Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers a highly playable experience in Undisputed, with the data showing a clear trend: the RTX 2060 SUPER is the dominant component at higher resolutions, while the 4600G’s 6-core processor keeps pace admirably at 1080p. The measured results indicate a system that is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, though the performance curve reveals specific bottlenecks and optimal settings configurations that are detailed below.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrates how the rendering load shifts across resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces 228.3 FPS, but this falls to 169.1 FPS at 1440p and 106.4 FPS at 4K. This represents a 26% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 37% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The scaling pattern suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly, but at 4K, the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the primary constraint.

The Ultra preset tells a similar story with a steeper curve. At 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 89.7 FPS, dropping to 64.4 FPS at 1440p and 43 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is particularly telling—it falls below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the RTX 2060 SUPER’s 7.181 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient for maxed-out settings at that resolution. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K (106.4 FPS vs 43 FPS) is a 2.5x difference, which highlights how dramatically the visual preset impacts GPU load in this title.

The data shows that the RTX 2060 SUPER is the limiting component in most scenarios. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1440p, but the 4K Ultra result suggests the memory bus and shading units are saturated. The CPU’s 3.7 GHz base clock and 4.2 GHz boost clock provide sufficient single-thread performance for the game’s physics and AI, as evidenced by the 228.3 FPS at 1080p Low, which exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the Medium preset offers the best balance between visual fidelity and frame rate across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the system delivers 164.6 FPS, which is 25% higher than the High preset’s 138.3 FPS and 83% higher than Ultra’s 89.7 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium costs only 28% of the frame rate (228.3 to 164.6 FPS) while providing a significant visual upgrade, making Medium the sweet spot for competitive play.

For 1440p, the Medium preset remains the clear recommendation. The 116.6 FPS at 1440p Medium is well above the 60 FPS threshold and only 32% lower than the Low preset’s 169.1 FPS. The High preset at 1440p drops to 96.9 FPS, which is still playable but leaves less headroom for frame time spikes. The Ultra preset at 1440p (64.4 FPS) is borderline, and the data suggests that the visual differences between High and Ultra do not justify the 33% performance penalty.

At 4K, the recommendation shifts to Low or Medium. The 4K Medium result of 75.6 FPS is the highest playable option, while High (64.2 FPS) is acceptable but close to the edge. The 4K Ultra result of 43 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay. For users prioritizing frame rate consistency, the Low preset at 4K (106.4 FPS) provides a 41% performance advantage over Medium, though the visual compromises are noticeable.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?*

A: Yes, but only with the Low or Medium presets. The measured data shows 106.4 FPS at 4K Low and 75.6 FPS at 4K Medium, both exceeding 60 FPS. The High preset (64.2 FPS) is barely above the threshold, while Ultra (43 FPS) falls short.

Q: What is the best preset for 1080p competitive play?

A: The Medium preset at 1080p delivers 164.6 FPS, which is the optimal balance. The Low preset offers 228.3 FPS, but the 28% frame rate gain over Medium comes with a substantial visual downgrade. The High preset (138.3 FPS) is also viable, but Medium provides the best trade-off.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in overall GPU benchmarks?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER’s average benchmark score is 19774, placing it 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (19680) and 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (19706). It outperforms the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (19623) by 0.8% and the NVIDIA Tesla K40m (19519) by 1.3%.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: Yes, the data suggests CPU limitation at 1080p with lower presets. The 1080p Low result of 228.3 FPS is likely near the CPU’s maximum frame delivery capability, as the GPU has significant headroom at that resolution. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads, scoring 13593 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, are sufficient for the game’s workload.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra presets?

A: The difference varies by resolution. At 1080p, Ultra (89.7 FPS) is 35% slower than High (138.3 FPS). At 1440p, the gap is 34% (64.4 vs 96.9 FPS). At 4K, the gap narrows to 33% (43 vs 64.2 FPS), indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

*Q: How does this system rank among all tested combinations for Undisputed?*

A: The combo ranks 1101 out of 1580 tested combinations, placing it in the 30th percentile. This suggests that while the system is capable of smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, there are many faster configurations in the database.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best performance. The Low preset achieves 228.3 FPS, which is the highest measured result across all resolutions. Medium follows at 164.6 FPS, High at 138.3 FPS, and Ultra at 89.7 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 61% performance drop, with each preset step costing roughly 15-20% of the frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the results show a consistent shift downward. Low delivers 169.1 FPS, Medium 116.6 FPS, High 96.9 FPS, and Ultra 64.4 FPS. The 1440p results are 26-35% lower than their 1080p counterparts, with the largest absolute drop occurring between Low presets (228.3 to 169.1 FPS, a 59.2 FPS reduction). The 1440p Ultra result of 64.4 FPS is notably close to the 4K High result of 64.2 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s rendering capabilities are being stressed similarly in both scenarios.

At 3840x2160, the system’s limitations become apparent. Low delivers 106.4 FPS, Medium 75.6 FPS, High 64.2 FPS, and Ultra 43 FPS. The 4K results are 37-52% lower than 1440p, with the Ultra preset dropping below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The 4K Low result of 106.4 FPS is the only 4K configuration that provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, while the 4K Ultra result of 43 FPS is the weakest measured performance in the entire dataset.

GPU Role

The RTX 2060 SUPER’s specifications directly explain the measured performance. Its base clock of 1470 MHz and boost clock of 1650 MHz provide the raw compute throughput, with the GPU achieving 7.181 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for the texture and geometry data at 1440p but strained at 4K Ultra. The GPU’s 2176 shading units and 64 ROPs handle the pixel work, with a pixel rate of 105.6 GPixel/s that becomes a limiting factor at 4K.

The GPU’s benchmark results corroborate the gaming data. The PassMark G3D score of 16462 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2011 place the GPU in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show how close the performance is: the RTX 2070 scores 19680 (0.5% higher), while the older GTX TITAN scores 19706 (0.3% higher). The GPU’s 34 RT cores and 272 tensor cores are present but not heavily utilized in this sports title, which relies more on traditional rasterization. The 175 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate that thermals are manageable, and the 12 nm process node from TSMC, despite being older, does not appear to cause throttling based on the consistent FPS results.