Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
124
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 124 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 46 57 67 90
1440p QHD 82 107 128 166
1080p Full HD 128 166 199 258

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 90
3840x2160 Medium 67
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Ultra 46
2560x1440 Low 166
2560x1440 Medium 128
2560x1440 High 107
2560x1440 Ultra 82
1920x1080 Low 258
1920x1080 Medium 199
1920x1080 High 166
1920x1080 Ultra 128

Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT pairing delivers a performance profile in Minimum that is heavily dictated by resolution and preset, with the data showing a clear transition from CPU-bound behavior at 1080p to a GPU-limited experience at 4K. The measured frame rates across twelve configurations reveal a component duo that excels at high refresh rates on standard monitors but falls short of a locked 60 FPS experience at maximum settings on 4K displays.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is stark and demonstrates the shifting bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 257.5 FPS, which is an exceptional figure that suggests the CPU is doing the heavy lifting while the GPU remains largely underutilized. Moving to 1440p at the same Low preset, the average drops to 165.8 FPS, a decline of approximately 36% that indicates the GPU is beginning to take on more responsibility. By 4K Low, the average falls to 89.7 FPS, which is still highly playable but represents a 65% reduction from the 1080p result.

This scaling pattern becomes even more pronounced at higher presets. At High settings, the transition from 1080p (165.7 FPS) to 1440p (107.4 FPS) shows a 35% performance hit, while the jump to 4K (57.4 FPS) introduces another 47% drop. The Ultra preset tells the most revealing story: 1080p delivers 127.9 FPS, 1440p drops to 82.3 FPS, and 4K plummets to 45.7 FPS. The steep decline at 4K Ultra, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold, signals that the RX 6800 XT’s rendering capabilities are the primary constraint at this resolution, regardless of the CPU’s headroom.

The data suggests that the sweet spot for this pairing is 1440p, where even the Ultra preset maintains an average above 80 FPS. At 1080p, the frame rates are so high that the monitor’s refresh rate becomes the limiting factor rather than the hardware. The 4K results, particularly at Medium (67.1 FPS) and High (57.4 FPS), indicate that users targeting 4K will need to make significant sacrifices in visual fidelity to achieve smooth gameplay, as the gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is a substantial 44 FPS.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 5600’s specifications play a crucial role in the lower-resolution results. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, this processor provides a solid foundation for Minimum’s threading demands. The base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz are reflected in the benchmark scores, particularly the 3dmark single-thread result of 882, which correlates with the high frame rates observed at 1080p. The processor’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain consistent performance in scenarios where the game engine accesses frequently used data.

The CPU’s influence is most evident at 1080p Low, where the 257.5 FPS average is a direct result of the processor’s ability to feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 5641 and the max-threads score of 5659 indicate that the processor has sufficient multi-threaded capacity to avoid becoming a bottleneck even in demanding scenes. The Cinebench R23 multicore result of 18309 further supports this, showing that the CPU can handle sustained loads without throttling.

However, the CPU’s role diminishes as resolution increases. At 4K, the frame rates across all presets are consistently lower, and the differences between presets become more pronounced—a classic sign of GPU limitation. The benchmark results place this CPU in the 79th percentile among all processors, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-1746TER with a 0.6% higher average score and the AMD EPYC 9554P with a 0.6% lower score. This competitive positioning means that in CPU-bound scenarios, users are unlikely to see significant performance differences compared to other high-end processors, but the 5600’s strength is its ability to maintain high minimum frame rates, which is critical for a fast-paced third-person shooter.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is the dominant component in this pairing, particularly at higher resolutions where its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth become essential. The GPU’s 4608 shading units and 128 ROPs are reflected in the passmark G3D score of 24980, which places it in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The boost clock of 2250 MHz and game clock of 2015 MHz allow the card to sustain high performance, as evidenced by the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3689.

The GPU’s VRAM capacity is a critical asset at 4K, where texture-heavy scenes in Minimum can quickly consume memory. The 16 GB allocation ensures that even at Ultra settings, the card does not run into memory limitations, which would otherwise cause stuttering or texture pop-in. The memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and the 256-bit bus width provide the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth necessary to feed the 288 TMUs and maintain the pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s.

The GPU’s closest rivals in the benchmark database include the Intel Arc A550M with a 0.5% higher average score and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER with a 2.6% lower score. This positioning shows that the RX 6800 XT is a high-end performer, but its age—released in late 2020 and now end-of-life—means it is not at the very top of the current hierarchy. The data indicates that at 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor, as the frame rates at High (57.4 FPS) and Ultra (45.7 FPS) are below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At 1080p, however, the GPU is clearly not the bottleneck, as the 257.5 FPS Low result and even the 127.9 FPS Ultra result demonstrate that the card has ample headroom to push beyond standard refresh rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. For 1080p users, the Ultra preset at 127.9 FPS provides an excellent experience that exceeds the refresh rate of most standard monitors, making this the recommended choice for those prioritizing visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 165.7 FPS is also viable for users with high-refresh displays, but the incremental visual gains from Ultra are worth the 38 FPS cost given the still-impressive frame rate.

At 1440p, the High preset at 107.4 FPS strikes the best balance between fidelity and performance. The Ultra preset at 82.3 FPS remains playable and is a solid option for those who value image quality over absolute frame rates, but the Medium preset at 127.8 FPS offers a significant performance boost with only a modest reduction in visual quality. The Low preset at 165.8 FPS is unnecessary for most users at this resolution, as it sacrifices too much detail for frame rates that exceed what most 1440p monitors can display.

For 4K, the recommendations become more conservative. The Low preset at 89.7 FPS is the only option that consistently exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, making it the safest choice for competitive play. The Medium preset at 67.1 FPS is acceptable for those who want better visuals and can tolerate occasional dips below 60 FPS, but the High preset at 57.4 FPS and Ultra preset at 45.7 FPS are best avoided unless the user is willing to accept a sub-optimal experience. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo requires a trade-off: choose Low for smoothness or Medium for a visual compromise, but avoid the higher presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 5600 and RX 6800 XT ranks 611th out of 1733 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the upper third of all configurations. This ranking reflects the balance between the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s high-end capabilities, though it also highlights that there are more powerful pairings available. The 65th percentile position is respectable, but the data shows that the combo is not among the elite configurations for this game, particularly at 4K where the GPU’s limitations become apparent.

The ranking is influenced by the fact that many higher-ranked combos likely feature newer GPUs with improved ray tracing or more recent CPU architectures that provide better scaling at high resolutions. However, this combo’s strength lies in its consistency across resolutions—it does not exhibit any dramatic weaknesses, and the 1080p results are comparable to much more expensive configurations. The percentileVsAllGpus score of 87 for the RX 6800 XT and 79 for the Ryzen 5 5600 indicate that both components are strong individually, but the combo’s overall rank suggests that the pairing does not unlock any unique synergies that would boost it above its individual component rankings. For users with this hardware, the data indicates that the best experience is at 1440p, where the combo’s performance is most competitive relative to its rank.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2250 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 89.7
3840x2160 Medium 67.1
3840x2160 High 57.4
3840x2160 Ultra 45.7
2560x1440 Low 165.8
2560x1440 Medium 127.8
2560x1440 High 107.4
2560x1440 Ultra 82.3
1920x1080 Low 257.5
1920x1080 Medium 198.5
1920x1080 High 165.7
1920x1080 Ultra 127.9

Minimum with Ryzen 5 5600 + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 6800 XT + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600 + RX 6800 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.