Undisputed

This page breaks down measured performance data for Undisputed, a Sports title released on 10 October 2023, running on a pairing of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 graphics card. All frame-rate figures below come from measured benchmark rows — not estimates — covering three resolutions and four quality presets, and the analysis walks through how each component's characteristics map onto those results.

CPU Role

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process under the Strix Halo codename. It runs a 3.00 GHz base clock with boost up to 5.10 GHz, and its cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core plus a shared 64 MB L3 block. It sits in the Mobile market segment, uses Socket FP11, and carries a 55 W TDP — a notably low figure for a chip with this many cores, which reflects its platform positioning rather than any gaming-specific tuning.

Benchmark results indicate this is a top-tier CPU overall: the data places it in the 95th percentile against all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 77740. Its nearest rivals confirm that standing. The Intel Core i9-14900K scores 79097 on average, only 1.7 percent ahead; the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 in turn leads the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX by 2 percent, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 1.6 percent, and the EPYC Embedded 8224P by 1.6 percent. In other words, the CPU is statistically indistinguishable from desktop flagship silicon in aggregate throughput.

For Undisputed specifically, the single-thread numbers matter most, because Sports titles are typically driven by frame pacing and simulation logic rather than heavy multi-core workloads. Here the chip posts 316 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 2044 in R23 single-core, 2464 in Geekbench single-core, and 4147 in PassMark single-thread. Its multi-core results — 35314 in Cinebench R23 and 20992 in Geekbench — show the breadth of headroom, but the data suggests the game rarely needs it: frame rates at 1920x1080 reach 344 FPS on Low, a level at which CPU-side limits rather than GPU limits usually cap throughput. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory support with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth also helps keep frame delivery consistent at those high refresh rates.

GPU Role

The RTX 4080 is an Ada Lovelace card built on the AD103 chip at 5 nm, with 45,900 million transistors packed into a 379 mm² die — a density of 121.1M per mm². It carries 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores, with clocks of 2205 MHz base and 2505 MHz boost. The 16 GB of GDDR6X sits on a 256-bit bus delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth, running at 22.4 Gbps effective. Raw throughput figures include 48.74 TFLOPS FP32, a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s. It is a triple-slot card drawing 320 W through a single 16-pin connector, with a 700 W suggested PSU.

The data places this GPU in the 86th percentile against all tested graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 54247. Its closest rival by aggregate score is the RTX 4080 SUPER at 54209 — a gap of just 0.1 percent — while the Radeon 8060S sits 2.7 percent behind, the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB trails by 2.6 percent, and the Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1 percent back. Synthetic results back this up: 6567 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 34457 in PassMark G3D, and 263779 in Geekbench Vulkan.

For Undisputed, the relevant numbers are the DirectX results — PassMark DirectX 11 at 314 and DirectX 12 at 132 — since the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4. The measured 4K Ultra result of 60 FPS average is where the card's rendering throughput, not the CPU, becomes the defining constraint. The 16 GB VRAM buffer is more than sufficient at every tested resolution and preset in this dataset.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling data tells a clear story about which component limits each configuration. From 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 at High settings, average FPS falls from 205 to 94 — a steep drop that indicates heavy GPU dependency as pixel count quadruples. The same pattern holds at every preset: Low falls from 344 to 157, Medium from 247 to 113, and Ultra from 132 to 60.

The frame-rate ceiling at 1080p is the most telling data point. A 344 FPS Low result combined with a CPU in the 95th percentile suggests the processor can feed frames at very high rates, but the diminishing returns between presets at that resolution — 344 down to 132 from Low to Ultra — show that even at 1080p the GPU is doing the heavy lifting once quality settings rise. At 4K the picture inverts: with roughly half the 1080p frame rate at every preset, the RTX 4080 is unquestionably the limiting component, and the CPU's considerable multi-thread headroom goes unused. The Medium row at 4K, with a minimum of 96 and maximum of 130 FPS around the 113 average, indicates tight frame delivery — a narrow spread that points to consistent, stutter-free output rather than erratic dips.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured averages are 344 FPS on Low, 247 on Medium (with a 210 minimum and 284 maximum recorded), 205 on High, and 132 on Ultra. Every one of these clears common high-refresh thresholds; even Ultra sits well above 120 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the averages drop to 248 on Low, 179 on Medium (minimum 152, maximum 206), 148 on High, and 95 on Ultra. The High preset's 148 FPS average keeps this configuration comfortably in high-refresh territory at 1440p, and even the Ultra result remains above 90 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 157 on Low, 113 on Medium (minimum 96, maximum 130), 94 on High, and 60 on Ultra. The High preset lands just under the 4K/96-and-above band that Medium achieves, meaning the step from Medium to High costs 19 FPS at this resolution, while the step from High to Ultra costs another 34. Minimum/maximum data was captured only for the Medium rows at each resolution, so the spread analysis above rests on those three rows: a 74-FPS band at 1080p, 54 at 1440p, and 34 at 4K — progressively tighter as resolution climbs and the GPU becomes the consistent bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the Undisputed results database, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 plus RTX 4080 pairing ranks 1220 out of 3718 tested combinations. That places it in the top third of tested hardware pairings for this game. The rank reflects the balance of the two components: a CPU that trades blows with the i9-14900K (within 1.7 percent) paired with a GPU that is effectively identical in aggregate score to the RTX 4080 SUPER (0.1 percent apart). Neither component is the weak link in isolation; the ranking instead reflects how many stronger GPU pairings exist in the pool, since Undisputed's GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions rewards cards above the 86th percentile more than it rewards additional CPU throughput.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows support a straightforward ladder of choices. At 1920x1080, High is the sensible default: 205 FPS average with clear headroom above the refresh rates most displays offer, and no need to drop to Low unless competitive-level frame rates above 300 are the goal. At 2560x1440, High again delivers the best balance at 148 FPS average, keeping the experience in high-refresh range while retaining visual fidelity; Ultra at 95 FPS is viable but sacrifices roughly a third of the frame rate. At 3840x2160, Medium is the recommended preset — 113 FPS average with a 96 FPS minimum recorded — because it keeps frame delivery above 90 even at the floor, whereas High (94 average) and Ultra (60 average) give up significant smoothness for a modest visual step up. In short: High at 1080p and 1440p, Medium at 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Undisputed at 4K above 60 FPS? A: Yes. At 3840x2160 the measured averages are 157 FPS on Low, 113 on Medium, and 94 on High; only the Ultra preset sits right at 60 FPS.

Q: How much performance is lost going from 1440p to 4K? A: At High settings the average falls from 148 FPS to 94, and at Medium from 179 to 113. The drop indicates the RTX 4080 becomes the limiting component at 4K.

Q: Is the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 fast enough for high-refresh play at 1080p? A: The data suggests yes. It ranks in the 95th percentile among tested CPUs, sits within 1.7 percent of the Intel Core i9-14900K's average score, and the combo measured 344 FPS on Low and 247 on Medium at 1920x1080.

Q: Where does this pairing rank among tested Undisputed configurations? A: It ranks 1220 out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the top third.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 have enough VRAM for this game? A: The card carries 16 GB of GDDR6X, and the measured results show no VRAM-driven limitation at any tested resolution or preset.

Q: Which preset gives the most consistent frame delivery at 4K? A: Medium, with a recorded spread of 96 minimum to 130 maximum around a 113 FPS average — the tightest band relative to its average among the measured rows.