Fivem

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the Intel Arc B390 produces a deeply unbalanced experience in Fivem, a multiplayer title that is heavily dependent on the graphics subsystem. The data shows a combination where a top-tier 20-core processor is shackled by an integrated-class GPU, resulting in frame rates that are mostly below the threshold for smooth, competitive play. This combination ranks in the 2656th position out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 12% of all configurations, which immediately signals that the graphics card is the primary bottleneck. The following analysis breaks down the measured performance across resolutions and settings, focusing on what the numbers indicate about the limiting component and the overall viability of this pairing.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a stark and predictable pattern: performance collapses as resolution increases, which is the classic signature of a GPU-bound system. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 88 FPS. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that approaches a playable frame rate for a multiplayer game, and even then, it is not particularly high. Moving to 2560x1440 at Low settings, the average drops to 58 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the average falls to 32 FPS, which is a 64% reduction from the 1080p Low result. This steep decline is far more aggressive than what would be expected from a balanced system, where the CPU would start to share more of the load at lower resolutions. Here, the GPU is saturated even at 1080p, and every additional pixel pushed at higher resolutions directly cuts into the frame rate.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings tells the same story. At 1920x1080 High, the average is 56 FPS. At 2560x1440 High, it drops to 37 FPS, and at 3840x2160 High, it plummets to 20 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is a 34% decrease, and from 1080p to 4K is a 64% decrease. These percentages are nearly identical to the Low settings scaling, which indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor regardless of the graphical preset. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a smaller FPS delta between resolutions, especially at lower settings where the CPU workload becomes relatively more significant. Instead, the consistent percentage drops across all settings confirm that the Intel Arc B390 is running at its maximum capacity even at the lowest resolution and settings.

The medium settings data provides additional insight, as it includes minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1920x1080 Medium, the average is 70 FPS, with a minimum of 59 and a maximum of 80. At 2560x1440 Medium, the average is 46 FPS, with a minimum of 39 and a maximum of 53. At 3840x2160 Medium, the average is 25 FPS, with a minimum of 22 and a maximum of 29. The frame time consistency, as indicated by the min-max spread, remains relatively tight at each resolution, suggesting that the GPU is delivering a steady, albeit low, stream of frames rather than stuttering. This is a sign of a fully saturated GPU, not a CPU that is causing hitches. The 1080p Medium average of 70 FPS is the second-highest result in the dataset, but it still falls short of the 88 FPS achieved at Low settings, showing that even modest graphical increases have a disproportionate impact on performance.

The Ultra settings are the most punishing. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average is 43 FPS. At 2560x1440 Ultra, it is 29 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Ultra, it is 16 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is essentially unplayable, and even the 1080p Ultra result is marginal for a multiplayer game where reaction time matters. The data strongly indicates that the resolution scaling is entirely dictated by the GPU's fill rate and compute capabilities. The Intel Core i7-14700K, with its high single-thread performance, is more than capable of feeding frames to a much faster graphics card. The bottleneck is unambiguous: the Arc B390 is a low-end integrated GPU that cannot keep up with the demands of Fivem at any resolution above 1080p Low.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this CPU-GPU pairing in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Low settings is the only configuration that delivers a playable average frame rate, hitting 88 FPS. All other settings at 1080p, and all settings at 1440p and 4K, fall below 70 FPS, with many results in the 20s and 30s.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1482, which places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, which scores 1463, a 1.3% difference. The Arc B390 is 1.5% ahead of the GeForce 800M and 2.5% ahead of the GeForce GT 625 OEM. These are all extremely low-end parts, confirming the Arc B390's weak performance class.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700K the reason for the low frame rates in Fivem?

A: No. The i7-14700K ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with a multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 33440.5 and a single-core score of 2160. The measured FPS scaling across resolutions shows a classic GPU bottleneck. The CPU is not the limiting factor; the Intel Arc B390 is.

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-14700K has an average benchmark score of 69355. It is virtually tied with the AMD EPYC 9115, which scores 69288, a 0.1% difference. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX. This places it in the top tier of processors, far more powerful than what the GPU can utilize.

Q: Does the Arc B390 have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. The memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," and the memory bandwidth is "System Dependent." This means the GPU relies on the system's main memory, which is a severe limitation for gaming performance, especially at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the overall rank of this combo in the database for Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2656th out of 3005 tested combinations. This places it in the bottom 12% of all configurations, indicating that it is one of the weaker setups for this game.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a powerhouse processor that is completely underutilized in this configuration. It features 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. This is a 14th-generation Raptor Lake part built on Intel's 10 nm process, and it supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 33440.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2160 in single-core, numbers that place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 69355 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, with a delta of just -0.2%. This is a CPU designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads, and its single-core performance is equally impressive, which is critical for games like Fivem that rely on a few fast cores.

However, in Fivem, the CPU's role is largely to prepare frames for the GPU. The measured FPS data shows that the i7-14700K is not the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 88 FPS, but at 1080p High, it drops to 56 FPS, and at 1080p Ultra, it falls to 43 FPS. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect these numbers to be much closer together, since the CPU workload does not change dramatically with graphics settings. The fact that the FPS drops significantly as settings increase proves that the GPU is the constraining component. The i7-14700K has enough raw processing power to handle Fivem's simulation and network code at frame rates far higher than what the Arc B390 can output.

