Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-11400F and Intel Arc B570 pairing in Undisputed presents a study in balanced mid-range hardware, where the final frame rate is dictated less by a single bottleneck and more by the interaction of a six-core CPU with a 10 GB GPU. The data shows a combination that is squarely positioned in the middle of the pack, ranked 2986 out of 3718 tested combos, suggesting that while it is not a top-tier performer, it offers a consistent and predictable experience across the board. The measured results reveal that this system is capable of delivering playable frame rates at 1440p and high refresh rates at 1080p, but the demands of 4K Ultra quickly expose the limits of the GPU. This analysis will break down the specific contributions of each component, how they scale with resolution, and where the optimal settings lie based solely on the measured data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Rocket Lake architecture, built on Intel's 14 nm process. Its base clock is 2.60 GHz, which can boost up to 4.40 GHz, and it has a 12 MB shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU shows a strong single-threaded performance, scoring 868 in 3dmark_single_thread and 2024 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is critical for a sports game like Undisputed that often relies on a primary simulation thread for physics and AI. The multi-threaded results, such as a 14340 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core and a 16908 in Passmark multithread, indicate that the 12 threads are more than sufficient to handle the game's background tasks, like opponent AI and match logic, without becoming a limiting factor.

The CPU's performance percentile of 71 against all CPUs places it in a solid mid-range tier. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD EPYC 7H12 (0.3% faster), Intel Core i5-12450H (0.4% slower), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G (0.6% slower), and Intel Core Ultra 7 164U (0.6% faster). These deltas are negligible, meaning the i5-11400F is effectively on par with a diverse set of server, mobile, and desktop chips in general compute tasks. For Undisputed, this level of performance is likely more than adequate; the 6-core configuration ensures that even if the game engine attempts to use multiple threads, there is ample headroom. The game's reliance on a stable frame rate for animation and input is well-served by a CPU that can maintain high single-thread throughput, as evidenced by its 204 score in Cinebench R15 single-core.

Looking at the measured FPS data, it is evident that the CPU is not the primary constraint in most scenarios. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 195 FPS, a very high number that suggests the CPU can feed the GPU with enough draw calls to keep it busy. If the CPU were severely limited, we would expect to see frame rates plateau at a lower number regardless of resolution or settings. The fact that FPS scales dramatically with resolution and graphics presets points to the GPU being the dominant factor in determining performance. The CPU's role here is to provide a stable foundation, and the data indicates it does so effectively, allowing the GPU's performance to be the deciding factor in the final output. The 65W TDP also suggests this is an efficient part that won't introduce thermal throttling issues that could cause frame-time spikes in a fast-paced boxing match.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B570 is the clear performance driver in this pairing. It is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage) using a 5 nm process at TSMC, featuring 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The GPU operates at a consistent 2500 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) across a 160-bit bus. This translates to 380.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is a crucial figure for a game like Undisputed that must stream high-resolution textures for fighter models and arena environments. The 10 GB of GDDR6 VRAM is a notable feature, as it provides a comfortable buffer for 1440p and even 4K textures without spilling over into system memory, which can cause stuttering.

In terms of raw compute, the Arc B570 delivers 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. Its synthetic benchmark scores, including a 14195 in Passmark G3D and a 2649 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), place it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are very closely matched: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.1% faster, the Intel Arc A750 is 0.1% slower, the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% slower. This indicates the B570 sits in a performance class that trades blows with last-generation high-end mobile parts and previous-gen desktop mid-rangers, making it a capable 1080p and 1440p card.

