Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 93 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 46 | 56 | 70 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 77 | 99 | 125 |
| 1080p Full HD | 90 | 123 | 151 | 189 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a performance profile in Fivem that is heavily dictated by resolution, with the CPU’s strong multi-threaded throughput becoming increasingly relevant as pixel count drops. The measured data shows a clear scaling pattern across the three tested resolutions, revealing where the bottleneck shifts between the processor and the graphics card.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1080p to 4K produces a dramatic reduction in frame rates, indicating that the RX 6700 XT becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. At the High preset, average FPS falls from 122.6 at 1920x1080 to 77.2 at 2560x1440, a reduction of approximately 37%, and then further to 46.4 at 3840x2160, which is about 40% lower than the 1440p result. This steep decline at 4K suggests the GPU is saturated, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p while the frame rate does not come close to scaling proportionally.
The Low preset tells a similar story but with a larger absolute spread. At 1920x1080, the combo reaches 188.8 FPS, which drops to 125.1 at 2560x1440 and then to 69.9 at 3840x2160. The 4K figure here is notably higher than the High preset’s 4K result, showing that reducing graphical load relieves the GPU enough to allow the CPU to push more frames, but the gap between 1080p and 4K remains substantial. The data indicates that at 1080p, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D is likely the limiting component, given the high frame rates achieved even at Ultra settings, whereas at 4K, the RX 6700 XT’s rendering capacity caps performance.
Settings Recommendations
The measured rows show that the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions, providing a meaningful frame rate uplift over High without the steep penalty seen at Ultra. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 151.1 FPS compared to 122.6 on High and 90.4 on Ultra, meaning Medium is about 23% faster than High and 67% faster than Ultra. At 2560x1440, Medium achieves 98.8 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while High drops to 77.2 and Ultra falls to 60.9. For 4K, Medium produces 55.6 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced multiplayer scenarios; High at 46.4 FPS and Ultra at 34.3 FPS are progressively less viable.
The Low preset provides the highest frame rates at every resolution, with 188.8 FPS at 1080p, 125.1 at 1440p, and 69.9 at 4K, but the visual compromise is substantial. For users prioritizing frame rate consistency, Medium represents the sweet spot, as it retains much of the visual fidelity of High while delivering a significant performance margin. The data suggests that Ultra is only suitable for 1080p gaming, where 90.4 FPS remains respectable, but it becomes a poor choice at higher resolutions due to the sharp drop to 60.9 FPS at 1440p and 34.3 FPS at 4K.
GPU Role
The Radeon RX 6700 XT’s specifications directly explain its behavior in Fivem’s measured results. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a mid-range card. The boost clock of 2581 MHz and game clock of 2424 MHz are high for the RDNA 2.0 architecture, and the 2560 shading units handle the game’s draw calls efficiently at lower resolutions. However, the 4K results show that the card’s raw throughput, rated at 13.21 TFLOPS FP32, is insufficient to maintain high frame rates when pixel count increases, as evidenced by the 46.4 FPS at High settings.
The GPU’s memory capacity is not a limiting factor in these tests, as 12 GB is ample for Fivem’s typical texture and asset loads. The bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s is the more critical specification, and the data shows that at 4K Ultra, the card struggles to keep up, producing just 34.3 FPS. This indicates that the GPU’s pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s is the bottleneck at high resolutions, rather than memory size or clock speed. The benchmarks for the GPU, such as a Passmark G3D score of 19786 and a percentile rank of 77 among all GPUs, place it in the upper mid-range tier, which aligns with its observed performance in Fivem.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D and RX 6700 XT ranks 985 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 55th percentile. This is a middle-of-the-pack result, which is somewhat surprising given the individual strengths of both components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 26574 places it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 33721 places it in the 77th percentile among all GPUs. The combo’s rank being lower than either component’s individual percentile suggests that Fivem’s multiplayer workload does not fully utilize the CPU’s capabilities, or that the GPU holds the combo back at higher resolutions.
The nearest rival CPUs, such as the Intel Core i9-11900K with a deltaPct of 0.1 and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with a deltaPct of -0.2, show that the 5800X3D is competitive with newer and older designs, but this does not translate into a top-tier gaming rank in this specific title. The GPU’s nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 6800 with a deltaPct of 0.7 and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 with a deltaPct of 1.3, are close in average score, yet the combo’s rank of 985 indicates that the pairing does not exceed expectations in Fivem’s unique server-side and client-side rendering demands.
CPU Role
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D’s architecture and cache configuration are the key factors in its gaming performance. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 3 (Vermeer) architecture, the CPU has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The standout feature is the 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is unusually large for a consumer processor and helps with game data locality. The measured results show that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 188.8 FPS, which is high enough to suggest the CPU is not a bottleneck at that resolution, but the 4K Low result of 69.9 FPS indicates the GPU is the limiting factor.
The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, as shown by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24063 and a Passmark multithread score of 28309, is strong, but Fivem’s multiplayer nature may not scale perfectly with 16 threads. The single-thread score of 3397 in Cinebench R23 is respectable, and the data suggests that the CPU’s high clock speeds and large cache help maintain frame rates at 1080p, where the GPU has headroom. The 3DMark scores, such as 7299 for 16 threads and 884 for single thread, further illustrate that the CPU is well-rounded, but the combo’s rank of 985 in Fivem implies that the game’s optimization does not fully leverage the 5800X3D’s strengths, possibly due to server-side scripting or network code limiting frame rates in certain scenarios.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 55.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 46.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 125.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 98.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 77.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 60.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 188.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 151.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 122.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 90.4 |
Fivem with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800X3D + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.