Inside
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 120 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 54 | 87 | 108 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 86 | 138 | 172 |
| 1080p Full HD | 114 | 120 | 192 | 240 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Inside with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that is far more demanding on frame rates than its minimalist art style suggests. The benchmark data shows this pairing is more than capable of maxing out the game at standard resolutions, though 4K Ultra presents a notable challenge. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, settings scaling, and the specific roles each component plays in achieving these results.
FAQ
*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Inside?*
A: The combo ranks 2301 out of 2887 tested combinations. This places it in the lower-mid tier of the database, which reflects that while it is perfectly playable, many other pairings offer higher raw frame rates, especially at higher settings.
*Q: Can this system run Inside at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes, it can run at 4K (3840x2160), but with caveats. At High settings, it averages 54 FPS, which is playable. At Ultra settings, the average drops to 52 FPS. However, dropping to Medium settings significantly improves performance to an average of 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, making it the recommended choice for a smooth 4K experience.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?
A: For 2560x1440, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance. It delivers an average of 138 FPS with a minimum of 117 FPS, ensuring a fluid experience on high-refresh-rate displays. High settings also perform well at 86 FPS average, but Medium provides a larger performance headroom.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck, particularly at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 240 FPS, indicating the CPU can handle a very high frame rate. As resolution and settings increase, the average FPS drops significantly, which is a classic sign of the GPU reaching its limits.
Q: How much of a performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings?
A: The difference is substantial. At 1080p, the average frame rate drops from 240 FPS on Low to 114 FPS on Ultra, a reduction of over 50%. At 4K, the gap is similar, with the average falling from 108 FPS on Low to 52 FPS on Ultra.
Q: What is the launch MSRP for these components?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has a launch MSRP of $179, and the Intel Arc B570 has a launch MSRP of 219 USD.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and the Intel Arc B570 secures the 2301st position out of 2887 tested combos in Inside. While this rank might initially seem modest, it's crucial to contextualize it. The game is a 2016 title, and the database includes many modern, high-end configurations that will naturally outperform this mid-range pairing. A rank in the 80th percentile (2301/2887) means it outperforms the majority of tested systems, placing it comfortably in the upper half of all results.
The data indicates that this system is not designed to compete for the top spots on the leaderboard but rather to deliver a solid, dependable experience. The performance gap to the top-tier combos is likely most pronounced at 4K with Ultra settings, where the Intel Arc B570's 10 GB of VRAM and 160-bit memory bus may become a limiting factor. However, for the resolutions and settings where most gamers with this class of hardware will play—1080p and 1440p—the ranking is more than adequate. The 2301st rank reflects the balanced nature of the pairing; it avoids severe bottlenecks that could result in a much lower standing. The system is a consistent performer, and its rank reflects its ability to deliver high frame rates in the mainstream sweet spot.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is the primary driver of visual output in this configuration, and its specifications directly correlate with the measured FPS. The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a significant factor in the game's performance, especially at higher resolutions where the demand for texture data and frame buffer space increases. The jump from 1080p to 4K puts considerable strain on the memory subsystem, which is a likely contributor to the significant FPS drops at 3840x2160.
Clock speeds are another key element. The Arc B570 operates at a consistent base and boost clock of 2500 MHz. With 2304 shading units, this translates to an FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS. This raw compute power is sufficient to handle the simple geometry and lighting of Inside with ease. The benchmark results show that the GPU is exceptionally strong at lower settings, achieving 240 FPS at 1080p Low, which indicates the shading units are more than capable of processing the game's basic rendering tasks at a very high rate.
