Minecraft
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 179 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 81 | 102 | 128 |
| 1440p QHD | 96 | 154 | 194 | 245 |
| 1080p Full HD | 153 | 244 | 308 | 389 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minecraft with Intel Core i5-10400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
# How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT achieves a combo rank of 2619 out of 3710 tested combinations in Minecraft. This places the pairing in the lower-middle portion of the database, at roughly the 70th percentile of all combos tested for this game. The rank reflects a system that is far from the top tier for Minecraft, but it is by no means a weak performer — it sits within the majority of tested configurations that deliver a playable experience.
The CPU itself holds a percentile rank of 68 against all tested processors, while the GPU holds a percentile rank of 70 against all tested graphics cards. These two components are well-matched in terms of their relative standing, which suggests a balanced pairing where neither component is dramatically over- or under-powered relative to the other. The combo's overall rank of 2619 out of 3710 is consistent with what one would expect from two mid-tier components working together, rather than a bottleneck scenario where one part drags the other down.
In practical terms, this combo's rank indicates that there are roughly 1,100 tested combinations that outperform it in Minecraft, and about 2,400 that it outperforms. This is a solid position for a system built around components from the 2020-2021 era, and the measured frame rates confirm that the pairing is capable of handling the game across all tested resolutions and settings.
# GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. The GPU's base clock is 1968 MHz, with a game clock of 2359 MHz and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. These clocks are substantial for a mid-range card, and the boost behavior directly influences how the card performs in a game like Minecraft that can be sensitive to raw GPU throughput at higher resolutions.
The card's compute resources include 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also packs 32 ray tracing cores, though Minecraft's traditional rendering path does not heavily utilize these. The pixel rate is 165.7 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 331.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 10.60 TFLOPS. These numbers indicate a card that is well-equipped for the fill-rate and shading demands of Minecraft, particularly at 1080p and 1440p where the measured frame rates are very high.
The GPU's benchmark scores corroborate its mid-range positioning. It scores 16461 in Passmark G3D, 7520 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 80503 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, has an average score that is 0.7% lower, while the Intel Arc A350M is 0.8% higher. Interestingly, the RX 6600 XT also sits within 1.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER in average benchmark score, which suggests that in synthetic workloads, this card punches well above its class. However, in Minecraft specifically, the measured frame rates show that the GPU is more than sufficient for the game's demands, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU becomes the limiting factor.
# Resolution Scaling
The measured frame rates show a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 244 at 1080p to 154 at 1440p and finally to 81 at 4K. This represents a 37% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 47% drop from 1440p to 4K. The total drop from 1080p to 4K is 67%, which is a substantial reduction but one that still leaves the game playable at 4K High.
The scaling tells a story about which component is limiting performance at each resolution. At 1080p High, the frame rate of 244 FPS is high enough that the CPU is likely the primary constraint, since the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly. As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes more heavily loaded, and the frame rates drop accordingly. At 4K High, the 81 FPS average suggests that the GPU is now doing most of the heavy lifting, but the CPU is still keeping up adequately.
The Low settings data reinforces this interpretation. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 389 FPS, which is clearly CPU-bound territory. At 1440p Low, it drops to 245 FPS, and at 4K Low, it reaches 128 FPS. The 4K Low result is particularly telling — even with minimal GPU load, the frame rate only reaches 128 FPS, which suggests that the CPU is still able to keep the GPU fed at this resolution, but the game's engine has inherent limits that prevent higher frame rates. The pattern across all settings is consistent: resolution scaling has a significant impact on performance, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.
# Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 389 FPS, Medium produces 308 FPS (with a minimum of 262 and maximum of 354), High produces 244 FPS, and Ultra produces 153 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system has far more performance than needed for smooth gameplay, with even Ultra settings providing well over 144 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very strong. Low settings average 245 FPS, Medium averages 194 FPS (with a minimum of 165 and maximum of 224), High averages 154 FPS, and Ultra averages 96 FPS. At this resolution, the system still delivers a smooth experience on all settings, though Ultra drops below the 100 FPS threshold that many gamers consider ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.
