Fivem

# Fivem with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — Benchmark Analysis

This combination of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16-core Zen 5 mobile processor) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (Ada Lovelace, 16 GB GDDR6X) ranks 941st out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 69th percentile of all system pairings. The data shows a configuration that delivers strong 1080p and 1440p performance, with 4K representing a more demanding scenario where the GPU's capabilities are pushed closer to their limits.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 941 out of 3005 tested combinations places this system in the upper third of all configurations tested for Fivem. This is a solid result, though not an elite one, indicating that while the hardware is capable, there are many faster pairings in the database. The ranking reflects a balance between the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU's substantial rasterization power.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (avg score 76513, 1.6% behind) and the Intel Core i9-14900K (avg score 79097, 1.7% ahead). This places the CPU in rarefied company, particularly for a mobile part, and its 16 cores and 32 threads with a 5.10 GHz boost clock provide ample computational headroom for Fivem's multi-player workloads.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 performs in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54247. Its closest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER (avg score 54209, 0.1% behind), while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB sits 2.6% ahead and the AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.7% ahead. This tight clustering indicates the RTX 4080 is surrounded by comparable performers, though the measured FPS in Fivem shows the GPU is rarely the limiting factor until 4K resolutions are reached.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 brings 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is substantial for Fivem, which in multiplayer scenarios can benefit from larger frame buffers when many player models, vehicles, and world details are loaded simultaneously. The GPU's base clock of 2205 MHz and boost clock of 2505 MHz, combined with 9728 shading units and 112 ROPs, deliver a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s.

In Fivem specifically, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1080p, the measured FPS ranges from 117 (Ultra) to 239 (Low), suggesting the GPU has significant headroom. At 1440p, the range narrows to 77–157 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 43–87 FPS. This progression shows the RTX 4080's raw compute (48.74 TFLOPS FP32) is more than adequate for lower resolutions, while the 4K Ultra setting at 43 FPS reveals the performance ceiling when both resolution and quality settings are maximized.

The GPU's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are present but do not appear to be heavily leveraged in Fivem, as the measured FPS data does not indicate ray tracing or DLSS-specific scenarios. The 16 GB frame buffer, however, ensures that even at 4K Ultra with heavy multiplayer activity, memory capacity is unlikely to be a bottleneck.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling across resolutions. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS drops from 151 to 99, a 34% reduction. From 1440p to 4K at High settings, the average drops from 99 to 55, a further 44% reduction. This accelerating decline indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly the limiting component as pixel count rises.

At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced: 239 FPS at 1080p drops to 157 FPS at 1440p (34% reduction) and then to 87 FPS at 4K (45% reduction). The fact that 4K Low still achieves 87 FPS suggests that even at minimum quality, the pixel throughput demand at 4K begins to strain the RTX 4080, though it remains playable.

Medium settings show a similar trajectory: 189 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p, and 69 FPS at 4K. The min/max values for Medium settings (160–217 at 1080p, 106–143 at 1440p, 59–79 at 4K) indicate frame time consistency degrades with resolution, with the 4K minimum of 59 FPS approaching the threshold where stutter becomes noticeable.

Ultra settings demonstrate the steepest drop-off: 117 FPS at 1080p, 77 FPS at 1440p, and 43 FPS at 4K. This represents a 63% reduction from 1080p to 4K, confirming that the combination of maximum quality and 4K resolution exceeds what this GPU can sustain at high frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. Low settings achieve an average of 239 FPS, which is well beyond what most displays can refresh, indicating CPU-bound performance at this point. Medium settings average 189 FPS with a range of 160–217 FPS, while High settings average 151 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 117 FPS, still a very playable figure for competitive multiplayer.

At 2560x1440, performance remains robust. Low settings produce 157 FPS average, Medium settings achieve 124 FPS (range 106–143), and High settings deliver 99 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 77 FPS, which is at the threshold where high-refresh-rate displays (144 Hz and above) can no longer be fully utilized.

