Fivem

# FAQ

Q: What is the combo rank of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in Fivem?

A: This combination ranks 502nd out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 13.5% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800X3D compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X3D has an average benchmark score of 27,896, which is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (27,887, 0% delta) and the Intel Core i9-10900K (27,872, 0.1% ahead). It also sits just 0.3% above the Intel Core i5-12600KF (27,799).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks in the 76th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 31,087. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31,206, -0.4% delta), showing the 4070 Ti SUPER performs essentially at par with that workstation card.

Q: What are the maximum and minimum average FPS recorded across all tested settings?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 285 at 1080p Low settings, while the lowest average FPS is 55 at 4K Ultra settings. The spread between these extremes is 230 FPS, highlighting a massive performance range depending on resolution and quality preset.

Q: Does the CPU's benchmark data suggest it is well-suited for Fivem's multi-threaded workload?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X3D scores 7,285 in 3DMark max-threads and 14,317 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its PassMark multithread score of 28,309 and data compression score of 329,688 indicate strong multi-threaded capability, which aligns with Fivem's need for handling many concurrent player scripts and world entities.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data with minimum and maximum values for all settings?

A: No, only the Medium preset at each resolution includes both minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p Medium, the range is 206 to 279 FPS (average 243); at 1440p Medium, the range is 136 to 184 FPS (average 160); at 4K Medium, the range is 75 to 102 FPS (average 89).

How This Combo Ranks

The data places this Ryzen 7 5800X3D + RTX 4070 Ti SUPER combination at rank 502 out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem. This is a strong showing, putting the system in the top 13.5% of all configurations evaluated for this game. The percentile placement suggests that while this is not an extreme top-tier setup, it delivers performance that outperforms roughly 86% of all tested combos in this specific multiplayer title.

What makes this ranking particularly notable is the context of the individual components. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 76th percentile among all graphics cards. When paired together in Fivem, their combined ranking of 502 out of 3,707 (roughly 86th percentile for combos) slightly exceeds what the individual component percentiles might suggest, indicating a synergistic pairing for this workload.

The CPU's nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score are the Ryzen 7 6800U (27,887) and Intel Core i9-10900K (27,872), with deltas of 0% and 0.1% respectively. This means the 5800X3D is essentially performance-equivalent to those processors in synthetic benchmarks, yet Fivem's real-world demands may favor the 3D V-Cache architecture, which is not fully captured in those average scores. The GPU's nearest rivals — the Quadro M5000 and GRID M60-1Q — are professional or datacenter parts, and the 4070 Ti SUPER holds a slight edge over them despite being a consumer gaming card.

GPU Role

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER brings 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is substantial for Fivem, which often loads large, detailed world textures across multiple player-created assets. The 16 GB capacity ensures that even at 4K resolution with high-detail custom content, the GPU is unlikely to hit memory capacity limits — a key advantage in a mod-heavy multiplayer environment.

Clock speeds sit at 2,340 MHz base and 2,610 MHz boost, with memory running at 1,313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The GPU's 8,448 shading units and 264 texture mapping units provide the raw compute throughput, rated at 44.10 TFLOPS FP32. In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes increasingly important at higher resolutions: the measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern where the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

At 1080p, the GPU is barely taxed, with FPS reaching 285 at Low settings — suggesting the CPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution. By 4K, the GPU's workload increases dramatically, with FPS dropping to 71 at High settings and 55 at Ultra. The 76th percentile GPU ranking and its near-parity with the Quadro M5000 (-0.4% delta) in average benchmark score indicate that this is a capable but not class-leading graphics solution for Fivem's specific rendering demands.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on which settings preset delivers the best experience at each resolution. At 1080p, the Medium preset (243 FPS average) offers an excellent balance — it is only 42 FPS below Low (285 FPS) but provides significantly better visual quality. The High preset (194 FPS) is also playable, while Ultra (151 FPS) remains smooth for most displays.

At 1440p, Medium (160 FPS) is the recommended choice. It maintains a high refresh rate experience while providing good visual fidelity, and the measured minimum of 136 FPS ensures consistent frame pacing. High (128 FPS) is viable for 144Hz monitors, while Low (203 FPS) and Ultra (99 FPS) cater to competitive and visual purists respectively.

At 4K, the situation changes. Medium (89 FPS) is the sweet spot — it provides a smooth experience on 60Hz displays with headroom for frame drops (minimum 75 FPS). High (71 FPS) is playable but leaves less margin, while Ultra (55 FPS) dips below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less ideal for consistent gameplay. Low (112 FPS) offers a high frame rate but sacrifices visual quality significantly at this resolution.

