The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 114 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 43 | 54 | 64 | 83 |
| 1440p QHD | 77 | 99 | 116 | 151 |
| 1080p Full HD | 119 | 152 | 178 | 231 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, is not a modern graphical showcase, but the combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti produces a wide spread of performance across resolutions and settings. The data reveals a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance becomes a factor only when the graphical load is lightened. The measured FPS figures demonstrate that this pairing is capable of delivering smooth gameplay at 1440p and 1080p, but 4K Ultra remains a challenging target.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and clearly illustrates where the bottleneck lies. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 152 at 1920x1080 to 99 at 2560x1440, a 34.9% reduction, and then to 54 at 3840x2160, a further 45.5% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep decline is a classic indication of GPU saturation; the RTX 3080 Ti is working progressively harder to fill the increasing pixel count. The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings, with the most severe penalties occurring as the resolution moves towards 4K.
The trend is even more pronounced at Ultra settings. The average frame rate at 1080p Ultra is 119 FPS, dropping to 77 FPS at 1440p and then to a demanding 43 FPS at 4K. The difference between 1080p and 4K Ultra is a 63.9% reduction in performance. This suggests that for the most demanding visual preset, the RTX 3080 Ti's limits are reached quickly as resolution increases. The game’s engine, despite its age, appears to have a heavy pixel-throughput requirement that scales directly with resolution.
Conversely, the scaling from 1080p to 1440p is less punishing than from 1440p to 4K. For instance, at Medium settings, the drop from 178 FPS at 1080p to 116 FPS at 1440p is a 34.8% decrease, but moving from 116 FPS at 1440p to 64 FPS at 4K is a 44.8% decrease. This non-linear scaling confirms that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are being taxed exponentially as the pixel count increases, making 4K the primary hurdle for this combo. The data suggests that for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 4K, users will need to stick to High settings or lower, as the 54 FPS average at High falls just short of the target.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the defining component in this pairing. Its specifications, including 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, provide a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, which is crucial for feeding the high pixel rates demanded at 4K. The GPU is built on the Ampere architecture with 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units, enabling a pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s. These specs directly correlate with the measured FPS; the card’s raw fillrate is sufficient for 1440p High (99 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (119 FPS), but the 4K Ultra setting (43 FPS) shows the limits of its 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 compute.
The boost clock of 1665 MHz is a modest figure, but the sheer number of cores compensates for the clock speed. The GPU's performance percentile of 83 versus all GPUs places it firmly in the upper tier, and its benchmark scores reflect this. The Passmark G3D score of 26896 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 are consistent with its position as a high-end card. In terms of direct rivals, the RTX 3080 Ti’s average benchmark score of 41187 is 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and 2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, showing it remains competitive even against newer parts.
The 12 GB VRAM capacity appears sufficient for The Technomancer. Even at 4K Ultra, where the frame rate drops to 43 FPS, there is no evidence in the data of a VRAM-related crash or stutter, as the minimum FPS for the Medium setting at 4K is 54. The memory clock of 19 Gbps effective, combined with the 384-bit bus, provides ample bandwidth for the game’s textures and geometry. The GPU’s role is clearly as the primary performance limiter; the FPS scales inversely with resolution in a predictable manner, indicating that the card’s compute and memory subsystems are being fully utilized at the higher settings.
FAQ
Q: Can this CPU and GPU combination run The Technomancer at 4K smoothly?
A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 43, which is below the 60 FPS target. However, at 4K High, the average FPS is 54, and at 4K Medium, it is 64. The data shows that 4K is playable if settings are tuned down from the maximum.
Q: What is the best resolution to play at for a high refresh rate experience?
A: For high refresh rates, 1080p is the best choice. The average FPS at 1080p High is 152, and at 1080p Low it reaches 231. This provides a significant headroom above 144 Hz monitors. At 1440p, the average FPS at High settings is 99, which is still suitable for 100 Hz displays.
Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 a bottleneck at any point?
A: The data suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is entirely consistent with GPU limitations. However, the CPU's high single-thread performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655, is likely a contributing factor in achieving the high frame rates at 1080p Low (231 FPS), where the GPU has less work to do.
Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: According to the average benchmark score, the RTX 3080 Ti (41187) is 2% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377) and 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870). It is 1.2% slower than the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41707).
Q: What is the impact of the game’s settings on performance at 1440p?
A: At 1440p, the average FPS ranges from 151 at Low settings to 77 at Ultra settings. The step from High (99 FPS) to Ultra (77 FPS) is a 22.2% performance hit, while the step from Low to High is a 34.4% hit. This suggests that High settings offer a good balance of visual quality and performance at this resolution.
