Minimum

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a highly playable experience in Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter released on 2014-06-25. The benchmark data, derived from measured results, shows that this combination of a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 3 processor and an Ampere-based graphics card is well-balanced for this title, though performance scaling across resolutions reveals where each component’s workload begins to shift.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 with this hardware configuration provides a clear picture of how frame rates respond to pixel count increases. At the High preset, the average frame rate drops from 171 FPS at 1920x1080 to 110 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 60 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 65% reduction in average FPS when moving from the lowest tested resolution to the highest, which is a substantial but expected decline given the 4x pixel count difference between 1080p and 4K.

The scaling pattern suggests that at 1920x1080, the system is not entirely GPU-bound. With a 171 FPS average on High settings, the frame rate is high enough that the CPU’s single-thread performance, measured at a PassMark single-thread score of 2872, becomes a more significant factor. As resolution increases to 2560x1440 and then to 3840x2160, the GPU’s workload grows, and the RTX 3080’s 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth become the primary limiting factor. The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens at higher resolutions, which is characteristic of a GPU that is increasingly saturated.

Looking at the Low preset, the system achieves 267 FPS at 1080p, 172 FPS at 1440p, and 93 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is a 35.6% reduction, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is a 45.9% reduction. This non-linear scaling indicates that at 4K Low, the GPU is still managing the workload comfortably, but the frame rate is beginning to approach levels where the CPU’s 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.00 GHz boost clock could start to matter if settings were lowered further. The data shows that the RTX 3080’s 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores are not heavily taxed by this older title, but the raw shading power of 8704 units is what drives the high frame rates.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, built on the GA102 chip with an 8 nm process from Samsung, is the dominant component in this pairing for Minimum. Its specifications include a base clock of 1440 MHz and a boost clock of 1710 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz effective 19 Gbps. The 10 GB GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus delivers a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, which is more than sufficient for a game released in 2014. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25086 places it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 23172 is closely matched by rivals like the NVIDIA P106-100 (deltaPct -0.3) and AMD Radeon RX 6600M (deltaPct -0.4).

In Minimum, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 131, which is 76% higher than the 4K Ultra result of 45 FPS. This large gap between the lowest and highest resolutions at Ultra settings indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, as the pixel fill rate requirement outpaces what the RTX 3080 can deliver for this title. The measured Medium preset at 4K shows an average of 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 and maximum of 82, which is a tighter band than the High preset’s single 60 FPS average, suggesting that the Medium settings reduce the GPU’s workload enough to stabilize frame times.

The RTX 3080’s memory configuration plays a notable role at 4K. With 10 GB of GDDR6X, the card has enough capacity for this game’s textures, but the bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s is what allows the 93 FPS average at 4K Low. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s are far above what Minimum requires, yet the 4K Ultra result of 45 FPS suggests that the game’s engine has inefficiencies that even this powerful GPU cannot overcome at maximum settings.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 achieves a combo rank of 776 out of 2939 tested combinations for Minimum. This places it in the top 26.4% of all combos tested for this game, which is a strong showing given the CPU’s relatively recent release date of 2025-09-15 compared to the GPU’s 2020-08-31 launch. The combo’s performance is consistent with its component scores: the CPU’s average benchmark score of 36945 puts it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU’s average score of 23172 places it in the 68th percentile.

The rank of 776 suggests that while this combo is capable, there are 775 other combinations that deliver higher frame rates in Minimum. This is likely due to the fact that the RTX 3080, while powerful, is not the top-tier GPU in the database for this game, and the Ryzen 5 5600F’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient but not overkill. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (avgScore 36938, deltaPct 0) and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (avgScore 37018, deltaPct -0.2), which perform nearly identically in synthetic tests. This indicates that the combo’s rank is more influenced by the GPU’s performance tier than the CPU’s, as the RTX 3080’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores are significantly less powerful cards like the AMD Radeon R9 M290X (avgScore 23276, deltaPct -0.4).

