Fivem

The Fivem benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-10400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 are based on measured data. The combination ranks 1252 out of 1792 tested configurations, placing it in the lower half of the field. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 14168, while the GPU scores 20258, with percentiles of 73 and 63 respectively. These figures provide a baseline for interpreting the game’s measured FPS across resolutions and settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average FPS is 161.6, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i5-10400F is 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7552 and 1.1% behind the Intel Core i5-8500, based on average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded?

A: The lowest average FPS is 29.3, recorded at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Q: What is the combo's rank in the game's benchmark database?

A: The combination ranks 1252 out of 1792 tested configurations.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 128-bit bus, and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 1720 MHz, with a boost clock of 2655 MHz and a game clock of 2250 MHz. These specifications are directly reflected in the measured FPS. At 1080p Low, the GPU sustains 161.6 FPS, while at 4K Ultra it drops to 29.3 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a notable factor for high-resolution textures; the 4K Ultra result of 29.3 FPS is the lowest in the dataset, suggesting that the memory subsystem is stressed at that configuration. The GPU's launch MSRP is 269 USD.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 16634 in Passmark G3D and 82501 in Geekbench OpenCL, with a percentile of 63 among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which is 0.6% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which is 1.3% ahead. The GPU’s compute capabilities, including 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and 43.50 TFLOPS FP16, are consistent with its mid-range positioning. The 8 GB memory size and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are typical for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results indicate that the GPU is the primary constraint at that resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS shows a clear downward trend as resolution increases. At High settings, the average FPS is 103.9 at 1080p, 63.8 at 1440p, and 34.8 at 4K. The 4K High result is less than half of the 1080p High result. At Low settings, the values are 161.6, 105.3, and 57.1 respectively, with the 4K result again less than half of the 1080p result. This pattern indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting component at higher resolutions, as the workload scales with pixel count. The 1440p results are closer to 1080p than to 4K, suggesting a moderate scaling factor between 1080p and 1440p, and a more severe drop from 1440p to 4K.

At 4K, even Low settings only achieve 57.1 FPS, which is the highest 4K result. Medium at 4K yields 47.8 FPS, while High and Ultra drop to 34.8 and 29.3 FPS respectively. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is less drastic: for example, at Medium settings, the FPS goes from 126.9 at 1080p to 83.2 at 1440p, a reduction of 43.7 FPS, but the 4K Medium result of 47.8 FPS is less than half of the 1440p value. This suggests that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute resources are increasingly taxed as resolution rises, with the 4K Ultra result of 29.3 FPS representing the most demanding scenario.

Measured FPS Breakdown

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | High | 34.8 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 57.1 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.8 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.3 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 63.8 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 105.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 83.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.4 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 103.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 161.6 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 126.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 77.1 |

The data is measured, not estimated. At 1080p, all settings exceed 77 FPS, with Low reaching 161.6 FPS. At 1440p, Low and Medium provide 105.3 and 83.2 FPS respectively, while High and Ultra fall to 63.8 and 48.4 FPS. At 4K, only Low achieves 57.1 FPS; Medium, High, and Ultra are all below 50 FPS, with Ultra at 29.3 FPS. The spread between settings is largest at 1080p, where the difference between Low and Ultra is 84.5 FPS, and narrowest at 4K, where the difference is 27.8 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal preset depends on the target resolution. At 1080p, Low provides the highest average at 161.6 FPS, but High still delivers 103.9 FPS, which is a strong balance. Ultra at 1080p yields 77.1 FPS, which is acceptable for many users. At 1440p, High achieves 63.8 FPS, while Low reaches 105.3 FPS; Medium at 83.2 FPS is a middle ground. At 4K, only Low reaches 57.1 FPS; Medium drops to 47.8 FPS, and High to 34.8 FPS. Therefore, for a smooth experience at 4K, Low is the only viable preset, while 1440p High and 1080p High offer good performance without sacrificing too much visual quality.

The 1080p Low average of 161.6 FPS is the highest measured, while the 4K Ultra average of 29.3 FPS is the lowest. The combo’s rank of 1252 out of 1792 indicates that a majority of tested configurations deliver higher average FPS, but the data shows that this pairing is capable of playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with appropriate settings. For users prioritizing frame rate, 1080p Low is the clear choice; for a balance of visual fidelity and performance, 1080p High or 1440p High are recommended. At 4K, the only setting that exceeds 50 FPS is Low, making it the sole practical option for that resolution.