Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 136 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 51 | 72 | 102 |
| 1440p QHD | 93 | 98 | 138 | 195 |
| 1080p Full HD | 147 | 155 | 219 | 309 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT delivers a thoroughly capable experience in Pc Building Simulator, with the data showing a clear sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors. This combination ranks in the 1073rd position out of 3002 tested combos, placing it comfortably in the upper third of the database. The measured frame rates reveal that while the system can push very high numbers at lower settings, the most balanced experience comes from the Medium preset, which offers the only complete dataset with minimum and maximum FPS values across all three resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark results indicate that the Medium preset provides the most consistent and predictable experience for this hardware combination. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 219 FPS average with a minimum of 186 FPS and a maximum of 252 FPS, which represents a substantial performance buffer above typical 144Hz display refresh rates. The minimum FPS of 186 ensures that even during demanding simulation scenes, the frame rate rarely dips below the point where stutter becomes noticeable. This makes Medium the recommended preset for users prioritizing smoothness without sacrificing too much visual fidelity.
For 2560x1440, the Medium preset continues to impress with an average of 138 FPS, a minimum of 118 FPS, and a maximum of 159 FPS. This keeps the experience above the 100 FPS threshold for most of the time, making it viable for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming. The High preset at 1440p drops to 98 FPS average, which is still respectable but lacks the minimum FPS data to confirm stability. At 3840x2160, Medium produces 72 FPS average with a tight range of 61 to 83 FPS, which provides a playable 4K experience, though users with 120Hz or higher 4K displays would need to consider the Low preset for higher frame rates.
The Low preset offers the highest performance ceiling, reaching 309 FPS at 1080p, 195 FPS at 1440p, and 102 FPS at 4K. However, the lack of minimum FPS data for Low settings means stability cannot be verified from the measurements. The Ultra preset, while visually superior, drops the 1080p average to 147 FPS and the 4K average to 49 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold at 4K. The data strongly suggests that Medium is the optimal balance, as it is the only preset where both average and minimum performance are documented, showing consistent frame delivery without extreme variance.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz provide the computational foundation for the simulation's logic and physics calculations. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core, ensures that game state data and entity management operations have fast access to frequently used information.
In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are significant. The processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072, indicating strong parallel performance for the game's simulation systems. The PassMark multi-thread score of 25645 and physics score of 1660 further corroborate the CPU's ability to handle concurrent workloads. The Ryzen 5 7400F's percentile ranking of 83 against all CPUs places it well above average, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i5-14600T at 0.1% higher average score and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 0.2% lower, showing competitive parity in general processing tasks.
The 65W TDP of the Ryzen 5 7400F suggests efficient power usage, which is beneficial for sustained simulation workloads that keep all cores active. With DDR5 memory support and dual-channel architecture providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, the CPU has sufficient data throughput to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The L3 cache size of 32 MB is particularly relevant for simulation games that often have large working sets of active objects, as it reduces the frequency of slower main memory accesses.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the primary graphics driver for this combination, featuring the Navi 32 chip on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 5 nm TSMC process. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz, providing substantial rendering throughput for the simulation's visual elements. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than adequate for the texture and geometry data typical of a building simulation game.
The GPU's compute capabilities are highlighted by its FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s. With 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, the RX 7700 XT is well-equipped to handle the rendering of detailed PC components and workshop environments. The 54 ray tracing cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), providing optional ray-traced effects, though the benchmark data does not specifically measure these features in this game.
The RX 7700 XT's percentile ranking of 67 against all GPUs places it in the upper two-thirds of the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile at 0.5% higher average score and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile at 0.8% lower, indicating that the RX 7700 XT sits in a competitive mid-to-high range. The 245W TDP and dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin power connectors suggest this is a full-sized desktop GPU that can sustain high clock speeds during extended gaming sessions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT achieves a rank of 1073 out of 3002 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator. This places the pairing in the 64th percentile of all combos, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the systems in the database. Given the game's nature as a simulation title that can be sensitive to both CPU and GPU performance, this ranking reflects a solidly balanced configuration.
The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by its 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, complements the GPU's 67th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This balance is important for a simulation game where frame delivery depends on both the CPU managing game logic and the GPU rendering the scene. The near-parity in performance percentiles suggests that neither component is severely bottlenecking the other at typical gaming resolutions.
The nearest rival comparisons for the CPU show extremely small deltas of 0.1% to 0.3% against similarly performing processors, indicating that the Ryzen 5 7400F is at the center of a tight performance cluster. For the GPU, the RX 7700 XT's closest rivals include the RTX 5060 Mobile at 0.5% higher and the RX 5700 at 1.7% lower, demonstrating that the GPU's position is also well-established within its performance tier. The overall combo rank of 1073 out of 3002 reflects the combined capability of these two components working together in this specific game.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combination in Pc Building Simulator?
