Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 38 | 48 | 60 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 69 | 86 | 109 |
| 1080p Full HD | 81 | 104 | 131 | 166 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis
# Fivem with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT delivers a playable Fivem experience across most settings and resolutions, with the data showing a clear progression from 30 FPS at 4K Ultra to 166 FPS at 1080p Low. This combination ranks in the 36th percentile of tested combos for Fivem, indicating that while it is not at the top of the performance hierarchy, it offers substantial headroom for competitive or high-refresh-rate play at lower resolutions. The measured results show that the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM, create a balanced system where the limiting factor shifts depending on the resolution and quality preset selected.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) architecture using a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz provide the raw single-thread performance that Fivem, a multiplayer modification platform, can leverage for game logic, physics, and player state updates. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4691 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, suggesting that Fivem's frequently single-threaded server-client interactions benefit from this processor's high clock speeds.
The 8-core, 16-thread configuration is significant for Fivem because multiplayer environments often involve numerous concurrent entities — vehicles, players, and world objects — that can distribute across multiple threads. The Ryzen 7 9700F's PassMark multithread score of 36470 reflects this parallel capability, and its nearest rival comparison shows the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX at 0.2% higher average score (69875 vs 69996), while the Intel Core i7-14700KF sits 0.2% lower. This places the 9700F in a tight performance cluster with those processors, meaning Fivem's CPU-bound scenarios will likely perform similarly to these alternatives.
The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 cache per core help reduce memory latency when accessing frequently used game data, which is critical in Fivem's open-world multiplayer context where asset streaming and entity updates occur constantly. The DDR5 memory support with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the processor can feed data to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. However, at lower resolutions like 1080p, the data shows Fivem can be more CPU-sensitive; the jump from 104 FPS at High to 166 FPS at Low (a 60% improvement) indicates that when GPU load decreases, the CPU's ability to process frames becomes the more dominant factor, and the 9700F's strong single-thread performance (4691 PassMark) supports this.
FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data
Q: What is the best resolution to use if I want to maintain at least 60 FPS in Fivem with this combo?
A: The measured data shows that at 4K Low settings, the average FPS is 60, and at 1440p High settings, the average FPS is 69. For a consistent 60 FPS floor, 1440p High is the safest choice, as it provides 69 FPS with more visual quality than the 4K Low preset.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its closest rivals in overall CPU benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700F's average benchmark score is 69996, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875), 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF (70163), and 0.7% and 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (69515) and Intel Core i7-14700K (69355), respectively. This indicates it sits in the middle of a very tight performance band.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the average FPS drops from 166 on Low to 81 on Ultra, representing a 51% reduction in frame rate. The Medium preset delivers 131 FPS, and High delivers 104 FPS, showing a smooth progression of performance degradation as quality increases.
Q: Does the combo rank well among tested configurations for Fivem?
A: The combo rank is 1917 out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the 36th percentile. This means roughly two-thirds of tested configurations outperform it, but it is not in the bottom tier either, suggesting it is a mid-range performer for this game.
Q: Is the RX 6650 XT's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in Fivem?
A: The measured data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is only 30, while at 4K High it is 38, and at 4K Medium it is 48. These results suggest the GPU is heavily stressed at 4K, and the 8 GB VRAM may be a limiting factor, as the performance drops are substantial from 1440p to 4K.
Q: What settings should I use at 1440p to get close to 100 FPS?
A: The data shows that 1440p Low delivers 109 FPS, while 1440p Medium delivers 86 FPS. To get close to 100 FPS, Low is the only preset that exceeds that threshold, but Medium at 86 FPS may be acceptable for many players seeking a balance between visual quality and performance.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
The measured FPS data reveals a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate across all three resolutions. At 1080p, the High preset delivers 104 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while Ultra drops to 81 FPS — still playable but with diminishing returns on visual quality for a 22% performance hit. The Medium preset at 131 FPS offers the best balance of quality and speed at 1080p, providing 27% more FPS than High while maintaining acceptable visual detail. For players with 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, the Low preset at 166 FPS is the only option that fully utilizes such displays, but the visual sacrifices may be substantial.
At 1440p, the High preset at 69 FPS is the recommended choice for most users, as it stays above 60 FPS while offering good visual quality. The Medium preset at 86 FPS provides a 25% FPS boost over High with only a moderate reduction in quality, making it the optimal choice for those prioritizing smoothness. The Ultra preset at 53 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold, which may introduce noticeable stutter in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. The Low preset at 109 FPS is ideal for competitive play, but the lower quality settings may impair visibility of distant objects or player models.
At 4K, no preset achieves a comfortable 60 FPS except Low, which hits exactly 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 48 FPS and High at 38 FPS are playable on slower-paced content but will struggle in busy multiplayer lobbies. The Ultra preset at 30 FPS is only suitable for screenshots or cinematic viewing, not active gameplay. Given the data, the best overall experience for this combo is 1440p Medium at 86 FPS, which balances visual quality, frame rate, and consistency (min 73 FPS, max 99 FPS) across all measured scenarios.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT achieves a rank of 1917 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 36th percentile of all configurations. This means that 1088 tested combos perform worse, while 1917 perform better, indicating that this pairing is below the median performance level for the game. The rank suggests that while the CPU is strong (94th percentile among all CPUs) and the GPU is mid-range (65th percentile among all GPUs), the overall system performance in Fivem is constrained by the GPU's capabilities, particularly at higher resolutions and quality settings.
The CPU's benchmark position relative to rivals — with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX 0.2% higher, the Intel Core i7-14700KF 0.2% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 0.7% higher — indicates that the processor is not the primary bottleneck in this system. Instead, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17166, which places it at the 65th percentile, is more likely the limiting factor, especially at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA Tesla K40m (0.6% lower) and AMD FirePro W7000 (0.7% lower), are professional workstation cards, which highlights the RX 6650 XT's position as an entry-level to mid-range gaming GPU.
