Pc Building Simulator

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a playable experience in Pc Building Simulator, but the data reveals a system that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher resolutions. With a combo rank of 2243 out of 3002 tested configurations, this pairing sits in the lower third of the database, indicating that while the CPU is a strong performer, the GPU holds the system back from achieving top-tier frame rates in this simulation title.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a dramatic and consistent drop in performance as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces an average of 217 FPS, but this falls to 137 FPS at 1440p and then plummets to 72 FPS at 4K. This represents a 66.8% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, a steep curve that points directly at the Intel Arc B580 as the limiting factor.

The scaling pattern becomes even more telling when examining the High settings preset. The average frame rate drops from 109 FPS at 1080p to 69 FPS at 1440p, a loss of 36.7%, and then further down to 36 FPS at 4K, which is a 67% reduction from the 1080p figure. The fact that the frame rate nearly halves when moving from 1440p to 4K at High settings indicates that the GPU is running out of pixel throughput, as the Arc B580’s 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate becomes the bottleneck.

What is particularly striking is the relationship between resolution and settings. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra settings is substantial, with a 114 FPS difference (217 FPS versus 103 FPS). However, at 4K, this gap narrows to just 38 FPS (72 FPS versus 34 FPS). This compression of performance at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU is so saturated at 4K that even dropping from Ultra to Low cannot fully compensate for the increased pixel count, whereas at 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom to allow settings to have a much larger impact.

The data implies that for this specific combination, 1080p is the resolution where the system can fully stretch its legs, while 1440p remains viable for most settings, but 4K is only playable at Low settings. The 4K Medium result of 51 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS shows that even the middle ground struggles to maintain smooth gameplay, and the Ultra preset at 4K drops to an average of 34 FPS, which is below the threshold for comfortable play.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580’s specifications provide context for its performance ceiling in this game. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, the card offers 456.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is a generous amount for a simulation title that may not be particularly memory-hungry. However, the core configuration of 2560 shading units and 80 ROPs appears to be the limiting factor, as the card’s 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is moderate by current standards.

The GPU’s boost clock is listed at 2670 MHz, and this relatively high clock speed helps it maintain competitive performance at lower resolutions, but the raw pixel and texture throughput becomes the wall at higher resolutions. The 427.2 GTexel/s texture rate and 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are the figures that dictate how quickly the card can fill frames, and the measured FPS drops align closely with what these specifications would suggest for a 4K workload.

The benchmark results for the Arc B580 place it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a delta of 0.6% and the RTX 3080 at -0.7%, indicating that the B580 performs in a similar tier to these older high-end cards. This positioning explains why the GPU struggles at 4K in Pc Building Simulator, as it is not designed to handle the pixel count of 3840x2160 with high visual fidelity.

The GPU’s memory configuration of 12 GB is notable because it exceeds what many competing cards offer, and this could be a factor in the game’s performance at higher resolutions where texture data is more demanding. However, the fact that the average FPS at 4K Ultra is just 34 FPS suggests that memory capacity is not the primary bottleneck; rather, it is the shader and ROP throughput that limits the card’s ability to process the increased geometry and pixel work at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

With a combo rank of 2243 out of 3002 tested combinations, this pairing of the Ryzen 5 7400F and Arc B580 places in the 74.7th percentile of all combos, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the tested systems but falls behind the top quarter. This ranking is somewhat surprising given the CPU’s strong benchmark scores, but it underscores the importance of GPU performance in this game, which appears to be the dominant factor in overall system ranking.

The rank suggests that while the CPU is a capable partner, the GPU is holding the combo back from reaching higher tiers. The fact that the combo sits at 2243, rather than higher, implies that many other tested systems with more powerful GPUs achieve significantly better frame rates, even if their CPUs are weaker. This is consistent with the resolution scaling data, which shows the GPU as the clear bottleneck in most scenarios.

What is particularly interesting is that the CPU’s percentile ranking is 83rd among all CPUs, while the GPU’s is only 68th. This 15-point gap between the two components’ relative performance levels suggests a mismatch in this pairing, where the CPU is capable of feeding a more powerful GPU but is limited by the Arc B580’s performance ceiling. The data indicates that if this CPU were paired with a higher-tier GPU, the combo rank would likely improve substantially.

