Inside

Inside is a 2D puzzle platformer from 2016, and the benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT shows a system that utterly demolishes this title. The measured frame rates are exceptionally high across all settings and resolutions, indicating that this combination is massive overkill for the game’s graphical demands. The data suggests that the primary bottleneck at lower resolutions shifts to the CPU, but even then, the performance is far beyond what any display can realistically utilize.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear transition in what limits performance. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces 321.3 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at Low settings, that figure drops to 290.1 FPS, a relatively modest decline that indicates the CPU is still heavily involved in dictating the frame rate. By the time resolution reaches 3840x2160 at Low settings, the average FPS falls to 191.4, showing a more significant drop as the GPU begins to take on more work.

The pattern is even more distinct at higher graphical presets. At High settings, the frame rate goes from 213 FPS at 1080p to 151 FPS at 1440p, and then down to 96.6 FPS at 4K. This represents a 55% reduction from 1080p to 4K. For Ultra settings, the progression is 199.6 FPS at 1080p, 148 FPS at 1440p, and 89.4 FPS at 4K. The consistent and steep decline at 4K across all presets points directly to the GPU becoming the limiting factor, as the pixel fill rate demands of 3840x2160 are substantial. The data indicates that while the CPU is strong enough to hold very high frame rates at lower resolutions, the Radeon RX 6800 XT is the component that determines performance headroom when resolution scales up.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Inside at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes, the benchmark data shows an average of 89.4 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is well above the standard 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay, confirming that the RX 6800 XT has ample power for this title at 4K.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 290.1 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 148 FPS. This is a 49% reduction in frame rate from Low to Ultra, showing that the graphical settings have a significant impact on performance, but even the lower Ultra score is exceptionally high.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for performance in this game?

A: At 1080p and 1440p with lower settings, the frame rates are so high that the CPU likely limits the maximum output. However, at 4K, the frame rate difference between the Low and Ultra presets is 191.4 FPS versus 89.4 FPS, indicating the GPU is the primary component handling the increased graphical load.

Q: How does the combo rank against other tested systems for this game?

A: The combination ranks 514th out of 1671 tested combos. This places it in the top 31% of all tested configurations, which is a strong result, though not the absolute top tier, likely due to the game’s age and the sheer number of higher-end or newer systems tested.

Q: What is the best resolution to play at for a 240Hz monitor?

A: To fully utilize a 240Hz display, the system would need to consistently output over 240 FPS. The data shows this is only possible at 1920x1080 with Low settings, which achieves 321.3 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p also exceeds 240 FPS with 295.4 FPS.

Q: Is there a big difference between High and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is 13.4 FPS, with High at 213 FPS and Ultra at 199.6 FPS. This is a 6% performance drop for the higher preset, which is a minor cost for the potential visual improvements.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. Its 3.80 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock provide substantial single-thread performance, which is often critical for older game engines. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 959 in 3dmark_single_thread and 3359 in cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore, demonstrating strong per-core capabilities. This is relevant for Inside, a puzzle platformer that may not utilize all 16 threads effectively.

The data supports this theory. At 1080p with Low settings, the system hits 321.3 FPS. This is an extreme frame rate, and the scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p (321.3 to 199.6 FPS) shows a large dependency on the GPU’s workload. However, the relatively small difference between 1080p Low (321.3 FPS) and 1440p Low (290.1 FPS) suggests that the CPU is still managing to feed the GPU fast enough at these lower resolutions. The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores, such as 23794 in cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore, ensure that it is not a weak link in this system, even if the game does not fully utilize its 16 threads. The processor is more than capable of handling the game's logic and physics calculations without becoming a limiting factor until the GPU is fully saturated at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark results place this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at rank 514 out of 1671 tested combos for Inside. This puts it in the 69th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than two-thirds of all tested systems. This is a strong ranking, but it is not top-tier. The game’s release in 2016 means it is not particularly demanding by modern standards, so many newer CPUs and GPUs can achieve similarly high frame rates.

The ranking is likely influenced by the fact that the game’s frame rate ceiling is quite high, and many systems can reach it. The RX 6800 XT, which ranks in the 87th percentile for all GPUs and has an average benchmark score of 49982, is certainly powerful enough. However, its nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (with a deltaPct of 2.6%), are close in overall performance. The Ryzen 7 5800XT, ranking in the 86th percentile for CPUs, is similarly matched with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (deltaPct of -0.3%). The combination’s rank of 514 suggests that while it is a very capable setup, it is not at the absolute top of the leaderboard for this specific title, likely because other combinations with newer or higher-tier components can edge it out in raw frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across all settings and resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well:

• Low: 321.3 FPS
• Medium: 295.4 FPS
• High: 213 FPS
• Ultra: 199.6 FPS

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very high:

• Low: 290.1 FPS
• Medium: 244.9 FPS
• High: 151 FPS
• Ultra: 148 FPS

At 3840x2160, the GPU is finally challenged, but still delivers excellent results:

• Low: 191.4 FPS
• Medium: 154.9 FPS
• High: 96.6 FPS
• Ultra: 89.4 FPS

The most notable observation is the massive gap between Low and High settings at 1440p and 4K. At 1440p, there is a 139.1 FPS difference between Low and High, while at 4K, the difference is 94.8 FPS. This implies that the High preset introduces a significant rendering cost. In contrast, the difference between High and Ultra is much smaller at every resolution, suggesting that the Ultra preset offers diminishing returns for the performance hit.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the data strongly points to the High preset at 1440p. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the system averages 151 FPS. This is a high refresh rate experience that will look excellent on most monitors. The jump to Ultra at the same resolution yields only a 3 FPS improvement (148 FPS), which is within the margin of error and not worth the potential visual differences.

For 4K gaming, the High preset is again the optimal choice. The 96.6 FPS average at 3840x2160 is smooth and immersive. While Low settings offer 191.4 FPS, the visual downgrade would be significant. The Ultra preset at 89.4 FPS is also playable, but the 7.2 FPS difference between High and Ultra is not substantial enough to recommend the higher preset, as High provides a more comfortable buffer above 60 FPS.

If a player has a 240Hz monitor and prioritizes maximum frame rate, the Medium preset at 1080p is the best choice, averaging 295.4 FPS. This is a massive frame rate that will fully saturate a fast display, and it provides better visuals than the Low preset. The Low preset at 1080p (321.3 FPS) offers slightly more headroom, but Medium is a more balanced choice for a premium experience. For all other scenarios, the High preset offers the best combination of high frame rates and visual quality without the marginal returns of Ultra.