Q: Does the combo’s rank in the database reflect its gaming performance?
A: The combo ranks 687 out of 2825 tested combinations, placing it in the top 24.3% of all tested combos. This is a strong ranking, but it should be interpreted as a general measure of overall performance, not a specific indicator for The Technomancer, where the GPU is clearly the dominant factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally fast. The Low preset yields an average of 231 FPS, with the Medium preset at 178 FPS (min 151, max 204), High at 152 FPS, and Ultra at 119 FPS. All 1080p presets are above 100 FPS, confirming that this resolution is not a challenge for the RTX 3080 Ti.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains very good. The Low preset averages 151 FPS, which is still extremely high. The Medium preset averages 116 FPS (min 99, max 134), High averages 99 FPS, and Ultra drops to 77 FPS. The 1440p results show a clear tiering, with the difference between Low and Ultra being significant, but even the Ultra preset remains playable.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s workload becomes the central story. The Low preset averages 83 FPS, which is respectable for 4K. The Medium preset averages 64 FPS (min 54, max 73), and High averages 54 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only one that falls below the 50 FPS mark, averaging 43 FPS. The data shows that at 4K, users should target Medium or High settings for a stable 60 FPS experience, while Ultra is only for those willing to accept a lower frame rate.
The min and max FPS data for the Medium preset at each resolution shows a consistent variance. At 1080p, the frame time variance is from 151 to 204 FPS, a range of 53 FPS. At 1440p, the range is 35 FPS (99 to 134). At 4K, the range is 19 FPS (54 to 73). This tightening of the frame rate range at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is consistently saturated, leading to less variance in frame times. Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU has more headroom, allowing for larger spikes and dips in performance.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti holds a rank of 687 out of 2825 combos. This positions it in the 75.7th percentile of all tested systems, indicating a strong overall performer. The rank is a composite measure, but the game-specific data shows that this ranking is justified by the high frame rates achieved at 1080p and 1440p.
While the combo rank provides a useful summary, it is important to contextualize it with the game’s specific demands. The Technomancer appears to be heavily GPU-bound, as evidenced by the resolution scaling. Therefore, the combo’s rank is likely more influenced by the GPU’s performance than the CPU’s. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 36938 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with a score of 36945, a 0% delta. This high CPU percentile ensures that the processor is not a limiting factor for the GPU in most scenarios.
The GPU’s percentile of 83 versus all GPUs is slightly lower than the CPU’s, but its absolute performance is what drives the high FPS numbers. The rank of 687 out of 2825 combos suggests that there are many systems with higher raw performance, but for this specific game, the measured results show that this combo is more than capable. The performance is not the top of the line, but it is well above the median, making it a solid choice for this title.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. Its base clock is 3.30 GHz, and it boosts up to 4.90 GHz. While it has no hyper-threading, its high boost clock and modern architecture deliver strong single-threaded performance, which is critical for gaming. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655 and Passmark single-thread score of 4412 are indicators of this strength. This is important because The Technomancer, like many games, relies heavily on a single primary thread for game logic.
The CPU’s role in this combo is to feed the GPU with enough data to avoid becoming a bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the average FPS of 231 suggests that the CPU is capable of handling a very high frame rate. The Passmark multithread score of 30459 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891 indicate that the 10 cores are also capable of handling background tasks and game physics. The L3 cache of 20 MB shared is a decent amount, but the game’s performance is not heavily dependent on cache size, as the scaling is primarily resolution-driven.
Compared to its rivals, the Core Ultra 5 225 is competitive. Its average benchmark score of 36938 is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945), with a 0% delta. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018) and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900T (37112). This means that for this game, the CPU choice is unlikely to cause a significant difference in performance, as the RTX 3080 Ti is the limiting factor at most settings. The CPU’s 65 W TDP also suggests it runs cool and efficiently, though this is a qualitative observation not directly measured in the game FPS data.
The data indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck until the CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p Low. Here, the FPS reaches 231, which confirms the CPU’s single-core speed. In all other tested configurations, the GPU workload dominates. Therefore, the Core Ultra 5 225 is an adequate partner for the RTX 3080 Ti, providing enough processing power to not hinder the GPU’s performance in this particular game, while its strong single-thread capabilities ensure that it can push very high frame rates when the graphical load is low.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 225
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 83.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 43.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 151.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 116.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 99.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 77.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 231.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 178.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 152.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 119.0 |
The Technomancer with iUltra 5 225 + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 225 + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.