The GPU's role in the measured FPS is unmistakable. When settings are increased from Low to Ultra at any resolution, there is a significant drop in average FPS, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario. For instance, at 1080p, the average FPS drops from 195 on Low to 75 on Ultra, a 61.5% reduction. This scaling is directly related to the GPU's workload: higher presets increase the shading complexity, texture filtering, and draw distance, all of which are processed by the GPU's shading units and ROPs. The 10 GB VRAM size is sufficient for the Ultra preset at 1080p and 1440p, but the data suggests that at 4K Ultra (34 FPS), the GPU's compute throughput and bandwidth are simply overwhelmed. The B570 is a solid performer, but Undisputed at high settings demands more than it can deliver at the highest resolution.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combo scales across the three tested resolutions. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 116 at 1080p to 84 at 1440p and then to 53 at 4K. This is a 27.6% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 36.9% drop from 1440p to 4K. This non-linear scaling is characteristic of a GPU that is becoming progressively more saturated as pixel count increases. The jump from 1080p to 1440p increases the pixel count by 1.78 times, but the FPS only drops by a factor of 1.38, indicating the GPU still has some headroom. The jump to 4K increases the pixel count by another 2.25 times, but the FPS drops by a factor of 1.58, suggesting the GPU is hitting a wall where memory bandwidth and compute are no longer sufficient to maintain the same efficiency.

Looking at the Low settings, the scaling is even more revealing. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 195 FPS, which drops to 141 at 1440p (a 27.7% drop) and then to 89 at 4K (a 36.9% drop). The percentage drops are nearly identical to the High settings, which is interesting. This suggests that even at the lowest graphical fidelity, the GPU is still the limiting factor, as the CPU is capable of maintaining a higher frame rate than the GPU can output. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see the FPS at 1080p Low to be capped at a similar value to 1080p High, since the CPU's workload is less affected by resolution. Since the FPS scales with resolution even on Low, it confirms that the Intel Arc B570 is the primary constraint in this system.

The Medium settings at 1440p and 4K provide the only min/max FPS data in the pack, showing a 102 average with a range of 86 to 117 at 1440p, and a 64 average with a range of 55 to 74 at 4K. The relative stability of the frame times at these settings (a variance of about 30 FPS in the max-min range) suggests that while the GPU is heavily loaded, it is not experiencing catastrophic frame drops, which would be expected if it were running out of VRAM. This reinforces the idea that the B570's 10 GB memory is adequate for these settings, and the performance ceiling is due to the GPU's compute power. The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the GPU can maintain high frame rates, while 4K is only playable at lower presets.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's resolution and refresh rate priorities. For a standard 60 Hz display, the 4K Medium preset is the only viable option at that resolution, with an average of 64 FPS. This is perfectly playable and provides a better visual experience than the 4K Low preset (89 FPS) because it includes higher-quality textures and effects, while still staying comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The 4K High preset (53 FPS) and Ultra (34 FPS) are not recommended for smooth gameplay, as the average FPS falls below the 60 FPS target, likely resulting in noticeable judder.

For 1440p, the High preset is the sweet spot for a high-refresh-rate monitor. The 84 FPS average is well above the 60 FPS mark and is smooth enough for a fast-paced sports title. The Medium preset (102 FPS) is also excellent if the user prefers a higher frame rate over visual fidelity, and the data shows it has a stable frame time range. The 1440p Ultra preset (54 FPS) is playable but dips below the 60 FPS target, so it is only recommended if the user prioritizes maximum graphical detail over a perfectly smooth experience. The 1440p Low preset (141 FPS) is overkill for most displays and leaves significant visual quality on the table, so it is not recommended.

At 1080p, the data shows this combo is capable of very high frame rates. The High preset (116 FPS) is the best balance of visual quality and performance, easily pushing past 100 FPS for a smooth experience on 144Hz displays. The Medium preset (141 FPS) is also a great choice for competitive play, offering a significant frame rate boost with a modest visual sacrifice. The Ultra preset (75 FPS) is the highest quality option and is perfectly playable, but it does not take full advantage of a 144Hz monitor. The Low preset (195 FPS) is only useful for esports-level competitive play where maximum frame rate is the sole priority. Overall, the data suggests that Medium to High settings at 1080p and 1440p deliver the best experience, balancing visual fidelity with a frame rate that is well above playable thresholds.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo of the Intel Core i5-11400F and Intel Arc B570 is ranked 2986 out of 3718 tested combinations in Undisputed. This places it in the 20th percentile of all tested systems, meaning that roughly 80% of the other hardware combinations tested performed better in this specific game. This is a significant finding, as it suggests that while the individual components are competent mid-range parts, their combination does not boost them to a higher performance tier in this title. The rank is likely influenced by the fact that Undisputed is a GPU-intensive game, and the B570, while capable, is not a high-end graphics card.

