Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a high-end combination that delivers a strong 4K experience in Fivem, though it requires careful settings management to hit the 60 FPS mark at that resolution. This analysis examines the measured performance data to determine optimal configurations and contextualize the results against rival hardware.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture. It operates at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosts up to 5.80 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. This CPU sits in the 96th percentile of all processors, indicating that its raw compute capability is well above the vast majority of alternatives. In synthetic benchmarks, it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 51731 and a single-core score of 7303, alongside a Passmark single-thread score of 4823.

For Fivem, a multiplayer modification that builds on Grand Theft Auto V's engine, single-thread performance is typically the primary bottleneck due to the age and architecture of the game engine. The 290K Plus's 5.80 GHz boost clock and strong single-core scores are directly relevant here. The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 250 FPS average, which is a clear indication that the CPU is capable of driving very high frame rates. Even at 4K with Low settings, the 91 FPS average suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor at lower graphical loads, as the frame rate scales predictably with resolution.

However, the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are not wasted. Fivem's multiplayer environments often involve many entities, scripts, and other players, which can distribute load across multiple cores. The 24 threads available here provide ample headroom for these scenarios, ensuring that the game remains smooth even in busy areas. The processor's Passmark multi-thread score of 60860 and data compression score of 698346 further underscore its ability to handle complex, parallel workloads that may arise from server-side computations or modded content.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 290K Plus holds a slight edge. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and 1.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX in average benchmark score. While these deltas are small, they indicate that the 290K Plus is at the very top of the performance stack. This marginal lead may not translate to a massive difference in Fivem, but it ensures that the CPU will not be a source of frame drops or stutter in most scenarios.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the settings presets affect performance across different resolutions. The goal is to balance visual fidelity with a smooth, playable frame rate, and the data suggests different optimal presets depending on the target resolution.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the Ultra preset only achieves an average of 45 FPS, which falls below the widely accepted 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The High preset is close, at 58 FPS average, but still misses that mark. The Medium preset, however, delivers a 72 FPS average with a minimum of 61 FPS, ensuring that the experience remains fluid even in demanding scenes. This makes Medium the recommended preset for 4K, as it provides a substantial 27 FPS improvement over Ultra while maintaining better-than-High performance.

For 2560x1440 (1440p), the situation improves significantly. The Ultra preset produces 80 FPS average, which is playable, but the High preset jumps to 104 FPS average. The Medium preset offers 130 FPS average with a minimum of 110 FPS, providing excellent headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. Given that the visual difference between High and Ultra is often minimal in Fivem, High is a solid choice for 1440p, but Medium is the best option for competitive play or if the user prefers a higher frame rate buffer.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), all presets are playable, but the differences are stark. Ultra delivers 122 FPS average, which is good, but High pushes that to 157 FPS. Medium achieves 197 FPS, and Low reaches 250 FPS. For most users with a 144Hz monitor, the High preset is the sweet spot, offering a 35 FPS improvement over Ultra while still looking excellent. The Medium preset is recommended for those with 240Hz displays, as its 197 FPS average is far closer to that refresh rate, and the 167 FPS minimum ensures consistency.

In summary, the best experience is achieved by selecting Medium at 4K, High at 1440p, and High or Medium at 1080p depending on the monitor's refresh rate.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured data shows an average of 45 FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, which is below the standard 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 yields 104 FPS average, which is ideal for a 144Hz display. The Medium preset provides a higher 130 FPS average, but the visual fidelity is slightly lower.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance impact Fivem?

A: Fivem is sensitive to single-thread performance. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus has a 5.80 GHz boost clock and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7303, which helps drive high frame rates, as seen in the 250 FPS average at 1080p Low settings.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 61 FPS, which occurs at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. This indicates that even at 4K, the combo can maintain a playable frame rate without dropping below 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all other tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 1048 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the top 28% of all tested systems.

