Minimum
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 131 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 48 | 61 | 72 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 89 | 118 | 139 | 177 |
| 1080p Full HD | 136 | 181 | 213 | 237 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
This combo places the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti squarely in the upper tier of tested configurations for Minimum, ranking 519th out of 1,733 combos. That places it in the 70th percentile of all systems tested, a strong result for a pairing that mixes a 2018 six-core processor with a 2021 flagship-class GPU. The data shows a system that can comfortably handle this Third-Person Shooter, but the relationship between the CPU and GPU creates distinct bottlenecks depending on resolution and settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The 519th rank out of 1,733 tested combos indicates this pairing sits above the median but not at the absolute top. The RTX 3080 Ti carries most of the weight here, as its average benchmark score of 41,224 places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The Ryzen 5 2600, with an average score of 19,616, sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The gap between these percentile positions suggests the GPU has more headroom than the CPU can consistently feed, particularly at lower resolutions.
Against its nearest CPU rivals, the Ryzen 5 2600 shows a tight cluster. It trails the Intel Core i5-11600KF by 0.6% and the Intel Core i5-1345U by 0.4%, while leading the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U by 0.6% and the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.7%. These margins are negligible in real-world gaming, meaning the CPU is not an outlier in either direction. The GPU side shows a similar pattern: the RTX 3080 Ti sits within 1.6% of its nearest rivals, including the RTX 3090 (0.5% slower) and the RTX 5070 (1.1% slower). The practical takeaway is that this combo is balanced within its peer group, with no single component dragging the other down dramatically.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 4K with playable framerates?*
A: Yes, but only on lower presets. At 3840x2160, the High preset produces 61.2 FPS, while Low reaches 95.1 FPS. Ultra drops to 47.9 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How much faster is this at 1080p compared to 4K?
A: At High settings, the jump from 4K to 1080p increases average FPS from 61.2 to 181.4, a nearly 3x improvement. At Low settings, the jump is from 95.1 to 236.7 FPS.
Q: Which setting preset delivers the highest frame rate?
A: Low settings at every resolution produce the highest FPS. At 1080p, Low hits 236.7 FPS, which is 23 FPS higher than Medium and 100 FPS higher than Ultra.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti being bottlenecked by the Ryzen 5 2600?
A: The data suggests yes at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the FPS gap between Low and Medium is only 23.3 FPS, while at 4K the gap is also 23 FPS. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads at 3.90 GHz boost likely cap performance before the GPU can fully stretch.
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*
A: For 60+ FPS at High settings, 1440p is the sweet spot, delivering 118.1 FPS. At 4K High, it just barely clears 60 FPS at 61.2, making 1440p the safer choice for consistent high refresh rates.
Q: Does the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM matter for this game?
A: With a 2014 release, Minimum is not VRAM-intensive by modern standards. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are far beyond what this title requires, so VRAM is not a limiting factor.
GPU Role
The RTX 3080 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications reflect that. With 10,240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, it has the raw throughput to crush a game from 2014. The boost clock of 1665 MHz, combined with 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, explains why even at 4K Ultra the combo still manages 47.9 FPS despite the older CPU. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is excessive for Minimum but ensures zero memory-related stutters.
The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41,224, places it just below the RTX 3090 (41,441) and slightly above the RTX 5070 (41,687). In practice, this means the RTX 3080 Ti is not the limiting factor at any resolution. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 4K Ultra, the system still produces 47.9 FPS, which is a GPU-bound result. The card’s 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores are irrelevant for this title, but they contribute to its overall benchmark strength.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all presets. Low settings hit 236.7 FPS, Medium reaches 213.4 FPS, and High produces 181.4 FPS. Even the demanding Ultra preset clears 135.9 FPS, making this resolution entirely CPU-limited. The spread from Low to Ultra is 100.8 FPS, indicating that the CPU can push high frame rates but the GPU has headroom to spare.
Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers remain strong but the gap narrows. Low settings produce 177 FPS, Medium drops to 139.2 FPS, and High delivers 118.1 FPS. Ultra falls to 89.2 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra here is 87.8 FPS, slightly smaller than at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is beginning to take on more load.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary driver. High settings yield 61.2 FPS, just above the 60 FPS target. Medium produces 72.2 FPS, Low reaches 95.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 47.9 FPS. The resolution scaling is steep: from 1080p High to 4K High, FPS drops from 181.4 to 61.2, a 66% reduction. This is expected for a GPU-heavy workload, but the absolute numbers remain playable on all but the Ultra preset.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals where the bottleneck shifts. At High settings, 1080p yields 181.4 FPS, 1440p drops to 118.1 FPS, and 4K falls to 61.2 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is a 35% reduction, while 1440p to 4K is a 48% reduction. This non-linear scaling indicates that at 1080p, the Ryzen 5 2600 is holding back performance, as the GPU could likely push higher numbers if the CPU allowed.
At Low settings, the pattern is similar but more pronounced. 1080p Low hits 236.7 FPS, 1440p Low drops to 177 FPS, and 4K Low falls to 95.1 FPS. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 25%, while 1440p to 4K is 46%. The larger drop at higher resolutions confirms that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as pixel count increases. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads at 3.90 GHz boost are sufficient for 1080p but cannot sustain the frame rates the GPU could theoretically deliver at that resolution.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the High preset at 1440p is the standout choice. It delivers 118.1 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target and close to the 120 Hz refresh rate many monitors support. At 4K, High is still viable at 61.2 FPS, but the margin is thin. Players seeking a smoother 4K experience should drop to Medium, which yields 72.2 FPS, or Low for 95.1 FPS.
At 1080p, Ultra is the best choice for visual fidelity, as it still delivers 135.9 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra costs 45.5 FPS, but the resulting frame rate remains high. For competitive play, Low at 1080p (236.7 FPS) or 1440p (177 FPS) offers the fastest response times. The data shows that Medium is rarely the optimal choice: it offers only marginal gains over High at 4K (72.2 vs 61.2 FPS) but at the cost of visual quality.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is the weaker link in this pairing. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it lacks the high single-thread performance needed to fully feed the RTX 3080 Ti at lower resolutions. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz are modest by modern standards, and its 16 MB of shared L3 cache is a fraction of what newer processors offer. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 19,616 places it in the 77th percentile, but its nearest rivals show it is within 0.7% of several competing chips, indicating it is not a performance outlier.
In Minimum, the CPU’s limitations appear at 1080p. The gap between Low (236.7 FPS) and Medium (213.4 FPS) is only 23.3 FPS, suggesting the CPU is nearing its ceiling. At 4K, the same gap is 22.9 FPS, but here the GPU is the limiting factor. The Ryzen 5 2600’s dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional for a game from 2014. The 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier indicate this is a power-efficient chip that can be overclocked, but the stock boost clock of 3.90 GHz leaves little headroom. Overall, the CPU is sufficient for 60+ FPS at 1440p and 4K, but it prevents the system from reaching the full potential of the RTX 3080 Ti at 1080p.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 95.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 72.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 61.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 177.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 139.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 118.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 89.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 236.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 213.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 181.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 135.9 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.