Revolution Idle
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 52 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 18 | 24 | 27 | 37 |
| 1440p QHD | 30 | 50 | 54 | 67 |
| 1080p Full HD | 48 | 78 | 84 | 109 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Revolution Idle with Intel Core i5-14400F + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
# Revolution Idle with Intel Core i5-14400F + Intel Arc B580
The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a playable but constrained experience in Revolution Idle, ranking 1366th out of 1774 tested combos. This places the combination in the lower 23% of all tested configurations, indicating that while the hardware is capable in general-purpose benchmarks — the CPU sits in the 88th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile — the game's specific demands expose significant performance limitations. At 1080p, the combo manages a respectable 77.5 FPS on High settings, but the experience degrades sharply at higher resolutions, with 4K Ultra dropping to just 17.6 FPS. The data suggests that Revolution Idle is heavily resolution-bound on this hardware, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint as pixel count increases.
FAQ
Q: What is the combo's overall ranking in Revolution Idle?
A: The Intel Core i5-14400F + Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 1366th out of 1774 tested combos in Revolution Idle, placing it in the lower percentile of all tested configurations.
Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32508, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-12800H (32513, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446, 0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (32584, 0.2% behind). The Intel Core i7-13705H also sits nearby at 32586, just 0.2% higher.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 puts it within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (23181), 0.1% of the AMD Radeon 760M (22999), and 0.3% of the NVIDIA P106-100 (22950). The RTX 4060 Mobile trails by 1.3% with a score of 22729.
Q: What is the best FPS the combo achieves in Revolution Idle?
A: The highest measured average FPS is 108.8, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only setting and resolution combination that breaks the 100 FPS mark.
Q: Does the GPU have enough VRAM for this game?
A: The Intel Arc B580 comes with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Given the game's measured FPS patterns, VRAM appears sufficient even at 4K, as the bottleneck is more clearly tied to rendering resolution rather than memory capacity.
Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?
A: The Intel Core i5-14400F features 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It includes 20 MB of shared L3 cache and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.
How This Combo Ranks
The 1366th rank out of 1774 combos signals that this pairing underperforms relative to its component-level benchmark standings. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking across all processors suggests strong general compute capabilities, while the GPU's 66th percentile indicates mid-tier graphics performance. In Revolution Idle specifically, the combination lands in the bottom quarter of tested setups, indicating that the game's rendering workload does not align well with this hardware's strengths.
The gap between the component benchmarks and the in-game ranking is telling. The CPU's nearest rivals — the Intel Core i7-12800H and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 — score within 0.2% of the i5-14400F in average benchmarks, yet the in-game rank reflects a broader system performance context. Meanwhile, the GPU's closest competitors, including the RTX 4060 with a mere 0.7% score difference, suggest that any of these cards would likely produce similar frame rates in this title.
The 1366th position out of 1774 represents the 23rd percentile of tested combos. This places the system below the median but not at the absolute bottom, indicating that while the hardware can run the game, it does so with notable compromises. The data shows that the combo's ranking is dragged down primarily by the GPU's performance ceiling at higher resolutions rather than any CPU limitation.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy across settings presets at each resolution. At 1920x1080, Low settings deliver 108.8 FPS, Medium drops to 84 FPS, High manages 77.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 48 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra represents a 38% performance penalty, making Ultra the least efficient choice at this resolution.
For 2560x1440, the pattern shifts: Low yields 66.7 FPS, High provides 50.1 FPS, Medium sits at 53.5 FPS, and Ultra produces 30.4 FPS. Interestingly, High outperforms Medium at this resolution, suggesting that the Medium preset may apply settings that are disproportionately expensive relative to their visual benefit. The data supports High as the optimal preset here, as it maintains playable frame rates while presumably offering better visual quality than Low.
