Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile combination delivers a performance profile that is defined by its extremes. The 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake processor provides a robust foundation, while the flagship-class mobile GPU carries the bulk of the rendering load. In Fivem, the benchmark data shows a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet reveals significant headroom in the CPU when settings are lowered. This pairing ranks in the 77.7th percentile of all tested combos in this game, indicating a formidable but not top-tier configuration for this specific multiplayer title.

CPU Role

The Core Ultra 7 165H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on Intel’s Meteor Lake architecture. Its hybrid design, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, is built for sustained multi-threaded workloads. The CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth provide ample data throughput for game logic and asset streaming.

In Fivem, the CPU’s role is secondary to the GPU, but it is not irrelevant. The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 262 FPS. This high frame rate at a CPU-intensive setting suggests the processor is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently. However, the performance ceiling at this setting is likely dictated by the CPU’s single-thread performance, which is reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1759. The processor’s percentile ranking of 84th vs all CPUs and its average benchmark score of 34083 place it competitively, but the data shows it is only 0.3% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H and 0.5% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X in average scores.

The architecture’s 7 nm process node and 28 W TDP suggest a focus on efficiency, which is typical for mobile parts. In this context, the CPU acts as a capable partner to the RTX 4090 Mobile. The data indicates that while the CPU can push high frame rates at lower resolutions, its influence wanes as resolution increases and the GPU becomes the bottleneck. For instance, moving from 1080p Low to 4K Low, the average FPS drops from 262 to 96, a 63% reduction that is primarily attributable to the GPU’s workload. The CPU’s 22 threads and high boost clock ensure it rarely becomes the limiting factor in Fivem, except perhaps in the most extreme low-resolution, high-FPS scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The data shows the Core Ultra 7 165H has an average benchmark score of 34083. This places it 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H (score 33989) and 0.4% behind the AMD EPYC 4244P (score 34220) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (score 34222). It is also 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, which scores 34260.

Q: What is the Fivem performance at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo achieves an average of 136 FPS, with a minimum of 116 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS. This represents a solid balance between visual fidelity and smooth gameplay, as the minimum frame rate stays well above typical display refresh rates.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 Mobile the primary performance limiter in Fivem?

A: The data strongly suggests yes. At 4K, the average FPS drops from 96 at Low settings to 47 at Ultra settings, a 51% decrease. This scaling is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU’s impact is more visible at 1080p, where Low settings hit 262 FPS, but this is still a high enough number to indicate the GPU is managing the load effectively.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 Mobile rank among other GPUs?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 43667 and sits in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. It is 0.8% faster than the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (score 43301) and 0.9% faster than both the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (score 43268) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (score 43262). It is 0.9% slower than the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (score 44075).

Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate gaming with this combo?

A: Based on the measured data, 1080p is the only resolution where the combo consistently exceeds 120 FPS across all settings. At High settings, it averages 165 FPS, and at Medium, it averages 207 FPS. At 1440p, only Low and Medium settings break the 120 FPS barrier, with averages of 172 and 136 FPS, respectively.

Q: Does the combo’s rank in Fivem reflect its overall hardware strength?

A: The combo ranks 826th out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem. This places it in the upper quartile, but not at the absolute top. Given the high percentile rankings of both the CPU (84th) and GPU (84th), the lower combo rank suggests that Fivem’s specific workload may not fully utilize the hardware’s potential, or that other combinations offer better optimization for this particular game.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound curve. At 1080p Low, the system produces 262 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 172 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 4K Low, the frame rate falls to 96 FPS, a further 44% reduction from 1440p. This pattern shows that the rendering load is expanding significantly with each resolution step.

At High settings, the scaling is similar but with lower absolute numbers. The system achieves 165 FPS at 1080p, 109 FPS at 1440p, and 60 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 34%, and from 1440p to 4K is 45%. This consistent percentage drop across settings indicates that the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU’s performance, while strong, is not the primary factor in these frame rate changes.

