The Technomancer

This page presents the measured performance data for _The Technomancer_ (released June 27, 2016) using the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F processor paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti graphics card. The dataset includes average, minimum, and maximum FPS for four quality presets across three resolutions, as well as global ranking information for this hardware combination. All frames per second figures below are taken directly from our measured rows, and the analysis stays strictly within the bounds of that data.

Resolution Scaling

The most striking pattern in the data is how consistently average FPS declines as the resolution moves from 1920×1080 to 3840×2160. At High quality, the progression is 152 → 99 → 54. Switching to Low gives values of 202 → 151 → 83. Medium settings stride from 178 at 1080p down to 116 at 1440p and then to 64 at 4K, while Ultra runs at 119, 77, 43 respectively. This suggests a solid GPU‑bound behavior across all presets; the RTX 3080 Ti has enough shading power to sustain high frame rates at 1080p, but the cost of pixel count at 4K pulls even the lower presets down.

The minimum frame rate column tells a similarly clear story. Only the Medium preset includes MIN/MAX values in the measurement set. At 4K Medium, the average is 64 with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 73. At 1440p Medium, the min–max range spans 99 to 134, while at 1080p Medium it goes from 151 to 204. These numbers indicate that the 4K minimum of 54 can temporarily dip below the 60 FPS threshold, but the 1440p and 1080p levels stay well above that level.

Given that scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K roughly represents a doubling of pixel count at each step, the measured drops (e.g., High 152→99→54, Low 202→151→83) follow the expected pattern of resolution‑limited rendering. The fact that the Ultra preset at 4K averages 43 FPS — a sub‑30 result — shows that the RTX 3080 Ti’s raster throughput is the principal bottleneck at high resolutions, and the CPU does not enter the picture here. At 1080p, however, values such as 202 average on Low and 204 on Medium Max prove that the 5600F’s single‑thread and multi‑thread capabilities are more than sufficient to feed the GPU. In short, the 5600F allows the GPU to stretch its legs at 1080p and 1440p; at 4K the GPU is the deciding factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the 1080p average FPS on the Medium preset for this combo?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F + RTX 3080 Ti combination yields an average of 178 FPS, with measured lows of 151 and a max of 204 at 1920×1080 Medium.

Q: How does this rig perform at 2560×1440 with High settings?

A: At 1440p High, the average frame rate is 99 fps. No min or max values are given for High, but the Medium preset (which has min/max data) shows that variations range from 99 to 134.

Q: What is the overall standing of this CPU/GPU system among all tested The Technomancer configs?

A: The combination is ranked 1014 out of 3696 tested configs, placing it comfortably in the upper portion of the test pool.

Q: How many physical cores does the Ryzen 5 5600F have and what is its boost clock?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base frequency of 3.00 GHz and a boost frequency of 4.00 GHz.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti?

A: The launch MSRP of the RTX 3080 Ti is 1,199 USD.

Q: Does the system sustain 60+ FPS at 4K on any setting?

A: The 4K Low preset averages 83, and 4K Medium reaches an average of 64, but the Medium setting’s minimum is 54, so the average stays above 60 while dips can go below it.

Settings Recommendations

Choosing the right preset depends on the resolution you plan to use. At 1920×1080, the Hard 3080 Ti and Ryzen 5 5600F hit 152 on High, 178 on Medium, 202 on Low, and 119 on Ultra. Since the gap between Medium and High is small compared with the step to Ultra, 1080p gamers can safely enable High or even Ultra and still be at considerable headroom, but if you need absolute smoothness at a 244 FPS native display, Medium’s average of 178 gives you an acceptable margin above a 144Hz screen.

For 2560×1440, Medium posts an average of 118 FPS (min 99, max 134), while High averages 99 and Ultra 77. The data suggests that at 1440p the Medium setting is the sweet spot: it retains all the screen realism of the resolution down to a very high frame rate, and the minimum of 99 keeps you far above 60 Hz in the heaviest scenes. High is still playable, but its 99 average leaves less overhead for heavy scenes that might dip lower.

At 3840×2160, only Low (83) and Medium (64) reach an average above 60. High sits at 54 and Ultra drops to 43. Since the Medium average is 64, with a minimum of 54 in the included measurements, it;s likely to see occasional a scene cross the 60 Hz line, but that may still be acceptable for a 60 Hz monitor. For perfectly stable 4K gaming, you would have to drop to Low, which is at 83 average, or, alternatively, choose Medium and accept a few typical dips. There is no universal ‘best’ setting across all three resolutions; the data composition is consistent and the place where you can run everything.

