Fivem

This combo pairing the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a top-tier configuration for Fivem, and the benchmark data confirms it sits in the upper echelon of tested systems. While Fivem is a multiplayer title that can be sensitive to both CPU and GPU load, this pairing delivers exceptionally high frame rates across all tested resolutions, making it a strong candidate for high-refresh-rate displays.

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this specific combination at rank 155 out of 3005 tested combos for Fivem. That puts it in the top 5% of all configurations tested on this site, which is an impressive feat for a game that often shows wildly varying performance across different hardware. The ranking reflects that this pairing is well-balanced for the title, avoiding the severe bottlenecks that can plague other high-end systems in Fivem's multiplayer environments.

The CPU itself holds a 96th percentile ranking against all CPUs in our database, while the GPU sits at an 87th percentile against all GPUs. This slight imbalance—where the processor is more dominant relative to its peers than the graphics card—suggests that the CPU is doing substantial heavy lifting in this game. The combo's overall position at 155 out of 3005 indicates that while there are faster systems, they are relatively rare, and this configuration is firmly in the enthusiast tier.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is nearly identical in average benchmark score, with a delta of just 0.2% in favor of the 290K Plus. This means the 290K Plus is essentially a refined version of the 285K, offering marginal gains that translate to single-digit percentage improvements in Fivem's frame rates. The other nearest rivals are AMD EPYC server processors, which are not typical gaming chips, so their presence in the comparison list is more academic than practical for Fivem players.

For the GPU, the RTX 5080's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, with deltas of 0.6% and 0.7% respectively. This is a curious grouping, as it suggests that in the synthetic benchmark used for ranking, the RTX 5080 is closely matched by these AMD parts. However, the RTX 5080's advantage in Fivem will be more pronounced due to its architecture and driver optimization, which the raw benchmark scores do not fully capture.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is built on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, using a 3 nm process from TSMC. It packs 24 cores and 24 threads, which is a high core count for a desktop processor, though it notably lacks hyper-threading, so each core handles exactly one thread. The base clock runs at 3.70 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.80 GHz, providing strong single-thread performance that is critical for Fivem's often poorly optimized multiplayer code.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache. This large cache helps keep frequently accessed game data close to the cores, reducing latency in scenarios where many players are interacting in the same area. The memory support is DDR5, with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, which is adequate for feeding the 24 cores without creating a memory bottleneck.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 51,731 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7,303 in single-core. These are top-tier numbers, placing it among the fastest consumer processors available. The single-core score is particularly relevant for Fivem, as the game's engine tends to favor fewer, faster cores for main-thread tasks. The multi-core score ensures that when the game does spread load across multiple threads—such as when many NPCs or vehicles are active—the CPU has ample headroom.

The passmark multithread score of 60,860 and single-thread score of 4,823 further confirm this processor's dual capability. The passmark physics score of 3,315 is moderate, but physics in Fivem is not typically the primary bottleneck. The data compression score of 698,346 and encryption score of 52,563 are high, indicating the CPU excels at background tasks that might run alongside the game, such as streaming or recording.

Compared to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, the 290K Plus offers only a 0.2% improvement in average score. This is a negligible difference in practice, meaning that in Fivem, you would not notice the distinction between these two CPUs. The 290K Plus does have a higher boost clock at 5.80 GHz versus the 285K's 5.70 GHz, which helps in single-threaded scenarios, but the real-world impact is minimal.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB203 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process from TSMC. It comes with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is more than sufficient for Fivem, even at 4K resolution with high-resolution texture packs that some servers use.

The core clocks are set at 2,295 MHz base and 2,617 MHz boost, which are high for a graphics card in this class. The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units. It also includes 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, which are not heavily utilized in Fivem but provide future-proofing for other titles. The FP32 performance is rated at 56.28 TFLOPS, which is a strong figure for compute workloads.

In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5080 scores 36,565 in Passmark G3D and 21,789 in GPU compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 8,637, which shows solid performance in modern APIs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 235,901 and Vulkan score of 255,450 are also robust, indicating the GPU can handle both compute and graphics tasks efficiently.

