Microsoft Flight Simulator
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 74 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 45 | 57 | 76 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 62 | 82 | 102 |
| 1080p Full HD | 69 | 72 | 99 | 124 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis
The data for Microsoft Flight Simulator on the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 combination reveals a system that is heavily influenced by both resolution and graphics settings. The measured FPS across the board indicates a hardware pairing that delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K remains a significant challenge, particularly at higher quality presets. This analysis breaks down the performance metrics, the roles of the individual components, and how this specific combo ranks within the broader database.
Resolution Scaling
The relationship between resolution and average frame rate is stark in this dataset. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 123.8 FPS. This drops to 98.5 FPS at Medium, 72.1 FPS at High, and 69.2 FPS at Ultra. The scaling is not linear; moving from Low to Medium costs 25.3 FPS, while the step from Medium to High costs another 26.4 FPS. The transition from High to Ultra is comparatively minor, costing only 2.9 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset at 1080p is beginning to hit a performance ceiling that is less sensitive to incremental increases in quality.
At 1440p, the same settings produce 102.1 FPS (Low), 81.6 FPS (Medium), 61.8 FPS (High), and 56.0 FPS (Ultra). The delta between 1080p and 1440p grows with each quality step. At Low, the drop is 21.7 FPS; at Medium, it is 16.9 FPS; at High, it is 10.3 FPS; and at Ultra, it is 13.2 FPS. This pattern suggests that while the resolution increase puts more load on the GPU, the CPU is still able to feed frames adequately at these settings, keeping the frame rate relatively high.
The 4K results tell a different story. At 3840x2160, the average FPS is 76.0 (Low), 56.7 (Medium), 44.8 (High), and 44.1 (Ultra). The drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic: 47.8 FPS at Low, 41.8 FPS at Medium, 27.3 FPS at High, and 25.1 FPS at Ultra. The most significant observation is the compression of the FPS range at 4K. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 31.9 FPS, compared to a 54.6 FPS difference at 1080p. This indicates that at 4K, the system is becoming severely GPU-limited; the rendering resolution demands so much pixel throughput that the CPU’s ability to submit draw calls becomes secondary. The RTX 5060’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are being saturated, making the GPU the clear limiting factor.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. Its benchmark scores show a balanced profile: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15045 and single-core score of 2124. In a simulation-heavy title like Microsoft Flight Simulator, single-threaded performance is often critical for game logic and physics, while multi-core performance helps with asset streaming and AI. The 3dmark_8_threads score of 3844 is significantly higher than the 2_threads score of 1361, indicating that the CPU scales well with additional threads up to a point.
The data suggests the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 123.8 FPS average is likely near the CPU’s practical limit for this game’s frame pacing, but the GPU is still able to keep up with the reduced pixel load. However, the fact that the 1080p Ultra score (69.2 FPS) is only slightly higher than the 1440p Ultra score (56.0 FPS) and the 4K Ultra score (44.1 FPS) reveals that the CPU is still a relevant factor. If the CPU were entirely sufficient, the FPS would scale more predictably with resolution. Instead, the relatively modest gains at lower resolutions for Ultra settings suggest that the Ryzen 5 3600’s thread scheduling is handling the simulation’s demands, but it is not so powerful that it removes the GPU from the equation entirely.
Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 3600 sits within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-11400 and the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 in average benchmark score, with deltaPct values of -0.1 and -0.2 respectively. This indicates that for this game, the CPU’s performance is on par with those alternatives; any FPS differences in the measured results are more likely attributable to the GPU than to the CPU’s computational throughput. The CPU’s 65W TDP and 7 nm process node suggest it is an efficient part, but efficiency does not translate to high frame rates in a heavily GPU-bound scenario like 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of 1795 tested combinations, the Ryzen 5 3600 and RTX 5060 pairing achieves a rank of 847. This places it almost exactly in the middle of the distribution. The percentile data for the individual components reinforces this: the CPU sits at the 76th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all GPUs. A middle-of-the-pack combo rank suggests that while each component is above average individually, the pairing does not create a synergistic effect that pushes it into the upper echelon. This is typical of a balanced mid-range setup where neither component is the clear star.
The combo’s rank of 847 out of 1795 means it outperforms roughly 53% of all recorded combinations. This is a solid result, but it is not exceptional. The data shows that in Microsoft Flight Simulator, this combo is more likely to be found in the middle of the pack, where frame rates are respectable but not top-tier. The implication is that users with this setup will need to make compromises in settings or resolution, especially at 4K, to maintain smooth gameplay. The rank is a direct consequence of the measured FPS, which, as discussed, shows a system that is capable at 1080p and 1440p but struggles to maintain high averages at 4K.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p Ultra settings?
A: The combo achieves an average of 69.2 FPS at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.
Q: Is this system better suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming?
A: The data shows strong performance at both. At 1080p High, the average is 72.1 FPS, while at 1440p High, it drops to 61.8 FPS. Both are playable, but 1080p offers a higher headroom above 60 FPS.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 30109, which is exactly 0% different from the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, which scores 30097. It is also 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, which scores 29928.
Q: What is the limiting factor at 4K resolution?
A: The data indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor. The FPS range between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 31.9 FPS (76.0 to 44.1), suggesting that the RTX 5060’s rendering capabilities are being saturated by the pixel count.
Q: Does the CPU hold the system back at lower resolutions?
A: At 1080p Low, the 123.8 FPS average suggests the CPU is still able to feed the GPU adequately. However, the performance difference between 1080p and 1440p at Ultra settings (69.2 vs 56.0 FPS) indicates the CPU is not a severe bottleneck, but it also does not allow the GPU to run entirely unconstrained.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?
A: The launch MSRP of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is $199.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the primary driver of visual output in this combo. It features a boost clock of 2497 MHz, 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, and a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its FP32 performance is rated at 19.18 TFLOPS. These specs place it in a solid mid-range position, as evidenced by its 73rd percentile ranking among all GPUs. The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, has a nearly identical average benchmark score (30097 vs 30109, a 0% deltaPct), confirming that the RTX 5060 is a competitive part for its class.
In the context of Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU’s role becomes increasingly critical as resolution rises. At 1080p, the GPU has enough headroom to render frames quickly, but the CPU’s ability to process the simulation’s data is still a factor. At 4K, the GPU is unquestionably the bottleneck. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra (44.1) versus 4K Low (76.0) shows a 31.9 FPS swing, but the fact that these numbers are all well below the 1080p equivalents demonstrates the GPU’s inability to maintain high frame rates under extreme pixel loads. The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while adequate for 1080p and 1440p, may be a limiting factor at 4K with high-resolution textures, potentially causing the engine to swap assets in and out of system memory.
The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 30 RT cores suggest it is capable of handling modern rendering features, but the measured data does not isolate those effects. The overall benchmark results indicate that the RTX 5060 is a capable partner for the Ryzen 5 3600, but the combo’s mid-pack rank of 847 out of 1795 underscores that this is not a high-end pairing. The GPU’s performance is solid, but it is not sufficient to overcome the demands of 4K Ultra in a sim-heavy title like this one. For users prioritizing high frame rates at 1440p, the data shows this is a viable option, but for 4K, lowering settings to Medium or Low is necessary to achieve playable averages.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Microsoft Flight Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 76.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 44.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 102.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 81.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 61.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 56.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 123.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 98.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 72.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 69.2 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + RTX 5060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.