The ranking also reflects the game’s nature as a simulation title, which may not be heavily optimized for GPU performance. Pc Building Simulator’s 2019 release date and simulation genre mean it likely does not stress modern hardware as much as newer AAA titles, yet the GPU still becomes the limiting factor at 4K, which speaks to the sheer pixel count demands of that resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of how this system performs across all resolution and settings combinations. At 1920x1080, the system delivers excellent performance across the board, with Low settings achieving an average of 217 FPS, Medium at 154 FPS with a minimum of 131 and maximum of 177, High at 109 FPS, and Ultra at 103 FPS. These results show that at 1080p, the system has ample headroom for high refresh rate monitors, with even Ultra settings comfortably exceeding 100 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU’s limits. Low settings produce an average of 137 FPS, which is still very playable, while Medium drops to 97 FPS with a range of 83 to 112. High settings achieve 69 FPS, and Ultra falls to 65 FPS. The 1440p results indicate that this resolution is a sweet spot for the system, as it offers a good balance between visual quality and frame rate, with High and Ultra settings both remaining above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher settings. Low settings achieve 72 FPS, which is the only 4K preset that exceeds 60 FPS. Medium drops to 51 FPS with a minimum of 43, High falls to 36 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 34 FPS. The 4K results clearly show that this GPU is not suited for 4K gaming at high settings, as even Medium settings dip below the 60 FPS mark, and the minimum FPS of 43 at Medium indicates noticeable stuttering.

The progression from Low to Ultra at each resolution follows a predictable pattern, but the magnitude of the performance hit from settings increases becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 114 FPS, while at 1440p it is 72 FPS, and at 4K it is 38 FPS. This diminishing impact of settings at higher resolutions reinforces the conclusion that the GPU is the primary constraint, as it has less headroom to absorb the additional workload from higher quality presets.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this system in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 provides the most consistent performance, with all settings presets achieving over 100 FPS on average. Even Ultra settings at 1080p reach 103 FPS, making this the optimal resolution for a smooth experience.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system achieves an average of 34 FPS, which is below the generally accepted threshold for smooth gameplay. This preset is not recommended for playable frame rates.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, as frame rates drop significantly with increasing resolution while the CPU remains relatively strong. The Arc B580’s 68th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 83rd percentile supports this conclusion.

Q: What is the difference in performance between Medium and High settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings produce an average of 97 FPS, while High settings produce 69 FPS. This represents a 28 FPS difference, showing that the step from Medium to High has a substantial impact on performance.

Q: Does the system ever drop below 60 FPS at 1080p?

A: No, at 1920x1080, all settings presets achieve an average above 100 FPS. Even the lowest average, which is 103 FPS at Ultra settings, remains well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23061 (-0.2%), and slightly higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (0.6%). It is slightly lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 23172 (-0.7%).

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. This CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 32750. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T with a 0.1% delta and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at -0.2%, indicating the 7400F is a competitive mid-range processor.

In the context of Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role appears to be secondary to the GPU, as the resolution scaling data shows that frame rates are heavily dependent on pixel count rather than CPU workload. However, the CPU’s strong single-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, ensures that the game’s simulation logic and physics calculations are handled efficiently, preventing CPU bottlenecks at lower resolutions.

The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for feeding the GPU with data. The fact that the 1080p Low setting achieves 217 FPS suggests that the CPU is not limiting frame rates even at very high FPS levels, as a weaker processor would likely cause the frame rate to plateau or drop at these high values.

The 65W TDP of the 7400F indicates it is an efficient processor that does not generate excessive heat, which is beneficial for maintaining consistent performance over extended gaming sessions. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes ensures that the GPU has a high-bandwidth connection, although the Arc B580 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is still sufficient for the GPU’s data transfer needs.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends heavily on the target resolution. For 1080p users, the Ultra preset at 103 FPS is the clear choice, as it provides the highest visual quality while still maintaining a frame rate that exceeds 100 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 1080p is only 6 FPS (109 versus 103), making the Ultra preset a worthwhile upgrade for those with capable displays.

For 1440p, the Medium preset at 97 FPS offers the best balance of performance and visual quality, as it remains well above 60 FPS while providing a reasonable level of detail. The High preset at 69 FPS is also viable for players who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate, but the drop from 97 to 69 FPS is significant and may be noticeable on high refresh rate monitors. The Ultra preset at 65 FPS is marginally lower than High and offers minimal visual gains, making it a less attractive option.

At 4K, the Low preset at 72 FPS is the only playable option, as it is the sole preset that exceeds 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 51 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS may be acceptable for slower-paced simulation gameplay, but the frequent frame drops could be distracting. High and Ultra at 36 and 34 FPS respectively are not recommended, as they fall below the threshold for smooth motion and would likely result in a poor experience.

For the best overall experience, the data suggests using 1080p with Ultra settings, as this combination delivers the highest visual quality while maintaining a frame rate of 103 FPS. If a higher resolution is desired, 1440p with Medium settings provides a solid compromise at 97 FPS. For 4K users, the Low preset at 72 FPS is the only reasonable choice, but the lower visual fidelity may detract from the simulation experience.