The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 8060S, is only 0.6% behind in average score, but this does not tell the full story for Fivem. The RTX 5080's driver maturity and feature set, including DirectX 12 Ultimate support, give it an edge in this title. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, which allows for multi-monitor setups or high-refresh-rate 4K displays. The card draws up to 360 W and requires a 750 W power supply, which is manageable for most high-end builds.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals how this combo scales across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the performance is extremely high. With Low settings, the average FPS is 345, which is well beyond the refresh rate of most monitors. Medium settings drop this to 272 FPS, with a minimum of 232 FPS and a maximum of 313 FPS, indicating excellent consistency. High settings produce 218 FPS average, while Ultra settings still manage a very playable 169 FPS. At 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor at lower settings, as the GPU has plenty of headroom.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show more scaling with settings. Low settings yield 227 FPS average, Medium drops to 179 FPS with a minimum of 152 FPS and maximum of 206 FPS, High produces 143 FPS, and Ultra falls to 111 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1440p, the GPU begins to play a more significant role, but the combo still delivers competitive frame rates for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors, particularly at Medium and High settings.

At 3840x2160, the performance is more demanding but still respectable. Low settings produce 126 FPS average, Medium drops to 99 FPS with a minimum of 85 FPS and maximum of 114 FPS, High yields 80 FPS, and Ultra falls to 62 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, and the frame rates reflect the heavy load. The Medium setting at 4K offers a good balance, with a minimum FPS of 85 that keeps gameplay smooth, while High and Ultra are playable but may dip below 60 FPS in crowded areas.

The data shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can push very high frame rates. At 4K, it is still capable, but you will need to adjust settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The minimum FPS values recorded only for Medium settings across all resolutions indicate that this is where the combo is most stable, with no severe frame drops.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus significantly faster than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K in Fivem?

A: No. The benchmark data shows the 290K Plus is only 0.2% ahead of the 285K in average score. In Fivem, this translates to a negligible difference, so you would not notice a performance change between the two CPUs.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 80, and with Ultra settings it drops to 62 FPS. For smoother 4K gameplay, Medium settings provide an average of 99 FPS with a minimum of 85 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. At High settings, the average FPS is 143, which is ideal for a 144Hz monitor. At 1920x1080, you get higher frame rates, but the visual fidelity is lower.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to the AMD Radeon 8060S in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5080 is 0.6% ahead of the Radeon 8060S in average benchmark score. This is a minimal margin, but in real-world Fivem performance, the RTX 5080's drivers and features likely provide a larger advantage.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for Fivem performance in this combo?

A: The data suggests the CPU plays a significant role. The CPU has a 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 87th percentile, and at lower resolutions like 1080p, the frame rates are extremely high, indicating the CPU is keeping up with the GPU's output.

Q: What is the minimum FPS I can expect at 2560x1440 with Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows a minimum FPS of 152 at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, with an average of 179 FPS. This indicates stable performance with no major frame drops.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on your display's resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080, even Ultra settings provide 169 FPS average, which is playable on most high-refresh-rate monitors. However, for maximum competitive advantage, Medium settings at 272 FPS average will minimize input lag and ensure the smoothest experience. The minimum FPS at Medium is 232, which is well above the refresh rate of most 1080p monitors, so there is no risk of screen tearing or stutter.

At 2560x1440, the sweet spot is High settings, which delivers 143 FPS average. This pairs perfectly with a 144Hz monitor. If you have a 165Hz or 240Hz display, dropping to Medium settings gives 179 FPS average, with a minimum of 152 FPS that stays above the 144Hz threshold. Ultra settings at 111 FPS are acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but not ideal for fast reactions.

For 3840x2160, the recommendation is Medium settings, which produce 99 FPS average and 85 FPS minimum. This is the only setting level at 4K with a recorded minimum FPS, indicating it is the most stable. High settings at 80 FPS average are playable if you prefer visual quality, but you may notice drops in crowded areas. Ultra settings at 62 FPS are borderline, and only recommended for single-player or low-population servers.

In summary, the best experience is achieved by matching the settings to your display's capabilities. For 1080p, use Medium or High. For 1440p, use High. For 4K, use Medium. This combo has enough power that you rarely need to compromise on frame rate, but the data shows that Medium and High settings offer the best stability with recorded minimum FPS values.