The CPU's L3 cache is 33 MB shared, and it has a passmark single-thread score of 4472. These specifications are more than sufficient for a multiplayer title. The data also shows that the i7-14700K's nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are all within 1% of its performance, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. This indicates that the CPU is not a weak link in any sense. The problem is that the Arc B390's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482 is in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it is one of the slowest graphics processors available. The CPU is essentially waiting for the GPU to finish rendering each frame, which is why the frame rates are so low. In a balanced system, this CPU would be paired with a GPU that scores thousands of points higher in 3DMark, allowing it to stretch its legs.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2656 out of 3005 is a damning statistic. It places this configuration in the bottom 11.6% of all tested combinations for Fivem. This is not a mediocre ranking; it is a clear indication that the pairing is fundamentally flawed for this game. The data shows that the CPU is a top-tier part, but the GPU is not. The GPU's percentile rank of 9 means that 91% of all GPUs tested are faster than the Arc B390. The CPU's percentile rank of 94 means it is faster than 94% of all CPUs. The combination of a 94th percentile CPU with a 9th percentile GPU is the definition of a bottleneck.

For context, the i7-14700K's average benchmark score of 69355 is nearly 47 times higher than the Arc B390's average benchmark score of 1482. This massive disparity is reflected in the game's performance. The combo rank is not just about the hardware's theoretical capabilities, but also about how they work together in a real-world scenario. In Fivem, which is a multiplayer mod for Grand Theft Auto V, the game engine is known to be demanding on both the CPU and GPU, but in this case, the GPU is so weak that it cannot deliver playable frame rates at most settings. A more balanced pairing, such as this CPU with a mid-range dedicated GPU, would likely rank in the top 50% of all combos. The data strongly suggests that the Arc B390 is the sole reason for this low rank, as the CPU has proven itself to be among the best in the database.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the primary limiting factor in this configuration. It is an integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process. Its base clock is 300 MHz, and its boost clock is 2500 MHz, but these clocks are not enough to overcome its fundamental limitations. It has 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 60.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s, with a FP32 compute performance of 7.680 TFLOPS. These specifications are in the range of entry-level dedicated GPUs from several generations ago, but the critical flaw is its memory configuration.

The Arc B390 has "System Shared" memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. This is a severe handicap for gaming. The memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means it relies on the system's main memory bandwidth, which is shared with the CPU. In Fivem, which has large open-world textures and complex draw calls, the lack of dedicated VRAM is catastrophic. The GPU must constantly fetch data from system memory over the bus, which is much slower than a dedicated VRAM interface. This is reflected in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482, which places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, GeForce 800M, GT 625 OEM, and GT 710, all of which are ancient or ultra-low-end parts.

The measured FPS data confirms the GPU's role. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 88 FPS, which is the best case scenario. But the moment settings are increased to Medium, the average drops to 70 FPS. At High, it is 56 FPS, and at Ultra, it is 43 FPS. This trend shows that the GPU's shading and texture units are overwhelmed by even moderate graphical demands. At 1440p, the situation worsens, with Low at 58 FPS, Medium at 46 FPS, High at 37 FPS, and Ultra at 29 FPS. At 4K, the results are unplayable: Low at 32 FPS, Medium at 25 FPS, High at 20 FPS, and Ultra at 16 FPS. The GPU is simply not capable of driving Fivem at these resolutions. The TDP of 80 W and the "IGP" slot width confirm that this is an integrated solution, not a discrete card, and its performance is consistent with that classification. The data shows that the Arc B390 is the sole reason for the low frame rates, and no amount of CPU power can compensate for its lack of dedicated memory and raw throughput.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete set of measured frame rates for this combo in Fivem is as follows. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from a high of 88 at Low settings to a low of 43 at Ultra settings. Specifically, Low averages 88 FPS, Medium averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 and a maximum of 80, High averages 56 FPS, and Ultra averages 43 FPS. These are the only results that could be considered even remotely playable for a multiplayer game, and only the Low setting is truly smooth.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops significantly. Low settings average 58 FPS, Medium averages 46 FPS with a minimum of 39 and a maximum of 53, High averages 37 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. None of these results are ideal for competitive play, and the Ultra setting is clearly below the threshold for a responsive experience. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings is 30 FPS, which is a 34% reduction. This is a substantial hit that reinforces the GPU bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the performance is consistently poor. Low settings average 32 FPS, Medium averages 25 FPS with a minimum of 22 and a maximum of 29, High averages 20 FPS, and Ultra averages 16 FPS. The 4K results are all below 35 FPS, making the game effectively unplayable at this resolution. The scaling from 1080p Low to 4K Low is a drop from 88 to 32 FPS, a 64% reduction. This is a massive loss in performance that can only be attributed to the GPU's inability to handle the pixel count. The data shows that the only way to get a playable frame rate with this combo is to play at 1080p with Low settings, and even then, the headroom is minimal. The measured FPS breakdown is a clear indictment of the Arc B390's gaming capabilities, and it highlights the extreme imbalance of pairing it with the Intel Core i7-14700K.