The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
94
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 94 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 45 53 69
1440p QHD 64 82 96 125
1080p Full HD 98 125 147 191

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 53
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Ultra 35
2560x1440 Low 125
2560x1440 Medium 96
2560x1440 High 82
2560x1440 Ultra 64
1920x1080 Low 191
1920x1080 Medium 147
1920x1080 High 125
1920x1080 Ultra 98

The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting stress profile for modern hardware. This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination, using measured frame rate data to determine how the system scales across resolutions and settings. The data indicates a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh 1080p gaming but becomes increasingly GPU-limited at higher resolutions, a typical scenario for a title from this era.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At the High preset, the average frame rate drops from 125 FPS at 1080p to 82 FPS at 1440p, a 34% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K (3840x2160), the average further declines to 45 FPS, representing a 45% drop from the 1440p figure and a 64% drop from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario.

The scaling pattern suggests that the RTX 3070's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and its 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary limiting factors at higher resolutions. The data shows that the transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly a third of the performance, while the jump to 4K costs another half of the remaining performance. This is not linear scaling; it is geometric, indicating that memory bandwidth and pixel throughput are being saturated.

At the Low preset, the scaling is even more dramatic, though from a higher baseline. The system delivers 191 FPS at 1080p, drops to 125 FPS at 1440p, and then falls to 69 FPS at 4K. The 4K result represents just 36% of the 1080p performance, a more significant relative drop than seen at High settings. This suggests that at Low settings, where the shading workload is reduced, the memory subsystem becomes the bottleneck even more quickly as resolution climbs.

The Medium preset provides the most complete data, including minimum and maximum frame rates. At 1080p Medium, the average is 147 FPS with a minimum of 125 FPS, while at 1440p Medium the average is 96 FPS with a minimum of 82 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average drops to 53 FPS with a minimum of 45 FPS. The minimum frame rates scale proportionally with the averages, suggesting consistent performance without sudden stutters or drops, pointing to a stable, if heavily loaded, GPU.

The data indicates that for this title, the RTX 3070 is not sufficient to maintain 60 FPS at 4K on any preset, as even the Low preset only manages an average of 69 FPS. The component limiting factor shifts from a balanced CPU/GPU load at 1080p to a definitive GPU limitation at 1440p and 4K. The Ryzen 5 5600F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, appears to have ample headroom to keep up with the GPU at lower resolutions, but its role diminishes as the resolution increases.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate the RTX 3070 can achieve with this CPU in The Technomancer?

A: The highest measured average is 191 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. The High preset at 1080p yields 125 FPS.

Q: Can this combination handle 4K gaming at 60 FPS?

A: No. The maximum average at 3840x2160 is 69 FPS on Low settings. At Medium settings, the average drops to 53 FPS, and at High it falls to 45 FPS. No 4K preset achieves a 60 FPS average.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p on High settings?

A: The average frame rate drops from 125 FPS at 1080p to 82 FPS at 1440p, a loss of 43 FPS or approximately 34% of the performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1440p resolution?

A: The data suggests a GPU limitation. At 1440p High, the system averages 82 FPS. Given that the CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 4.00 GHz boost clock, it is unlikely to be the primary bottleneck at this resolution and setting level.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: The average frame rate drops from 191 FPS on Low to 98 FPS on Ultra. This represents a 93 FPS difference, meaning the Ultra preset runs at roughly half the frame rate of the Low preset.

Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM of the RTX 3070 appear to be a problem at any tested setting?

A: The data indicates performance scales consistently with resolution, suggesting the VRAM is managed effectively. However, the significant drop in performance at 4K, where the average at High is 45 FPS, suggests that capacity and bandwidth are heavily taxed.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For a 60 FPS target at 1080p, the Ultra preset is not viable, as it averages 98 FPS but likely dips lower. The Medium preset, with an average of 147 FPS and a minimum of 125 FPS, is the sweet spot for high-refresh monitors, providing a substantial performance buffer above 60 FPS.

For 1440p, the High preset, averaging 82 FPS, offers the best balance for a 60 FPS experience, providing headroom above the target. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 96 FPS, which is ideal for 75Hz or 100Hz displays, but High is a safer choice for strict 60 FPS v-sync. The Ultra preset at 1440p, averaging 64 FPS, is borderline for a 60 FPS target; while the average is above 60, the lack of min/max data makes it a riskier choice.

At 4K, no preset can consistently deliver 60 FPS. The Low preset, with an average of 69 FPS, is the only option that approaches playable frame rates, but it will still have drops below 60. The Medium preset at 4K, averaging 53 FPS, is likely the best visual compromise for a 30 FPS target, as it sits comfortably above that threshold. For users prioritizing smoothness at 4K, the Low preset is the only recommendation from the measured data.