At 3840x2160, all presets struggle: Low achieves 37 FPS, Medium 26.7 FPS, High 24.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 17.6 FPS. Only Low approaches a playable threshold, and even that falls short of smooth 60 FPS gameplay. The recommendation is clear: players targeting 4K should use Low settings, while 1440p users should opt for High, and 1080p users can reasonably choose between Medium and High depending on their preference for visual fidelity versus frame rate headroom.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce 108.8 FPS, which represents the only triple-digit average across all tested configurations. Medium achieves 84 FPS, High reaches 77.5 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 48 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 60.8 FPS, indicating that settings have a substantial impact on performance at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the FPS drops noticeably. Low yields 66.7 FPS, a 38.7% reduction from the 1080p Low result. Medium produces 53.5 FPS, High delivers 50.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 30.4 FPS. The non-monotonic relationship between Medium (53.5) and High (50.1) is noteworthy — the gap is just 3.4 FPS, suggesting that the High preset may include optimizations that partially offset its increased visual demands.
At 3840x2160, performance becomes marginal across the board. Low manages 37 FPS, Medium drops to 26.7 FPS, High achieves 24.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 17.6 FPS. The difference between Medium and High at 4K is only 2.4 FPS, while the jump from Low to Medium costs 10.3 FPS. These numbers indicate that 4K gaming on this combo is only viable with the lowest settings, and even then, frame rates remain below the 60 FPS threshold commonly associated with smooth gameplay.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580's specifications paint a picture of a mid-range graphics card that struggles with Revolution Idle's higher resolutions. The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines, with a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at 2375 MHz with a 192-bit bus, yielding 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that should handle most texture streaming demands.
The GPU's benchmark scores are modest: PassMark G3D scores 15748, while 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 reaches 3068. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 and OpenCL score of 92821 indicate reasonable compute capabilities. However, the PassMark DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 12 score of 76 suggest that the card's gaming performance may not scale linearly with its compute power.
In Revolution Idle, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution rises. At 1080p, the card can push 108.8 FPS on Low, but this drops to 37 FPS at 4K Low — a 66% reduction. The pattern strongly suggests that the GPU's pixel throughput, rated at 213.6 GPixel/s, becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for lower resolutions but insufficient to maintain frame rates at 4K.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14400F provides substantial compute headroom that the game does not fully exploit. With 10 cores and 16 threads, the CPU offers strong multi-threaded performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21914 and single-core score of 3093. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25783 and single-thread score of 3723 further confirm its capability.
The CPU's nearest rivals all score within 0.2% of its average benchmark of 32508, indicating that this processor performs consistently with other mid-range options. Its 20 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 provide adequate bandwidth for most gaming workloads. The 65 W TDP suggests efficient operation, though the game's performance patterns indicate the CPU is rarely the bottleneck.
Given that the FPS drops from 108.8 at 1080p Low to 37 at 4K Low — a 71.6 FPS reduction — the data clearly shows the CPU is not the limiting component. Even at 4K Ultra with 17.6 FPS, the CPU's 16 threads and 4.70 GHz boost clock are likely idle much of the time. The game's idle genre means it likely does not stress the CPU heavily, making the GPU the primary determinant of performance.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a steep performance cliff. At Low settings, the combo delivers 108.8 FPS at 1080p, 66.7 FPS at 1440p (a 38.7% drop), and 37 FPS at 4K (a 66% drop from 1080p). This scaling pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound workload, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K.
For High settings, the progression is 77.5 FPS at 1080p, 50.1 FPS at 1440p (35.4% drop), and 24.3 FPS at 4K (68.6% drop). The percentage drops are similar across settings, confirming that resolution scaling affects all presets roughly equally. The data indicates that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become increasingly strained as resolution increases.
The limiting component is clearly the GPU. The Arc B580's 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are adequate for 1080p and even 1440p at lower settings, but they fall short at 4K. The CPU's performance remains constant regardless of resolution, so the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K directly reflects the GPU's inability to maintain throughput as pixel count rises. Players seeking 4K gameplay would need a significantly more powerful GPU, while those content with 1080p or 1440p can achieve playable frame rates with this combo.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14400F
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14400F + Intel Arc B580 in Revolution Idle
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 37.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 26.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 24.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 17.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 66.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 53.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 50.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 30.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 108.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 84.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 77.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 48.0 |
Revolution Idle with ii5-14400F + Other GPUs
See how Revolution Idle performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Revolution Idle with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Revolution Idle performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14400F + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.