Q: Is the RTX 3080's VRAM sufficient for 4K in Fivem?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 320-bit bus. The data shows playable frame rates at 4K with Medium settings, indicating that the VRAM capacity is adequate for this game at that resolution.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Fivem, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 achieves a rank of 1048 out of 3707 combos. This places it in the 72nd percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly 72% of the combinations in the database.

This ranking is notable because it puts the combo in the upper quartile of performers. The high rank is driven by the CPU's exceptional compute power, as evidenced by its 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The RTX 3080, while being an older generation card, still performs admirably, ranking in the 68th percentile of all GPUs.

The ranking also indicates that while this combo is fast, there are many configurations that are faster. The gap between this combo and the top performers likely comes from more modern GPUs with higher VRAM and faster memory bandwidth. However, for the target audience of Fivem players, this combo provides a very strong experience, particularly at 1440p and 1080p where it can take full advantage of high refresh rate displays.

The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, scores nearly identically (0.2% delta), so users could expect very similar in-game performance with that chip. The GPU's closest rival, the NVIDIA P106-100, is a much lower-tier product, but the delta is only -0.3%, which is negligible in real-world terms.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is based on the Ampere architecture, built on Samsung's 8 nm process. It features 8704 shading units, 68 RT cores, and 272 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1440 MHz and a boost clock of 1710 MHz, with memory running at 19 Gbps effective. The 10 GB of GDDR6X memory is connected via a 320-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes more prominent at higher resolutions. The measured data shows a clear scaling pattern: at 1080p, the GPU is not the bottleneck, as frame rates are high even at Ultra settings (122 FPS). However, at 4K, the GPU's limitations become apparent. The RTX 3080's 10 GB of VRAM is sufficient for the game, but its raw compute power is challenged by the 3840x2160 resolution, leading to a 45 FPS average at Ultra settings.

The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 25086 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 reflect its strong performance, but the data shows that it is the limiting factor at 4K with high graphical presets. The 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that while the RTX 3080 is a solid performer, it is not at the top of the heap anymore.

The boost clock of 1710 MHz is crucial for sustained performance in Fivem, as the game can be demanding in open-world environments. The GPU's FP32 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS suggests that it has the theoretical throughput to handle complex shaders, but the measured FPS data is the ultimate arbiter. At 1440p, the GPU provides a 104 FPS average on High settings, which is a good result. At 4K, it requires dropping to Medium settings to achieve a smooth 72 FPS average.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for each resolution and settings preset combination, based on the FACT PACK data.

3840x2160 (4K UHD):

• Ultra: Average FPS 45. This is the lowest score across all settings and resolutions, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed at this configuration.
• High: Average FPS 58. A modest improvement over Ultra, but still below the 60 FPS target.
• Medium: Average FPS 72, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS. This is the only 4K setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice.
• Low: Average FPS 91. The best 4K result, showing that reducing graphical load significantly boosts performance.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Ultra: Average FPS 80. Playable, but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.
• High: Average FPS 104. A strong result that is well-suited for 144Hz displays.
• Medium: Average FPS 130, with a minimum of 110 FPS and a maximum of 149 FPS. This provides excellent smoothness and headroom.
• Low: Average FPS 164. The highest 1440p score, offering a competitive advantage in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Ultra: Average FPS 122. Good performance, but the GPU is starting to become less of a bottleneck.
• High: Average FPS 157. An excellent result for 144Hz monitors.
• Medium: Average FPS 197, with a minimum of 167 FPS and a maximum of 226 FPS. This is ideal for 240Hz displays, providing a consistently high frame rate.
• Low: Average FPS 250. The maximum measured score, indicating that the CPU is the primary driver at this resolution and settings level.

The data clearly shows that the RTX 3080 scales well with resolution, but the CPU's performance is the constant that allows high frame rates at lower resolutions. The 250 FPS at 1080p Low confirms the 290K Plus's single-thread capabilities. As resolution increases, the GPU's workload grows, and the frame rates drop progressively, with the Ultra preset at 4K being the most demanding scenario measured.