The data suggests that the Medium preset provides the best "experience" per the measured rows, as it is the only setting level that offers a complete set of min/avg/max data points. Across all resolutions, the Medium preset demonstrates a predictable and stable performance envelope. For a general recommendation on a 1440p monitor, High settings are optimal, offering a strong visual upgrade over Medium with playable frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates high performance across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 191 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. The Medium preset averages 147 FPS, with a minimum of 125 FPS and a maximum of 169 FPS, indicating a tight performance band. High settings average 125 FPS, while Ultra settings average 98 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decrease in performance, with the Ultra preset delivering roughly 51% of the Low preset's frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops are significant but keep the system in playable territory. The Low preset averages 125 FPS, a 66 FPS drop from 1080p. Medium settings average 96 FPS, with a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS. High settings average 82 FPS, which is a substantial 43 FPS drop from the 1080p High result. Ultra settings at 1440p average 64 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. The Low preset averages 69 FPS, making it the only 4K setting above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 53 FPS, with a minimum of 45 FPS and a maximum of 61 FPS. High settings drop to an average of 45 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 35 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is less than half the frame rate of the 1080p High result, illustrating the extreme load placed on the GPU at this resolution.

The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 3070 is capable of high refresh rates at 1080p, but the performance scales down rapidly with resolution. The minimum frame rates recorded at Medium settings (125 FPS at 1080p, 82 FPS at 1440p, 45 FPS at 4K) suggest that even the lowest dips remain playable at 1080p and 1440p, but become borderline at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for The Technomancer, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks at position 1179 out of 2825 tested combos. This places the system in the 58th percentile of all tested configurations, indicating it performs better than a majority of setups but is not among the top tier.

The ranking suggests that while this is a capable combination, there are many other hardware pairings that deliver higher frame rates in this specific title. The RTX 3070, while a strong GPU, is not the most powerful option available, and the Ryzen 5 5600F, despite being a solid 6-core processor, is not a top-tier CPU. The mid-pack ranking reflects the balanced but not extreme nature of this hardware combo.

Comparing this to the CPU's own benchmark percentile, which stands at 85th versus all CPUs, and the GPU's percentile of 61st versus all GPUs, the in-game ranking is lower than the CPU's relative standing but close to the GPU's. This suggests that the game's performance is more heavily influenced by the GPU, which is consistent with the resolution scaling analysis. The CPU has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does.

The rank of 1179 out of 2825 implies that the RTX 3070 is the limiting factor in most scenarios, as the CPU is more highly ranked relative to its competition. This information, combined with the measured FPS data, indicates that users looking to improve performance should focus on GPU upgrades rather than CPU changes, as the current processor is less of a bottleneck.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The processor features a shared 32 MB L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Its PassMark single-thread score is 2872, and its multi-thread score is 19236, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs.

In The Technomancer, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 191 FPS, a very high frame rate that requires a capable CPU to feed the GPU. The Ryzen 5 5600F, with its high single-thread performance (PassMark score of 2872), is well-suited for this task, ensuring the GPU is not starved of data.

However, the CPU's influence diminishes as resolution increases. The data shows a clear GPU bottleneck at 1440p and 4K, where the frame rates drop dramatically despite the CPU's capabilities. The CPU is likely not the limiting factor in these scenarios, as the GPU is struggling to render the increased pixel count. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration is more than sufficient for a game from 2016, which is unlikely to utilize more than a few cores effectively.

The CPU's benchmark scores provide context for its performance. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, has an average score of 36938, which is essentially identical to the Ryzen 5 5600F's average of 36945. This indicates that the CPU is performing as expected for its class. The data suggests that for this game, the CPU provides a stable foundation, but it is the GPU that determines the final frame rate, especially at higher settings and resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture and features 5888 shading units. It operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1725 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its PassMark G3D score is 22214, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU is the primary performance driver in The Technomancer, as evidenced by the resolution scaling data. The steep drop in frame rates from 1080p to 4K is a clear indicator of GPU limitation. At 1080p High, the GPU delivers 125 FPS, but this falls to 45 FPS at 4K High, a 64% reduction. This dramatic scaling is due to the increasing pixel load and the VRAM bandwidth requirements.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor. The data shows that at 4K, the performance drops significantly, suggesting that the memory subsystem is heavily taxed. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, it becomes a bottleneck. The GPU's 8 nm process node and 220 W TDP indicate a high-performance part that generates significant heat, but the benchmark data shows it is capable of high frame rates at lower resolutions.

The GPU's benchmark position, in the 61st percentile, is lower than the CPU's 85th percentile, which aligns with the in-game performance ranking. The RTX 3070's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, has a similar average score of 17083, indicating that the RTX 3070 is competitively positioned. However, the measured FPS data in this game shows that the GPU is the limiting factor, and its performance characteristics dictate the playable settings and resolutions for this combination.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 4000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1725 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 69.0
3840x2160 Medium 53.0
3840x2160 High 45.0
3840x2160 Ultra 35.0
2560x1440 Low 125.0
2560x1440 Medium 96.0
2560x1440 High 82.0
2560x1440 Ultra 64.0
1920x1080 Low 191.0
1920x1080 Medium 147.0
1920x1080 High 125.0
1920x1080 Ultra 98.0

The Technomancer with Ryzen 5 5600F + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600F + RTX 3070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.