To put this rank in perspective, the CPU's percentile of 71 and the GPU's percentile of 65 are both higher than the combo's rank percentile of 20. This discrepancy indicates that the performance in Undisputed is not just about the average synthetic benchmark scores of the parts, but also about how well they work together for this specific workload. The game may have specific engine characteristics that are more sensitive to certain GPU features or driver optimizations, which could penalize the Arc B570's performance relative to its synthetic scores. The fact that the combo ranks so low is a clear indicator that this pairing is not optimized for this game, despite the hardware being capable in other tasks.

The rank of 2986 out of 3718 is a stark warning that users should not expect high-end performance in Undisputed from this system. While the measured FPS at 1080p and 1440p are respectable, the low rank suggests that many other systems with similar or even lower-tier components can achieve better results. This could be due to the game's engine favoring NVIDIA or AMD GPUs, or it could be that the Intel Arc B570's drivers are not fully optimized for this title. The data is clear: this is a below-average performer in this specific game, regardless of the individual component scores. Users looking to play Undisputed at high settings and high resolutions may want to consider a different GPU, as this combo is better suited for other genres or less demanding titles.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following is the complete breakdown of measured average FPS for this combo in Undisputed:

1080p (1920x1080)

• Low: 195 FPS average
• Medium: 141 FPS average (min 120, max 162)
• High: 116 FPS average
• Ultra: 75 FPS average

1440p (2560x1440)

• Low: 141 FPS average
• Medium: 102 FPS average (min 86, max 117)
• High: 84 FPS average
• Ultra: 54 FPS average

4K (3840x2160)

• Low: 89 FPS average
• Medium: 64 FPS average (min 55, max 74)
• High: 53 FPS average
• Ultra: 34 FPS average

This data shows a clear pattern of diminishing returns as resolution increases. At 1080p, the combo is capable of maintaining high frame rates across all settings, with even the Ultra preset hitting 75 FPS. At 1440p, the Ultra preset drops to 54 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At 4K, only the Low and Medium presets manage to stay above 60 FPS, with High and Ultra falling well below. The min and max FPS data for the Medium preset at each resolution shows a consistent frame time variance, indicating that the game is running in a stable manner without major stutters, but the GPU is clearly the bottleneck as resolution increases. The data suggests that for a consistent 60+ FPS experience, users should stick to 1080p Ultra or 1440p High, while 4K gaming is limited to Medium settings or lower.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a 60 FPS experience?

A: The measured data shows that this combo can achieve 60+ FPS at 1440p on High settings (84 FPS average) and at 4K on Medium settings (64 FPS average). For a smoother experience on higher refresh rate monitors, 1080p Ultra (75 FPS) is also viable.

*Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this system for Undisputed?*

A: The data clearly indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. This is evidenced by the significant FPS drops when increasing resolution at the same settings (e.g., 116 FPS at 1080p High to 53 FPS at 4K High). If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain constant across resolutions.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested systems?

A: The combo is ranked 2986 out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 20% of all tested systems for this game. This is lower than the individual component percentiles (CPU at 71, GPU at 65) suggest.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 1440p?

A: The measured average FPS for 1440p Ultra is 54 FPS. While this is playable, it falls below the 60 FPS target that many consider the standard for smooth gameplay, so it is not recommended for a consistently fluid experience.

Q: What is the role of the 10 GB VRAM on the Intel Arc B570?

A: The 10 GB of GDDR6 VRAM is sufficient for the game's texture requirements at 1080p and 1440p, as evidenced by the stable frame times at Medium settings. It does not appear to be a limiting factor in the measured results, as the performance drops are more consistent with compute limitations.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The B570's average benchmark score is 20556. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% faster), Intel Arc A750 (0.1% slower), NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (0.4% faster), and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (0.5% slower). This places it in a tight performance band with these parts.