower graphical demands. The Medium preset averages 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS, which is the best balance at this resolution. The High preset averages 84 FPS, still smooth for most displays. The Ultra preset drops to 54 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS target but not unplayable for a sports title where reaction times are less critical.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to struggle with higher presets. The Low preset averages 89 FPS, which is surprisingly strong for 4K and suggests the game is not heavily reliant on texture detail. The Medium preset averages 64 FPS with a minimum of 55 FPS and a maximum of 74 FPS, providing a playable experience with occasional dips below 60 FPS. The High preset averages 53 FPS, which is borderline playable but may feel sluggish during fast-paced animations. The Ultra preset averages 34 FPS, which is not recommended for competitive play.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the gap between presets widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 120 FPS (195 vs 75). At 1440p, the difference narrows to 87 FPS (141 vs 54). At 4K, the difference is 55 FPS (89 vs 34). This indicates that the GPU’s shading units and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors at higher resolutions, while at 1080p the CPU can feed the GPU enough data to maintain high frame rates.

The Medium presets at each resolution show the most stable frame times, as evidenced by the minimum and maximum values being recorded only for that preset. At 1080p, the minimum is 120 FPS and maximum is 162 FPS, a range of 42 FPS. At 1440p, the range is 31 FPS (86 to 117). At 4K, the range is 19 FPS (55 to 74). This tighter variance at higher resolutions suggests the GPU is more consistently loaded, reducing frame time spikes.

Settings Recommendations

For the best overall experience, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 is the standout choice. It delivers an average of 141 FPS with a minimum of 120 FPS, ensuring no drops below the refresh rate of most 60 Hz or 144 Hz monitors. The 120 FPS minimum provides a comfortable buffer against transient stutters, and the average is high enough to take advantage of 144 Hz displays. The jump to High at 116 FPS is modest, but the visual improvements may not justify the 25 FPS average loss for users with high refresh rate screens.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is again the recommended option, averaging 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS. This keeps the experience above 60 FPS at all times and provides a smooth feel for a sports game where animations and physics need to stay fluid. The High preset at 84 FPS is also viable for users who prioritize visual fidelity over raw frame rate, but the Ultra preset at 54 FPS should be avoided because it falls below the 60 FPS threshold and may introduce noticeable judder.

For 3840x2160 users, the Low preset at 89 FPS is the only option that maintains a high frame rate. The Medium preset at 64 FPS is playable but has a minimum of 55 FPS, which could cause perceptible slowdowns during intense moments. The High preset at 53 FPS and Ultra at 34 FPS are not recommended for a smooth experience. If 4K is a priority, the Low preset is the pragmatic choice, though it sacrifices visual detail for performance.

The data suggests that the Medium preset is the sweet spot for this combo across all resolutions. It provides the best balance between graphical quality and frame rate stability, as evidenced by the recorded minimum and maximum FPS values. The Low preset offers higher averages but with diminishing returns in visual quality, while High and Ultra show disproportionate performance costs for incremental visual gains. Users with 60 Hz monitors can comfortably use High at 1080p or 1440p, but those with 144 Hz displays should stick to Medium for the most consistent experience.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Renoir. It operates at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The CPU is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, containing 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. It supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and uses PCIe Gen 3 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a modest L3 allocation compared to newer CPUs, but the gaming performance data shows it is sufficient for Undisputed. The CPU’s integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are present but unused in this configuration with the discrete Intel Arc B570.

Synthetic benchmarks reveal the CPU’s strengths and weaknesses. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 13593 and the single-core score is 1919. The single-core performance is particularly important for gaming, as many titles rely on a few threads for game logic and physics. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 726 in single-thread to 4889 in max threads, indicating that the CPU can utilize all 12 threads effectively when needed. The Geekbench multi-core score is 6637 and single-core is 1460, confirming the CPU’s mid-range positioning.

The PassMark benchmarks provide additional context. The multi-thread score is 15992, the single-thread score is 2653, and the physics score is 676. The integer math score is 50723 and floating-point math is 29947. These numbers are consistent with a CPU that handles everyday tasks and gaming well but does not excel in heavily threaded productivity workloads. The CPU’s percentile of 71 among all CPUs indicates it outperforms 71% of tested processors, which is respectable for a budget-oriented chip.

In the context of Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with frame data and handle game logic. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (195 FPS) suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower graphical settings, as the frame rate is high enough that the GPU is likely the limiting factor. At 1080p Ultra (75 FPS), the CPU still has headroom, as the drop is primarily due to GPU load. The combo rank of 2256 out of 2813 reflects that while the CPU is capable, the overall system is constrained by the GPU’s mid-range performance.

The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and dual-channel DDR4 support are adequate for this game, as Undisputed does not appear to be memory-sensitive based on the consistent FPS across resolutions. The PCIe Gen 3 interface may slightly limit the GPU’s bandwidth compared to PCIe 4.0, but the measured results show no obvious signs of bandwidth starvation. The 65 W TDP makes this CPU easy to cool with a capable air cooler, and its unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the stock performance is already sufficient for this title.