At 3840x2160, the performance becomes more varied. Low settings average 128 FPS, Medium averages 102 FPS (with a minimum of 86 and maximum of 117), High averages 81 FPS, and Ultra averages 50 FPS. The 4K results show that the system can handle 4K gaming in Minecraft, but Ultra settings push the frame rate down to a level that may be less than ideal for competitive play. The Medium settings at 4K, with an average of 102 FPS and a minimum of 86 FPS, offer the best balance of visual quality and performance at this resolution.
# Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, all settings deliver playable frame rates, with even Ultra averaging 153 FPS. For gamers with a 144 Hz monitor, High settings at 244 FPS or Ultra at 153 FPS are both excellent choices. For those with a 240 Hz display, Medium settings at 308 FPS are the best option, as this is the highest measured setting that exceeds 300 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts slightly. For a 144 Hz monitor, Ultra settings at 96 FPS are playable but not ideal, while High settings at 154 FPS are a better match. Medium settings at 194 FPS provide additional headroom for those with higher refresh rate displays. Low settings at 245 FPS are the best choice for competitive players who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity.
At 3840x2160, the choices narrow considerably. Ultra settings at 50 FPS are only suitable for gamers who prioritize visual quality over smoothness. High settings at 81 FPS are acceptable for 60 Hz displays but not ideal. Medium settings at 102 FPS, with a minimum of 86 FPS, offer the best experience at 4K, providing a smooth frame rate while maintaining reasonable visual quality. Low settings at 128 FPS are the best option for those who want high frame rates at 4K.
Overall, the data suggests that Medium settings provide the best experience across all resolutions, as they consistently deliver frame rates that are well above the minimum thresholds for smooth gameplay while still offering a good balance of visual quality. The measured minimum FPS data for Medium settings (262 at 1080p, 165 at 1440p, and 86 at 4K) shows that the system maintains stable frame rates without significant drops.
# CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 14 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, and it connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.
In Minecraft, the CPU's role is significant, particularly at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The benchmark data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 389 FPS, which is a strong indicator of CPU performance in the game's single-threaded workloads. The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by benchmarks such as Passmark Single Thread (2541), Cinebench R23 Single Core (1451), and 3DMark Single Thread (688), is solid for a mid-range processor from its generation.
The multi-threaded performance is also relevant, as Minecraft can utilize multiple threads for chunk loading and world generation. The CPU scores 10283 in Cinebench R23 Multi Core, 4318 in Cinebench R20 Multi Core, and 12115 in Passmark Multi Thread. These scores indicate that the processor can handle the game's background tasks without causing frame drops. The 3DMark Multi-Thread scores (4748 for 16 threads, 4735 for max threads) further confirm that the CPU scales well with additional threads.
The CPU's overall average benchmark score of 14185 places it at the 68th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6756E (0.2% higher score), the Intel Core 7 160UL (0.3% lower), the AMD EPYC 7552 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (0.6% lower). This positioning shows that the i5-10400F is competitive with a range of processors, including some server-class parts, in synthetic benchmarks. In Minecraft specifically, the measured frame rates show that the CPU is more than adequate for the game, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor only at higher resolutions.
# FAQ
Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Minecraft?
A: The Intel Core i5-10400F with AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT ranks 2619 out of 3710 tested combos in Minecraft, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve high frame rates?
A: At 1920x1080, the combo achieves over 150 FPS on all settings, with Low settings reaching 389 FPS. This makes 1080p the best resolution for high frame rates.
Q: What settings provide the most stable frame rates at 4K?
A: Medium settings at 3840x2160 offer an average of 102 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS, making it the most stable option for 4K gaming with this combo.
Q: How does the RX 6600 XT's benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?
A: The RX 6600 XT has an average benchmark score of 24442, which is 0.7% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER.
Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?
A: The Intel Core i5-10400F has a boost clock of 4.30 GHz and a base clock of 2.90 GHz.
Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-10400F
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-10400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT in Minecraft
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 128.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 102.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 81.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 50.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 245.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 194.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 154.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 96.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 389.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 308.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 244.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 153.0 |
Minecraft with ii5-10400F + Other GPUs
See how Minecraft performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minecraft with RX 6600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minecraft performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-10400F + RX 6600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.