The GPU's performance scaling with settings is telling. From Low to Ultra at 1080p, the average FPS drops from 240 to 114. This demonstrates that the Arc B570's performance is highly sensitive to the graphical workload. The most significant bottleneck appears to be at the Ultra preset, which likely introduces effects that are more demanding on the GPU's compute and memory resources. The 54 FPS average at 4K High and 52 FPS at 4K Ultra suggest the card is hitting its architectural limits at this resolution. In contrast, the Medium preset at 4K, which yields 87 FPS, shows that a slight reduction in settings can unlock a much smoother experience, making it the optimal setting for 4K displays with this GPU.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends entirely on the target resolution and the user's preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity. For users with a 1920x1080 monitor, the High preset is an excellent choice, delivering a smooth 120 FPS average. However, for those with high-refresh-rate displays, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 is the standout option, offering a superb 192 FPS average with a minimum of 163 FPS, ensuring a highly responsive and fluid experience without a significant visual compromise from Low settings.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation. It achieves an average of 138 FPS and a minimum of 117 FPS, which is ideal for 120Hz or 144Hz monitors. While the High preset provides an acceptable 86 FPS, the Medium preset offers a much larger performance headroom and is better suited for maintaining a stable, high frame rate. The jump from High to Ultra at 1440p results in a notable performance cost, dropping to 82 FPS, making Medium the sweet spot for a balance between image quality and speed.
For 4K (3840x2160) displays, the Medium preset is the only sensible choice for a consistently smooth experience. It provides an average of 87 FPS and a minimum of 74 FPS, which is playable and largely stable. The High preset, at 54 FPS, is on the edge of playability, and the Ultra preset, at 52 FPS, risks dipping into less comfortable territory during more complex scenes. The data clearly indicates that the visual uplift from Medium to High at 4K is not worth the nearly 40% performance hit. Therefore, Medium is recommended for 4K, High for 1080p, and Medium for 1440p as the presets that offer the best measured experience.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results provide a comprehensive look at performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system performs exceptionally well. The Low preset achieves a 240 FPS average, indicating a very high ceiling for the CPU and GPU. Medium settings deliver 192 FPS (min 163, max 221), High settings reach 120 FPS, and the Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still produces a very playable 114 FPS average. This resolution is where the combo shines, providing more than enough power for even the fastest monitors.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong. The Low preset averages 172 FPS, showcasing the system's capability. The Medium preset is a highlight, with an average of 138 FPS and a minimum of 117 FPS, ensuring a stable and fluid experience. High settings maintain a solid 86 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 82 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is roughly a 30-40% reduction in FPS across all settings, which is a typical and expected cost for the increased pixel count.
At 3840x2160, the performance demands become significant. The Low preset still manages a respectable 108 FPS average, showing the system isn't completely overwhelmed. The Medium preset is the most viable option for 4K, producing an 87 FPS average with a minimum of 74 FPS. However, the High and Ultra presets struggle to maintain high frame rates, with averages of 54 FPS and 52 FPS, respectively. This data shows a clear performance cliff at 4K, where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor and only the Low and Medium presets provide a consistently smooth experience.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture. Its specifications, including a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, are more than sufficient for a game like Inside, which is not known for being heavily multi-threaded. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3dmark single-thread score of 974 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3841, is crucial for maintaining high frame rates and ensuring the game logic runs smoothly.
The data strongly suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck in this configuration. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 240 FPS. This high frame rate indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to reach its maximum output. The performance drops seen at higher resolutions and settings are almost entirely attributable to the GPU's workload, not the CPU. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth ensure that data can be processed and transferred without creating a pipeline stall.
The Ryzen 5 7500F ranks in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-11850H and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, are within 0.2% of its score, confirming it is a solid, mid-range performer. In the context of Inside, this CPU provides a robust foundation. The consistent 240 FPS at 1080p Low is a clear indicator that the processor can handle the game's maximum potential frame output, leaving the Intel Arc B570 as the sole determinant of visual settings and resolution performance. This pairing works well because the CPU's capabilities comfortably exceed the demands of the game, ensuring the GPU is always the limiting factor.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B570 in Inside
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 108.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 87.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 52.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 172.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 138.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 86.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 82.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 240.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 192.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 120.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 114.0 |
Inside with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs
See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Inside with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.