Minimum
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 123 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 58 | 66 | 91 |
| 1440p QHD | 81 | 105 | 127 | 164 |
| 1080p Full HD | 127 | 167 | 201 | 242 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT delivers a solid mid-to-high-tier experience in Minimum, landing in the 637th position out of 1,733 tested combinations. That placement places it in the upper third of all combos, indicating a well-balanced setup that handles the game’s demands without significant bottlenecks. The CPU's percentile rank of 77 among all processors and the GPU's 87th percentile among all graphics cards suggest that the graphics card is the stronger component, but the pairing still yields strong overall performance. This combo sits comfortably above the median, making it a reliable choice for smooth gameplay at most settings, though the data reveals clear limits at the highest resolutions and quality presets.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 637 out of 1,733 tested configurations places it firmly in the upper echelon of results for Minimum. While it does not challenge the top-tier setups, it outperforms the majority of alternatives, with roughly 63% of tested combos landing below it. This positioning is largely driven by the RX 6800 XT’s substantial graphics horsepower, which excels in this third-person shooter. The CPU, while not a top performer in synthetic benchmarks, provides sufficient support to avoid crippling frame rate drops. Compared to the GPU’s nearest rivals, the RX 6800 XT scores 2.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, and 0.5% higher than the Intel Arc A550M, reinforcing its strength in this context. The CPU’s nearest rivals show a tighter spread, with the Intel Core i7-10700F just 0.7% ahead, indicating that the Ryzen 5 2600 is competitive but not dominant in its class. For Minimum, this combo ranks as a strong mid-pack performer, capable of high frame rates at lower resolutions but showing strain at 4K Ultra.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 brings 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, built on the Zen architecture. In Minimum, a third-person shooter that relies on both physics and rendering, the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are relevant, but the game’s engine appears to lean more heavily on the GPU. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,186 and single-core score of 1,579 indicate moderate processing power, which is adequate for maintaining frame pacing at 1080p and 1440p but becomes a limiting factor at lower settings where the GPU is less taxed. For instance, at 1080p Low, the combo reaches 242.1 FPS, suggesting the CPU can keep up with high draw calls, but the gap between 1080p and 4K results shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 13,160 places it near the Intel Core i5-1345U (which is 0.4% ahead), but its single-thread score of 2,239 lags behind more modern chips, which can impact minimum frame times in CPU-intensive scenes. Overall, the Ryzen 5 2600 provides a stable foundation, but it does not boost the combo beyond what the GPU can deliver, especially at higher resolutions where the RX 6800 XT’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth take precedence.
FAQ
Q: How does this combo perform at 1080p Ultra settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 126.7 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. This indicates that the RX 6800 XT is fully utilized, while the Ryzen 5 2600 handles the CPU load without major frame drops.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 4K resolution?
A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, the average FPS drops to 46.6 at Ultra settings, while at 1080p Ultra it is 126.7 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 4K suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as the CPU’s workload does not increase proportionally with resolution, making the RX 6800 XT the primary constraint at 4K.
Q: Which settings provide the best balance of visuals and performance?
A: At 1440p, Medium settings deliver 127.2 FPS, which is nearly identical to 1080p Ultra’s 126.7 FPS, while offering higher resolution. This makes 1440p Medium a strong choice for a balance between image quality and frame rate, as it stays above 120 FPS without pushing the GPU to its limits.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The RX 6800 XT has an average benchmark score of 49,982, which is 0.5% higher than the Intel Arc A550M and 1.9% higher than the NVIDIA CMP 50HX. It trails the NVIDIA RTX A1000 by 1.7%, but in Minimum, its performance at 4K High (58 FPS) shows it can handle demanding presets.
Q: What is the CPU’s standing relative to similar processors?
A: The Ryzen 5 2600’s average benchmark score is 19,616, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U and 0.7% lower than the Intel Core i7-10700F. It performs nearly identically to the Intel Core i5-1345U, which is 0.4% ahead, indicating it remains competitive for its generation.
Q: Can this combo maintain high frame rates at 1440p?
A: Yes, at 2560x1440, the combo achieves 163.5 FPS on Low settings, 127.2 FPS on Medium, and 104.5 FPS on High. These numbers show that even at High settings, the combo stays above 100 FPS, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo starts at 242.1 FPS on Low, drops to 201 FPS on Medium, 166.8 FPS on High, and 126.7 FPS on Ultra. This scaling shows a predictable decline as graphical fidelity increases, with the Ultra preset still delivering well over 120 FPS, ideal for competitive play. Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS falls to 163.5 on Low, 127.2 on Medium, 104.5 on High, and 81.2 on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra at 1440p is about 50%, indicating that the GPU is handling the extra pixel count but the settings have a significant impact. At 3840x2160, the results become more constrained: 91.4 FPS on Low, 65.5 FPS on Medium, 58 FPS on High, and 46.6 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Ultra figure falls below 60 FPS, suggesting that the combo struggles with the highest settings at this resolution. The data shows that 1440p High (104.5 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (126.7 FPS) are the sweet spots for a smooth experience, while 4K requires turning down settings to maintain playability.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K reveals how the combo scales with resolution and where the bottleneck lies. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 126.7, which drops to 81.2 at 1440p Ultra (a 36% reduction) and further to 46.6 at 4K Ultra (a 63% reduction from 1080p). This steep decline indicates that the RX 6800 XT is the primary limiting factor as resolution increases, since the CPU’s workload remains relatively constant while the GPU’s pixel processing demands grow exponentially. On Low settings, the scaling is less severe: 242.1 FPS at 1080p, 163.5 FPS at 1440p (a 32% drop), and 91.4 FPS at 4K (a 62% drop from 1080p). The consistent percentage drops across settings suggest that the GPU is fully saturated at higher resolutions, while the CPU has headroom to spare. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the FPS to remain flat or even increase at higher resolutions, but the data shows a clear downward trend tied to pixel count. This analysis confirms that the Ryzen 5 2600 provides adequate processing power for Minimum, but the RX 6800 XT’s 16 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are the determining factors for performance at 4K, where even High settings dip to 58 FPS. For users targeting 4K, the data suggests reducing settings to Medium (65.5 FPS) or Low (91.4 FPS) to achieve playable frame rates, while 1440p offers the best balance of visual quality and speed.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 91.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 65.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 58.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 46.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 163.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 127.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 104.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 81.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 242.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 201.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 166.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 126.7 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 6800 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RX 6800 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.