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 at Medium settings delivers 219 FPS average, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. For 2560x1440, Medium still provides 138 FPS average, making it a strong choice for users with 1440p displays. The 3840x2160 Medium preset offers 72 FPS average, which is playable but not ideal for competitive or high-refresh-rate scenarios.
Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High settings in terms of measured performance?
A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 147 FPS average compared to 155 FPS on High, a difference of 8 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra delivers 93 FPS versus 98 FPS on High, a 5 FPS difference. At 3840x2160, Ultra produces 49 FPS compared to 51 FPS on High, showing that the performance gap between these presets narrows as resolution increases.
Q: What is the most stable preset according to the measured data?
A: The Medium preset is the only one with documented minimum and maximum FPS values across all three resolutions. At 1080p, the range is 186 to 252 FPS; at 1440p, it is 118 to 159 FPS; and at 4K, it is 61 to 83 FPS. This data allows for verification of consistency, making Medium the most reliably characterized preset in the measurements.
Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming in Pc Building Simulator?
A: Yes, but with caveats. The Medium preset at 3840x2160 achieves 72 FPS average with a minimum of 61 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Low preset reaches 102 FPS at 4K, while the High and Ultra presets fall to 51 and 49 FPS respectively, indicating that 4K gaming requires either Medium or Low settings for comfortable frame rates.
Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance affect gameplay?
A: The Ryzen 5 7400F achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, which is strong for simulation games that often have a primary thread handling game logic. The PassMark single-thread score of 3689 corroborates this, ensuring that the CPU can maintain high frame rates even when GPU load is relatively low, such as at 1080p resolutions.
Q: What GPU memory configuration does this system use?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for the texture and asset requirements of a building simulation game, even at 4K resolutions where the Medium preset maintains playable frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates provide a comprehensive view of how this combination performs across different settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 309 FPS average, which is the highest measured value in the entire dataset. The Medium preset at 1080p yields 219 FPS average with a minimum of 186 FPS and maximum of 252 FPS, while the High preset achieves 155 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 1080p produces 147 FPS average.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset reaches 195 FPS average, representing a significant drop from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 138 FPS with a range of 118 to 159 FPS, while the High preset achieves 98 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 1440p delivers 93 FPS average, which is only 5 FPS lower than the High preset at the same resolution.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset produces 102 FPS average, which is the only 4K setting that exceeds the 100 FPS mark. The Medium preset at 4K averages 72 FPS with a minimum of 61 FPS and maximum of 83 FPS, providing a playable experience. The High preset at 4K achieves 51 FPS average, and the Ultra preset falls to 49 FPS average, both below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
The data reveals that the Medium preset offers the most complete dataset with minimum and maximum FPS values at every resolution, allowing for the most thorough analysis of performance consistency. The High and Ultra presets lack this granular data, making it difficult to assess their stability, though their average FPS values suggest they are viable at 1080p and 1440p but not at 4K.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals how the system scales across resolutions and which component becomes the limiting factor. At the Medium preset, the 1080p average of 219 FPS drops to 138 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 37%, and further to 72 FPS at 4K, an additional reduction of 48% from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, since the total pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K while the frame rate does not decrease proportionally.
The Low preset demonstrates a similar trend, with 309 FPS at 1080p dropping to 195 FPS at 1440p and 102 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 37% from 1080p to 1440p and 48% from 1440p to 4K, matching the Medium preset's scaling closely. This consistency suggests that the CPU is not introducing additional bottlenecks at higher resolutions, as the scaling patterns are nearly identical across presets.
For the High preset, the 1080p average of 155 FPS drops to 98 FPS at 1440p, a 37% reduction, and then to 51 FPS at 4K, a 48% reduction from 1440p. The Ultra preset follows the same pattern: 147 FPS at 1080p, 93 FPS at 1440p (37% lower), and 49 FPS at 4K (47% lower from 1440p). This uniform scaling behavior across all presets strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component for this combination in Pc Building Simulator.
The fact that the frame rate drops by roughly 37% when going from 1080p to 1440p, and then by roughly 48% when going from 1440p to 4K, aligns with the pixel count increases of 1.78x and 2.25x respectively. This near-linear relationship between pixel count and frame rate confirms that the RX 7700 XT is being fully utilized at all resolutions, while the Ryzen 5 7400F provides sufficient CPU performance to avoid becoming a limiting factor even at the highest frame rates measured.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7400F
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 102.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 195.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 138.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 98.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 93.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 309.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 219.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 155.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 147.0 |
Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 5 7400F + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7400F + RX 7700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.