In practical terms, the 36th percentile rank means that for Fivem, this combo will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings, but it will not compete with high-end systems that rank in the 90th percentile or above. The data shows that the system's performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, and the rank reflects a configuration that is suitable for mainstream gaming but not for maximum fidelity or extreme refresh rates.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound system. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 104 at 1080p to 69 at 1440p (a 34% reduction) and then to 38 at 4K (a 63% reduction from 1440p). This steep decline at 4K indicates that the RX 6650 XT's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus (280.3 GB/s bandwidth) are insufficient to maintain frame rates at that resolution, with the GPU becoming the dominant bottleneck.
At Low settings, the pattern is similar but less severe: 166 FPS at 1080p, 109 FPS at 1440p (34% drop), and 60 FPS at 4K (45% drop from 1440p). The fact that even Low settings cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K suggests that the GPU's raw compute power (10.79 TFLOPS FP32) is the limiting factor, rather than VRAM capacity alone. At Medium settings, the data shows 131 FPS at 1080p, 86 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K, with the 1440p to 4K drop being 44%, which is proportionally similar to the Low preset.
The resolution scaling from 1080p to 1440p is relatively consistent across all settings, with approximately 34-35% FPS reduction, which aligns with the increase in pixel count (from 2.07 million to 3.69 million pixels, a 78% increase). However, the 1440p to 4K transition (from 3.69 million to 8.29 million pixels, a 125% increase) results in larger FPS drops of 44-45% for Low and Medium, but 45% for High, suggesting that the GPU's memory bandwidth and texture fill rate (337.3 GTexel/s) are overwhelmed at 4K. The CPU's performance at 1080p, where FPS exceeds 100 at High settings, indicates that the Ryzen 7 9700F has sufficient headroom to support higher frame rates, and the system is not CPU-limited until perhaps beyond 166 FPS at 1080p Low.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
At 1920x1080, the measured average FPS values are as follows: Low delivers 166 FPS, Medium delivers 131 FPS with a minimum of 111 FPS and maximum of 150 FPS, High delivers 104 FPS, and Ultra delivers 81 FPS. The Medium preset's min-max range of 111-150 FPS indicates some frame time variance, but the average remains well above the 60 FPS threshold. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 51% reduction in FPS (166 to 81), which is significant but expected given the increased graphical load. At 1080p, all presets are playable, with even Ultra maintaining 81 FPS, making this resolution the most versatile for this combo.
At 2560x1440, the measured average FPS values are: Low at 109 FPS, Medium at 86 FPS with a range of 73-99 FPS, High at 69 FPS, and Ultra at 53 FPS. The Medium preset's min FPS of 73 indicates that even in demanding scenes, the system stays above 60 FPS, which is a good sign for consistency. High at 69 FPS is also viable, but Ultra at 53 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less suitable for competitive multiplayer. The 1440p results show a 51% FPS reduction from Low to Ultra (109 to 53), which mirrors the 1080p pattern in percentage terms.
At 3840x2160, the measured average FPS values are: Low at 60 FPS, Medium at 48 FPS with a range of 41-55 FPS, High at 38 FPS, and Ultra at 30 FPS. Only Low achieves the 60 FPS target, and even that is exactly at the threshold with no headroom. The Medium preset's min FPS of 41 shows that frame rates can dip significantly in heavy multiplayer scenes, which may cause noticeable stutter. The 4K results show a 50% FPS reduction from Low to Ultra (60 to 30), consistent with the other resolutions, but the absolute values are too low for comfortable gameplay except at Low settings.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture (Navi 23 chip) using a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus providing 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 2055 MHz, with a boost clock of 2635 MHz and a game clock of 2410 MHz, while the memory runs at 2190 MHz (17.5 Gbps effective). These specifications place the card in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, with a PassMark G3D score of 17166, making it a mid-range performer for its generation.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor in Fivem's performance at higher resolutions. The measured data shows that at 4K Medium, the average FPS is 48 with a minimum of 41, suggesting that the GPU is struggling to manage the memory footprint of the game world at that resolution. Fivem, being a multiplayer modification, often features custom assets, player models, and world modifications that can increase VRAM usage beyond standard game requirements. The 128-bit memory bus and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are modest compared to higher-end cards, which explains the significant FPS drops when transitioning from 1440p to 4K.
The GPU's compute capabilities — 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs — provide 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a texture fill rate of 337.3 GTexel/s. These figures translate to the observed performance at 1080p, where the card delivers 104 FPS at High settings, indicating that it is well-suited for 1080p gaming with high quality presets. At 1440p, the card's performance drops to 69 FPS at High, which is still acceptable, but the Ultra preset at 53 FPS shows the limits of its pixel rate (168.6 GPixel/s) and ROP count. The GPU's nearest rivals in benchmarks — the NVIDIA Tesla K40m (0.6% lower) and AMD FirePro W7000 (0.7% lower) — are professional cards, not gaming-focused, which underscores the RX 6650 XT's position as a consumer-oriented GPU that prioritizes 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming.
The GPU's 32 ray tracing cores are present but not fully utilized in Fivem, as the game does not heavily rely on ray-traced effects. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern rendering features, but the measured FPS data suggests that the card's traditional rasterization performance is the primary driver of results. The 176 W TDP and suggested 450 W PSU indicate an efficient card, but the end-of-life production status and 399 USD launch MSRP position it as a previous-generation option that still delivers playable performance in Fivem at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700F
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 60.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 48.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 30.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 109.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 86.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 53.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 166.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 131.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 104.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 81.0 |
Fivem with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RX 6650 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.