The data also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (262 FPS) and Ultra (128 FPS) is 134 FPS. At 1440p, the difference is 88 FPS (172 vs 84). At 4K, the difference narrows to 49 FPS (96 vs 47). This narrowing suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so heavily loaded that even lowering settings has diminishing returns on frame rate. The limiting component is unequivocally the GPU at 4K, while at 1080p, the CPU has more influence on the upper frame rate ceiling.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets.

At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. Low settings produce an average of 262 FPS. Medium settings yield 207 FPS, with a minimum of 176 and a maximum of 238 FPS. High settings deliver 165 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 128 FPS. This resolution is clearly where the combo excels, with all presets exceeding 120 FPS, making it suitable for high refresh rate monitors.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but requires more consideration. Low settings hit 172 FPS, and Medium settings achieve 136 FPS, with a minimum of 116 FPS, which ensures smooth gameplay. High settings average 109 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 84 FPS. The data shows that for a 144Hz display, Low or Medium settings would be the optimal choices.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limits become apparent. Low settings average 96 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high refresh rates. Medium settings drop to 75 FPS, with a minimum of 64 FPS, indicating potential stutter in demanding scenes. High settings average 60 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 47 FPS. At 4K, the data suggests that only Low settings provide a consistently smooth experience, while Medium settings are borderline.

The minimum and maximum FPS data for Medium settings across all resolutions shows a consistent variance. At 1080p, the range is 176-238 FPS. At 1440p, the range is 116-156 FPS. At 4K, the range is 64-87 FPS. This variance is typical for a multiplayer game like Fivem, where scene complexity can change rapidly.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile ranks 826th out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the combo in the top 22.3% of all tested systems. This ranking is notable because both components individually sit in the 84th percentile of their respective categories.

The data suggests that the combo’s rank is influenced by Fivem’s specific performance characteristics. The game’s engine and multiplayer nature may not fully utilize the CPU’s 22 threads or the GPU’s 9728 shading units. The combo’s rank is likely higher than many desktop systems but lower than the absolute best mobile or desktop configurations. The nearest rival GPUs, such as the NVIDIA RTX A6000, have similar average scores, but their performance in Fivem could differ due to driver optimizations or other factors.

The rank of 826 out of 3707 indicates that the hardware is well above average, but it is not a top-tier performer in this specific title. The data shows that while the RTX 4090 Mobile is a flagship part, its performance in Fivem at 4K Ultra (47 FPS) is not stellar, which may be dragging the combo’s rank down. The combo’s strength lies in its ability to maintain high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, which is where it likely outperforms many other combinations.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s resolution and refresh rate priority.

For 4K displays, the data shows that Low settings are the only viable option for consistent 60+ FPS gameplay, with an average of 96 FPS. Medium settings dip to an average of 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS, which could result in noticeable frame drops during intense scenes. High settings average exactly 60 FPS, but this leaves no headroom for fluctuations. Ultra settings are not recommended, as the 47 FPS average falls below the standard 60 FPS target.

For 1440p displays, Medium settings offer the best balance, with an average of 136 FPS and a minimum of 116 FPS. This ensures a smooth experience on 120Hz or 144Hz displays. Low settings push the average to 172 FPS, which is ideal for 165Hz monitors, but may sacrifice visual quality. High settings at 109 FPS are also playable, but the lower minimum frame rate (not recorded) could be a concern.

For 1080p displays, all settings are viable. Ultra settings average 128 FPS, which is sufficient for most high refresh rate displays. High settings at 165 FPS are excellent for 165Hz monitors. Medium settings at 207 FPS are perfect for 240Hz displays, and Low settings at 262 FPS will satisfy even the most demanding esports enthusiasts. The data suggests that 1080p Medium is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a high frame rate with a comfortable minimum of 176 FPS.

In summary, the combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p with Medium or High settings, where it delivers a high-performance experience. At 4K, users must compromise on settings to maintain playable frame rates.