Ultimately, the measurement set suggests that 90% of the time players should choose the Medium preset at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K owners will have to decide between the smooth average of 64 on Medium or the doubled headroom of Low (83) if they prioritize consistency.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table lists all measured frame rates from the supplied dataset. All numbers are taken directly from the 12 measurements.

| Resolution | Preset | Average FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|-----------|--------|-------------|---------|---------|

| 3840×2160 | High | 54 | – | – |

| 3840×2160 | Low | 83 | – | – |

| 3840×2160 | Medium | 64 | 54 | 73 |

| 3840×2160 | Ultra | 43 | – | – |

| 2560×1440 | High | 99 | – | – |

| 2560×1440 | Low | 151 | – | – |

| 2560×1440 | Medium | 116 | 99 | 134 |

| 2560×1440 | Ultra | 77 | – | – |

| 1920×1080 | High | 152 | – | – |

| 1920×1080 | Low | 202 | – | – |

| 1920×1080 | Medium | 178 | 151 | 204 |

| 1920×1080 | Ultra | 119 | – | – |

These rows make it easy to see the global trend: scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K costs about 45‑50% performance at each jump. That is the signature of a heavily GPU‑bound workload. The minimums given for Medium at all resolutions show how frame times vary; at 4K there’s a 19 FPS span between min and max, while at 1080p the span is 53 FPS, suggesting the 3080 Ti's 12GB of GDDR6X memory with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth helps stabilize a high frame rate at lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The specific Ryzen 5 5600F + RTX 3080 Ti configuration is placed 1014th out of 3699 in The Technomancer, based on our measured runs. That rank places it in the top 28% of all tested combos (the exact percentile is not given in the pack, but 1014 of 3699 is comfortably above the median). When looking at the individual components, the CPU holds an 85th percentile among all processors, and the GPU is at the 83rd percentile among graphics cards. Those two numbers are consistent with the overall ranking – a solid upper‑tier pairing. It's not near the very top, but the in‑game data show that this combo delivers very high FPS values on the measured settings, so it belongs in the same performance tier as much more expensive systems.

The nearest‑rival data for the CPU confirms that the 5600F is in the same ballpark as several modern parts: it sits lightly below the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, while being slightly faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and i9‑12900T (with minimal deltas between 0.2 and 0.5). For the GPU, the RTX 3080 Ti is close to the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (0.8% delta) and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (‑1.2%), and runs slightly ahead of the Tesla M40 and the RTX 5070 (2% delta). These comparisons give context for the raw numbers: the 3080 Ti’s overall compute power is at the same level as these cards, and its average G3D score of 26896 and FP32 compute of 34.10 TFLOPS underscore its ability to drive modern titles at 1440p very well.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 5600F is an interesting companion to the RTX 3080 Ti in this game. Its 6 cores / 12 threads with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost of 4.00 GHz, built on Zen 3 architecture and a 32 MB shared L3 cache, deliver a strong single‑thread and multi‑thread floor. In the passmark tests for this CPU, the multithread score is 19,236 and single‑thread 2,872, which place it at a 85th percentile among all processors. The Technomancer, being a 2016 title, is not known for heavy core utilization; the data suggests that the CPU never becomes a real bottleneck. For example, at the lowest 1080p the average FPS reaches 202 on the interval, and the max at 1080p Medium peaks to 28, so the frame rate is clearly top‑heavy on maximum GPU utilization.

The measured FPS at 1080p Low (202) and Medium (178) are high enough that even a more budget CPU with a weaker GPU would struggle to match. The 5600F’s 6 cores are still competitive with many current CPUs, and the 32 MB L3 cache helps in help in caching game logic. The game's system requirements for 2016 typically expect at most 4‑thread processors, so the 5600F not only covers the range but allows plenty of compute headroom for background tasks. The result: The resolution scaling analysis shows that scaling from 1080p to 4Kp drops FPS by more than 3× (202 → 83), which is a phenomenon driven by the pixel fill and lighting ▶ the GPU, not the CPU. Thus, the 5600F is a fine match for the 3080 Ti in The Technomancer, letting the RTX 3080 Ti give very high performance without the CPU constriction seen in more UMD – titles.