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo in Minimum are as follows. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 267 FPS, Medium delivers 204 FPS with a range of 174 to 235, High delivers 171 FPS, and Ultra delivers 131 FPS. These numbers show a clear scaling pattern where each step up in settings costs roughly 20-25% of the frame rate. The 1080p results indicate that the CPU is keeping up with the GPU’s output, as even the Ultra preset’s 131 FPS is well above the 60 Hz threshold for most displays.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop to 172 FPS on Low, 132 FPS on Medium (with a range of 112 to 151), 110 FPS on High, and 84 FPS on Ultra. The relative performance between settings is similar to 1080p, but the absolute values are lower, confirming that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor. The 1440p High result of 110 FPS is still excellent for a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 3840x2160, the results are 93 FPS on Low, 71 FPS on Medium (with a range of 60 to 82), 60 FPS on High, and 45 FPS on Ultra. The 4K High result of exactly 60 FPS is notable as it aligns with standard 60 Hz display refresh rates, making it a viable option for a locked 60 FPS experience. The 4K Ultra result of 45 FPS is below the 60 FPS target and would require a display with adaptive sync to feel smooth. The 4K Low result of 93 FPS shows that the GPU has headroom when settings are reduced, but the gap between Low and Ultra at 4K (93 vs 45 FPS) is a 51.6% difference, highlighting the significant impact of the Ultra preset’s additional graphical features.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings is 171 FPS.

Q: How does the combo perform at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 45 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay on standard displays.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 172 FPS average, while the Ultra preset delivers 84 FPS average, a difference of 88 FPS.

Q: Does the combo maintain a minimum of 60 FPS at any 4K setting?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS is exactly 60, with an average of 71 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS.

*Q: What rank does this combo achieve among all tested combinations for Minimum?*

A: This combo achieves a rank of 776 out of 2939 tested combinations, placing it in the top 26.4% of all combos.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it relate to 4K performance?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, which supports the 93 FPS average at 4K Low settings, but the 4K Ultra result of 45 FPS indicates that bandwidth alone cannot overcome the Ultra preset’s demands.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080, the High preset at 171 FPS is the best balance, as it provides a frame rate well above 144 Hz refresh rates while maintaining visual quality. The Ultra preset at 131 FPS is also viable for 144 Hz displays, but the 40 FPS difference between High and Ultra may not justify the visual upgrade for all users. The Low preset at 267 FPS is unnecessary unless the user has a 240 Hz monitor and prioritizes frame rate above all else.

For 2560x1440, the High preset at 110 FPS is the recommended choice, as it sits comfortably above 100 FPS for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset at 132 FPS is also excellent if the user prefers higher frame rates, but the visual fidelity difference is minimal. The Ultra preset at 84 FPS is acceptable for 60 Hz displays but may feel less responsive on faster panels.

For 3840x2160, the High preset at exactly 60 FPS average is the best option for a locked 60 FPS experience, provided the user can tolerate occasional drops. The Medium preset at 71 FPS average with a 60 FPS minimum offers a small buffer against frame drops, making it the safer choice for maintaining consistent performance. The Ultra preset at 45 FPS is not recommended for standard 60 Hz displays, as it falls below the refresh rate and will introduce visible stutter. The Low preset at 93 FPS is only advisable if the user prioritizes frame rate over all visual effects, but the High preset provides a better visual experience at a still-playable 60 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer), plays a supporting role in Minimum but is not the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 2872 and multithread score of 19236 indicate solid performance, and its 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps with game data access. The 65 W TDP and 7 nm process node from TSMC make it an efficient processor, though the game’s release in 2014 means it was designed for much older hardware.

The CPU’s role becomes more evident at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high. At 1920x1080 Low, the 267 FPS average suggests that the GPU is capable of producing more frames than the CPU can consistently feed, but the CPU’s 3.00 GHz base and 4.00 GHz boost clocks are sufficient to maintain these rates. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (avgScore 36938, deltaPct 0) and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (avgScore 37018, deltaPct -0.2), perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks, indicating that this is a mainstream-level processor that does not hold back the RTX 3080 in most scenarios.

At 4K resolutions, the CPU’s workload decreases relative to the GPU, as the frame rate drops to 60 FPS on High and 45 FPS on Ultra. In these scenarios, the CPU is likely idle much of the time, waiting for the GPU to complete its rendering tasks. The data shows that the combo’s rank of 776 out of 2939 is more heavily influenced by the GPU’s performance tier, as the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking across all CPUs is higher than the GPU’s 68th percentile. This suggests that upgrading the CPU would yield minimal gains in Minimum, while the GPU is the component that determines the ceiling for frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and settings.