The data suggests that Medium settings provide the best experience across all three resolutions, balancing visual quality with frame rate consistency. The measured minimum FPS values for Medium (206 at 1080p, 136 at 1440p, 75 at 4K) indicate that this preset maintains stable performance without the severe drops that can occur with higher settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data paints a comprehensive picture of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional frame rates: Low settings produce 285 FPS average, Medium produces 243 FPS (with a 206-279 FPS range), High produces 194 FPS, and Ultra produces 151 FPS. This resolution shows the CPU's strength, as even Ultra settings maintain over 150 FPS.

Moving to 1440p, the performance remains strong but scales down proportionally. Low settings achieve 203 FPS, Medium averages 160 FPS (ranging from 136 to 184 FPS), High delivers 128 FPS, and Ultra drops to 99 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average reduction of approximately 30-35%, which is consistent with the increased pixel count.

At 4K, the GPU's workload becomes dominant. Low settings still manage 112 FPS, but Medium drops to 89 FPS (75-102 FPS range), High falls to 71 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 55 FPS. The 4K results show a more dramatic falloff between settings — the gap from Low to Ultra is 57 FPS, compared to 134 FPS at 1080p and 104 FPS at 1440p. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck, and settings changes have a more pronounced impact on frame rates.

The Medium preset consistently provides the most complete data with both minimum and maximum FPS values, allowing for a more detailed performance analysis. At all three resolutions, the minimum FPS values for Medium (206 at 1080p, 136 at 1440p, 75 at 4K) suggest that this setting avoids the severe frame drops that can plague less consistent configurations.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer codename), manufactured on TSMC's 7nm process. It operates at a 3.40 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.50 GHz, with a TDP of 105W. The defining feature is its 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is exceptionally large and particularly beneficial for gaming workloads.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is critical at lower resolutions. The 1080p results show that even at Low settings (285 FPS), the system is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution. The 5800X3D's benchmark scores reinforce its gaming strength: it achieves 884 in 3DMark single-thread and 1,452 in Cinebench R23 single-core, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3,234. These single-threaded results are essential for Fivem, which relies heavily on a few main threads for game logic and script processing.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is equally solid, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 14,317 and Geekbench multi-core at 11,765. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 1,746 (2 threads) to 5,906 (8 threads) and 7,285 (max threads), indicating good thread scaling. In Fivem's multiplayer environment, where dozens of player scripts, vehicle physics, and world interactions run concurrently, this multi-threaded capability helps maintain smooth framerates even in crowded servers.

The CPU's 80th percentile ranking among all processors, combined with its aggressive cache design, suggests it is well-optimized for the kind of latency-sensitive, cache-heavy workloads that Fivem presents. Its nearest rivals by average benchmark score (Ryzen 7 6800U at 0% delta, Core i9-10900K at 0.1% delta) are comparable in synthetic tests, but the 5800X3D's 96 MB L3 cache likely provides a real-world advantage in Fivem that these benchmarks do not fully capture.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about where the bottleneck lies in this system. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 285 at 1080p to 203 at 1440p (a 28.8% decrease) and then to 112 at 4K (a 44.8% decrease from 1440p). This pattern shows that even at Low settings, the GPU is progressively more taxed as resolution increases, but the CPU remains capable of feeding it adequately.

At Medium settings, the scaling is similar: 243 FPS at 1080p drops to 160 at 1440p (34.2% decrease) and 89 at 4K (44.4% decrease from 1440p). The High settings show 194 FPS at 1080p, 128 at 1440p (34.0% decrease), and 71 at 4K (44.5% decrease). Ultra settings follow the same trend: 151 at 1080p, 99 at 1440p (34.4% decrease), and 55 at 4K (44.4% decrease).

The consistent ~34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and ~44% drop from 1440p to 4K across all settings reveals that the system's scaling behavior is resolution-dominated rather than settings-dominated. This indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU's performance headroom at 1080p becomes less relevant as pixel count increases.

The 4K results, particularly the Ultra setting at 55 FPS, suggest that this combination is not ideally suited for 4K gaming at maximum quality in Fivem. The GPU's 76th percentile ranking and its near-parity with the Quadro M5000 (-0.4% delta) in average benchmark score indicate that while it is a capable card, it does not have the raw throughput to maintain high frame rates at 4K with demanding settings. For players targeting 4K, the data suggests Medium settings (89 FPS) provide the best balance, while 1440p and 1080p allow for more headroom with higher settings.