At 3840x2160, the system becomes more constrained. Low settings still manage 87 FPS, which is playable, but Medium settings drop to 69 FPS (range 59–79), High settings fall to 55 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 43 FPS. The 4K Medium setting's minimum of 59 FPS is the only sub-60 FPS minimum recorded across all tested configurations, highlighting the performance pressure at this resolution.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination capable of 60 FPS at 4K in Fivem?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings (87 FPS) or Medium settings (69 FPS average, 59 FPS minimum). High settings average 55 FPS, and Ultra settings average 43 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740, placing it 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76513) and 1.6% ahead of the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76492), but 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K (79097) and 2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (76212).

Q: What is the best resolution for competitive play?

A: At 1080p, all settings exceed 100 FPS, with Low and Medium settings reaching 239 FPS and 189 FPS respectively. This makes 1080p the clear choice for maximum frame rates, with 1440p Low (157 FPS) also viable for high-refresh displays.

Q: Does the GPU perform better than its direct competitor?

A: The RTX 4080's average benchmark score of 54247 is 0.1% ahead of the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209) and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828, which is 1.1% ahead of the 4080), but 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698) and 2.7% behind the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757).

Q: What frame rates can I expect with V-Sync at 1440p?

A: At 1440p High settings, the average FPS is 99, which is below a 144 Hz refresh rate. Medium settings average 124 FPS (maximum 143), so a 120 Hz display would be more appropriate, while Low settings at 157 FPS could support a 144 Hz display.

Q: Is the 16 GB VRAM sufficient for Fivem at 4K?

A: The measured FPS data shows no evidence of VRAM-related stuttering or performance degradation at 4K, even at Ultra settings (43 FPS average). The 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB capacity appear adequate for Fivem's multiplayer workloads.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gameplay, the data shows that Medium settings offer the best balance of performance and visual quality, with an average of 189 FPS and a minimum of 160 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above 144 Hz refresh rates while maintaining higher visual fidelity than Low settings. High settings at 151 FPS are also viable for 144 Hz displays, though the margin is thinner. Ultra settings at 117 FPS are acceptable for 60–120 Hz displays but sacrifice significant frame rate for marginal visual gains.

At 1440p, Medium settings (124 FPS average, 106 FPS minimum) are the recommended choice for high-refresh displays, as they maintain frame rates above 100 FPS while offering better visuals than Low settings. High settings at 99 FPS are suitable for 60 Hz or 100 Hz displays, while Ultra at 77 FPS is playable but not ideal for competitive scenarios. Low settings at 157 FPS support 144 Hz displays but with reduced visual quality.

At 4K, Medium settings (69 FPS average, 59 FPS minimum) provide the only configuration that stays close to 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for this resolution. Low settings at 87 FPS offer a smoother experience but with significant visual compromises. High settings (55 FPS) and Ultra settings (43 FPS) are not recommended for 4K if frame rate consistency is a priority, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

The data indicates that this system is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p with Medium or High settings, where it delivers frame rates well above playable thresholds. For 4K, users should accept Medium settings as the practical ceiling for consistent performance.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Strix Halo) built on TSMC's 4 nm process. With a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, it offers substantial single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2044, Geekbench single-core of 2464) alongside exceptional multi-threaded capability (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 35314, Geekbench multi-core of 20992).

In Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification that can involve dozens of connected players, the CPU's thread handling is critical. The 32 threads allow for efficient distribution of game logic, network processing, and entity updates, which is reflected in the high frame rates at 1080p Low (239 FPS) where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The L3 cache of 64 MB shared across all cores, combined with 1 MB L2 per core and 80 KB L1 per core, provides ample on-die storage for frequently accessed game data.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s via quad-channel LPDDR5X is notable for a mobile processor and helps maintain consistent frame delivery in scenarios with many simultaneous entities. The PassMark multi-thread score of 54934 and physics score of 3481 further indicate strong computational throughput, though Fivem's performance at higher resolutions shows that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as pixel count increases.

The CPU's position in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with rivals like the Intel Core i9-14900K only 1.7% ahead in average score, confirms that this mobile processor provides desktop-class performance. The 55 W TDP is impressively low for this level of capability, though the system's overall performance in Fivem is ultimately constrained more by the GPU at 1440p and above than by the CPU.