Fivem

This combo pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, a 12-core Zen 4 processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock, and a 16 GB RDNA 2 graphics card with a 2250 MHz boost clock. For Fivem, the benchmark data shows this pairing ranks 615th out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the upper third of all configurations. That ranking is not a top-tier result, but it reflects a system with substantial headroom across most settings, as the measured FPS data reveals a wide performance envelope from 45.1 fps at 4K Ultra up to 243.1 fps at 1080p Low.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 615 out of 1792 tested configurations puts it comfortably above the median, but it is not among the elite performers in this database. This position suggests a balanced system where neither the CPU nor GPU becomes a severe bottleneck in Fivem, but where the highest framerates at 4K Ultra are still out of reach. The data shows that the ranking is driven by the GPU’s ability to scale with resolution, while the CPU provides enough single-thread headroom to avoid limiting lower-resolution performance. At 1080p, this combo outperforms many higher-ranked systems because the Ryzen 9 7900X’s strong single-core score of 1093 in 3dmark_single_thread and 4238 in passmark_single_thread keeps frame pacing consistent. However, at 4K Ultra, the 45.1 fps average drags the overall rank down, as the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are taxed heavily by Fivem’s draw distances and asset streaming.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is the primary driver of Fivem’s visual output, and its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity is more than sufficient for Fivem’s large open-world assets, as the game does not typically exceed 8 GB at 1080p, even on Ultra. The GPU’s base clock of 1825 MHz and boost clock of 2250 MHz, with a game clock of 2015 MHz, allow it to maintain high utilization across all tested settings. In 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, the GPU scores 3689, which is a moderate result, but its passmark_g3d score of 24980 and passmark_directx_12 score of 100 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance, which Fivem leverages for its modern rendering pipeline. The GPU’s 72 ray accelerators and 4608 shading units provide ample compute throughput, though Fivem’s multiplayer servers often introduce CPU-bound scenarios that limit GPU usage. At 4K Ultra, the 45.1 fps average shows the GPU is at its limit, while at 1080p Low, the 243.1 fps figure demonstrates that the GPU is not the primary constraint at lower settings.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 9 7900X brings 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost of 5.60 GHz, built on the Zen 4 architecture. For Fivem, a game that is heavily dependent on single-thread performance for server-side scripting and entity updates, this CPU is a strong asset. Its 3dmark_single_thread score of 1093 and passmark_single_thread score of 4238 place it in the top percentile for desktop processors, which translates to stable frame pacing in busy multiplayer lobbies. The CPU’s 64 MB of shared L3 cache helps with asset streaming, and its DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth reduces latency spikes when many players are on screen. In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU scores 12536 in 3dmark_max_threads and 43695 in cinebench_r23_multicore, but Fivem rarely uses all 24 threads, so the real benefit is the high boost clock on a few cores. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the 243.1 fps average is likely limited by the CPU’s single-core speed, not the GPU, which is why the combo ranks higher at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combo scales across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the average framerates are 243.1 fps on Low, 191.9 fps on Medium, 153.3 fps on High, and 117.4 fps on Ultra. This is a strong spread, with the Low setting delivering over double the Ultra performance, indicating that Fivem’s visual effects and shadows are the primary GPU load. At 2560x1440, the averages drop to 157.2 fps on Low, 128 fps on Medium, 98.9 fps on High, and 78 fps on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is about 35% on Low and 33% on Ultra, which is consistent with the GPU’s bandwidth limitations at higher pixel counts. At 3840x2160, the averages fall to 88 fps on Low, 68 fps on Medium, 52.9 fps on High, and 45.1 fps on Ultra. The 4K Ultra figure is below the 60 fps threshold, making it unsuitable for smooth play, while 4K Low at 88 fps is playable but visually sparse. The 1440p Medium setting at 128 fps is the sweet spot for competitive play, while 1080p High at 153.3 fps offers a good balance for most users.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: The data shows 4K Ultra averages 45.1 fps, which is below the 60 fps standard, but 4K Low averages 88 fps, making it playable if you accept reduced visual quality.

Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate monitors?

A: At 1080p, the combo delivers 243.1 fps on Low and 153.3 fps on High, which supports 144Hz and 240Hz displays. At 1440p, Medium averages 128 fps, which is also viable for high refresh.

Q: How does the CPU affect Fivem’s performance?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X’s single-thread score of 4238 in passmark_single_thread and 1093 in 3dmark_single_thread ensures that CPU-bound scenarios, like dense player servers, do not drag down frame rates, especially at 1080p Low where the CPU is the limiting factor.

Q: Does the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM matter for Fivem?

A: The 16 GB capacity is more than enough for Fivem, as the game’s assets rarely exceed 8 GB, but the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is more critical for maintaining consistent streaming at 4K.

Q: What is the framerate drop from 1080p to 4K at the same settings?

A: On Low, the average drops from 243.1 fps at 1080p to 88 fps at 4K, a reduction of about 64%. On Ultra, it drops from 117.4 fps to 45.1 fps, a reduction of about 62%.

Q: Is the combo better suited for competitive or cinematic play?

A: The data suggests competitive play is the strength, with 1080p Low at 243.1 fps and 1440p Medium at 128 fps, while 4K Ultra at 45.1 fps is not ideal for cinematic experiences due to the sub-60 fps average.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the best experience depends on your display and priorities. For 1080p users with a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor, the High preset at 153.3 fps is the optimal choice—it provides a significant visual upgrade over Low’s 243.1 fps while remaining well above the refresh rate threshold. If you have a 1440p monitor, the Medium preset at 128 fps is the sweet spot, as it stays above 120 fps and looks better than Low’s 157.2 fps without the 22% performance hit of High’s 98.9 fps. For 4K displays, the Low preset at 88 fps is the only option that maintains smoothness, as Medium drops to 68 fps and High falls to 52.9 fps, both of which are borderline for fast-paced multiplayer. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution—at 1080p it delivers 117.4 fps, which is playable, but the visual difference over High is minimal compared to the 23% performance loss. For the most consistent competitive experience, 1440p Medium offers the best balance of clarity and speed, while 1080p High is the default recommendation for most users who want a polished look without sacrificing frame rate.