Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER delivers a performance profile in Fivem that is heavily dictated by resolution and graphics settings. The measured data reveals a system where the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong multi-threaded capabilities keep frame rates competitive at lower settings. This combo ranks in the 58th percentile of tested configurations for this game, indicating a mid-pack standing that benefits from specific settings adjustments.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is stark and clearly demonstrates the GPU’s workload scaling. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 111 FPS at 1920x1080 to 73 FPS at 2560x1440, a 34% reduction, and then further down to 40 FPS at 3840x2160, a 64% drop from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high throughput at 4K with demanding presets.

The scaling pattern changes with lower settings. At Low settings, the 1080p result is 175 FPS, which drops to 116 FPS at 1440p (a 34% decrease) and then to 64 FPS at 4K (a 63% decrease from 1080p). While the relative drop percentages are similar, the absolute frame rates remain higher, suggesting that the CPU is less of a bottleneck at lower graphical loads. The data indicates that at 4K, even with Low settings, the GPU is the limiting component, as the 64 FPS result is still significantly below the 175 FPS achievable at 1080p.

The Medium settings row provides additional insight, with min and max FPS values recorded. At 1080p Medium, the average is 138 FPS with a range of 118 to 159 FPS, while at 1440p Medium it averages 91 FPS (77-105 FPS), and at 4K Medium it averages 51 FPS (43-58 FPS). The consistent downward progression across all presets confirms that the scaling bottleneck is the GPU’s pixel throughput and memory bandwidth, not the CPU’s processing power.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its benchmark scores are robust; the Passmark single-thread score is 4691, and the multithread score is 36470, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. In Fivem, which is a multiplayer game that can be sensitive to CPU performance, these results indicate the processor is rarely the limiting factor at lower resolutions.

Data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the combo reaches 175 FPS, which is a high frame rate that suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently. However, the CPU’s role becomes more evident when comparing the 1080p and 1440p results at the same settings. For example, at High settings, the drop from 111 FPS at 1080p to 73 FPS at 1440p is a 34% reduction, which is less than the 64% drop seen going from 1440p to 4K. This indicates that at 1080p, the CPU can still push frames, but the GPU starts to struggle as resolution increases.

The nearest rivals for this CPU include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (avg score 69875, delta 0.2%), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (avg score 70163, delta -0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (avg score 69515, delta 0.7%). These scores are all within 1% of the 9700F’s average benchmark score of 69996, meaning the CPU’s performance in synthetic tests is essentially on par with those high-end parts. In Fivem, this translates to a processor that does not create a significant bottleneck, even at 175 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this combo in Fivem?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 175, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 31, which is the lowest recorded result in the data set.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance at 1440p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at 1440p, as the average FPS drops from 116 at Low to 57 at Ultra, a 51% reduction, while the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4691 would not cause such a dramatic shift.

Q: What is the FPS range at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The average FPS is 138, with a minimum of 118 and a maximum of 159 FPS, showing a stable performance window.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69996, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875) and 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515), but 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163).

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded at 4K resolution?

A: The lowest average FPS at 4K is 31, which occurs with Ultra settings, while the highest at 4K is 64 with Low settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 2138 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 58th percentile of all configurations. This is a mid-pack result, indicating that while the combo is capable of playable frame rates, it is not among the top performers. The ranking reflects the GPU’s age and its 8 GB memory capacity, which limits performance at high resolutions and settings.

Relative to other combos, this position is likely influenced by the RTX 2070 SUPER’s Passmark G3D score of 18169, which places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (avg score 20480, delta -1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (avg score 20534, delta -1.2%), and the Intel Arc B570 (avg score 20556, delta -1.3%). These deltas show the RTX 2070 SUPER is slightly below these parts in synthetic benchmarks, which correlates with its mid-pack ranking in Fivem.

The CPU’s high percentile (94th) does not boost the combo’s ranking significantly, suggesting that Fivem’s performance is more dependent on the GPU. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 175 FPS, which is high, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 31 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU’s limitations cap the overall experience.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is based on the Turing architecture with a TU104 chip, featuring 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Its base clock is 1605 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, and it has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score is 18169, and its percentile vs all GPUs is 65, indicating it is a mid-range performer in the current landscape.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role is critical at higher resolutions. The data shows that at 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is a 33 FPS swing (64 FPS vs 31 FPS), which is a 52% performance loss. This highlights the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth constraints. At 1080p, the same settings swing is 89 FPS (175 to 86), a 51% loss, showing that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck even at lower resolutions, though the absolute frame rates are more acceptable.

The GPU’s 8 GB memory size is a notable factor. While the data does not list VRAM usage, the performance drop at 4K Ultra to 31 FPS suggests that memory capacity or bandwidth is insufficient for the highest texture loads. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 9.062 TFLOPS, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K, as evidenced by the 40 FPS average at High settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.

At 1920x1080:

• Low: 175 FPS average
• Medium: 138 FPS average (118 min, 159 max)
• High: 111 FPS average
• Ultra: 86 FPS average

At 2560x1440:

• Low: 116 FPS average
• Medium: 91 FPS average (77 min, 105 max)
• High: 73 FPS average
• Ultra: 57 FPS average

At 3840x2160:

• Low: 64 FPS average
• Medium: 51 FPS average (43 min, 58 max)
• High: 40 FPS average
• Ultra: 31 FPS average

The 1080p results show a clear progression from 175 FPS at Low to 86 FPS at Ultra, with the Medium preset offering a balanced 138 FPS. The 1440p results drop by approximately 34% at each preset compared to 1080p, indicating consistent scaling. The 4K results are the most demanding, with only the Low preset achieving over 60 FPS, and the Ultra preset falling to 31 FPS, which is borderline playable.

The min and max FPS data for Medium settings shows stability; at 1080p, the range is 118-159 FPS, at 1440p it is 77-105 FPS, and at 4K it is 43-58 FPS. This indicates that the frame time variance increases with resolution, but the average remains consistent with the expected scaling.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience depends on the target resolution. For 1080p gaming, the Medium preset is recommended as it provides an average of 138 FPS with a minimum of 118 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay without the 49 FPS penalty of Ultra settings. The High preset at 111 FPS is also viable, but Medium offers a better balance of visual quality and performance.

For 1440p, the Low preset delivers 116 FPS, which is the only setting to exceed 100 FPS at this resolution. The Medium preset at 91 FPS is a strong alternative, as its minimum of 77 FPS keeps gameplay fluid, while the High preset at 73 FPS is acceptable but may show dips in demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 57 FPS is not recommended for competitive play.

At 4K, the data shows that only the Low preset achieves a playable 64 FPS average. The Medium preset at 51 FPS is still playable for less demanding users, but the High and Ultra presets at 40 and 31 FPS, respectively, are likely to cause noticeable stuttering and should be avoided. For the best experience, users should prioritize the Low or Medium presets at 4K to maintain frame rates above 50 FPS.

Overall, the Medium preset is the sweet spot for this combo at 1080p and 1440p, offering the best compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate. At 4K, users must accept lower settings to achieve a smooth experience.