Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a highly capable Fivem experience, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions. The data shows this combination ranks in the 52nd percentile of tested configurations, indicating a balanced mid-to-high-tier setup that prioritizes frame rate at 1080p and 1440p while handling 4K with compromises. The 12 GB VRAM buffer and 8-core processor provide a solid foundation for the game's multiplayer demands, though the CPU's older PCIe Gen 3 interface and the GPU's end-of-life status color the overall results.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 yields the highest frame rates, with the Low preset hitting 191 FPS and High reaching 120 FPS. At 2560x1440, performance remains strong at 126 FPS on Low, but 3840x2160 drops to 70 FPS on Low, making 1080p the clear target for smooth multiplayer action.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27,051 on average, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-9900K (27,097) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (26,936). It also trails the Intel Core i5-14400T by 0.4% (27,166) while beating the Intel Core i7-1370P by 0.6% (26,900).

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to its benchmark peers?

A: The RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 27,425, placing it essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (27,435, deltaPct 0). It sits 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (27,565) and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (27,135), while outperforming the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 by 1.5% (27,839).

Q: Does the game favor CPU or GPU performance?

A: The frame rate scaling suggests a balanced load. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 191 FPS, showing CPU headroom, but 4K Ultra drops to 34 FPS, indicating the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads handle multiplayer logic well, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM supports texture-heavy scenes.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU, and does it affect the analysis?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT had a launch MSRP of 479 USD. This figure is provided for reference only; benchmark results are independent of historical pricing and reflect measured performance in Fivem.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 1,937 out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it just past the midpoint of the database. This rank is consistent with the component-level percentiles: the CPU sits at the 79th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU at the 72nd percentile.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This VRAM capacity is significant for Fivem, a multiplayer title where large player counts and custom assets can inflate memory usage, allowing High and Ultra settings to run without texture thrashing at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's 2560 shading units and 160 texture mapping units provide the raw throughput needed for the game's open-world rendering, with a boost clock of 2581 MHz and a game clock of 2424 MHz ensuring sustained performance under load.

The GPU's compute capabilities are notable: 13.21 TFLOPS FP32 and 26.43 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) place it in a competitive position for a 2021-era card. Its pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s translate to strong fill rates that benefit Fivem's environment detail. The 40 ray accelerators are present but less relevant for this title, which does not heavily utilize ray tracing based on the measured frame rates. The GPU's percentile ranking at 72nd among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27,425, aligns with its mid-range positioning—close to the RTX 4070 Mobile (27,435) and RTX 3090 (27,565) in synthetic tests, though real-world Fivem results depend heavily on resolution and preset.

At 1080p, the GPU handles all presets comfortably, with Ultra averaging 93 FPS. Moving to 1440p, Ultra drops to 62 FPS, while 4K Ultra falls to 34 FPS. This scaling highlights the GPU's 12 GB buffer as sufficient for 1440p High (79 FPS) but insufficient to maintain fluid rates at 4K Ultra, where the memory bandwidth and pixel rate become bottlenecks. The GPU's end-of-life status means no future driver optimizations are expected, but current Fivem results show a capable card for mainstream resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 3 architecture, built on TSMC's 7 nm process. With a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, it offers strong single-thread performance for game logic and multi-thread capacity for background tasks. The 16 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support (51.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide adequate data flow for Fivem's simulation-heavy multiplayer environments, where dozens of players and vehicles require consistent CPU updates.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 12,830.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,494 in single-core, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 9,950 and single-core of 1,894. Its Passmark multi-thread score of 24,419 and single-thread score of 3,283 reinforce its balanced profile. The processor's 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27,051, places it near the Intel Core i9-9900K (27,097) and ahead of the Ryzen AI 7 445 (26,936), indicating it is a solid, though not top-tier, gaming CPU.

The CPU's PCIe Gen 3 interface (16 lanes) could theoretically limit GPU bandwidth, but the measured FPS suggests this is not a practical constraint in Fivem. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 191 FPS, showing the CPU can feed frames well above display refresh rates. The 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier indicate efficiency and overclocking potential, though the data reflects stock behavior. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics are irrelevant when the discrete GPU is present, but they confirm the APU's versatility. The CPU's 3DMark scores—6,629 for 16 threads and 899 for single-thread—mirror its gaming-oriented design, with multi-core scaling benefiting Fivem's server-side tick rate and client-side physics.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 1,937 out of 3,707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it at roughly the 52nd percentile. This mid-pack position is slightly below what the individual component percentiles (CPU at 79th, GPU at 72nd) might suggest, indicating that Fivem's specific workload does not perfectly align with synthetic benchmarks. The rank reflects a system that can achieve high frame rates at 1080p and playable rates at 1440p, but it falls behind top-tier combos that pair newer CPUs with higher-end GPUs.

Given the CPU's nearest rivals—the i9-9900K (0.2% faster) and i5-14400T (0.4% faster)—and the GPU's near-tie with the RTX 4070 Mobile and RTX 3090, this combo's rank is consistent with a mid-2020s performance tier. The 1080p Ultra result of 93 FPS puts it in contention with systems that achieve 100+ FPS at that setting, while the 4K Ultra result of 34 FPS shows a clear ceiling. The rank is not a verdict on quality but a positioning: this combo will satisfy players targeting 60+ FPS at 1440p High or 120+ FPS at 1080p Medium, but it will not lead any 4K leaderboards.

The gap between the 52nd percentile rank and the component percentiles suggests that Fivem's multiplayer overhead—which can be CPU-heavy with many players—dampens the GPU's advantage. The 8-core CPU handles the load, but the lack of a newer PCIe Gen 4 interface and the GPU's RDNA 2 architecture may limit performance in specific scenes. Still, the combo outperforms lower-ranked configs by a wide margin, as evidenced by the 126 FPS 1440p Low result versus 34 FPS 4K Ultra, showing the rank reflects capability across a broad settings range.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data reveals a consistent drop as resolution increases, with the most dramatic falloffs occurring between 1440p and 4K. At Low settings, average FPS goes from 191 at 1080p to 126 at 1440p (a 34% reduction) and then to 70 at 4K (a further 44% reduction). This pattern indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more limiting at higher resolutions, as the CPU's frame generation capacity remains relatively constant while pixel throughput requirements escalate.

The Medium preset shows a similar trajectory: 151 FPS at 1080p, 99 FPS at 1440p, and 55 FPS at 4K, with minimum FPS of 128, 84, and 47 respectively. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p (a 34% drop) and from 1440p to 4K (a 44% drop) is nearly identical to Low, suggesting the game's rendering load scales predictably with pixel count. High settings follow suit: 120 FPS at 1080p, 79 FPS at 1440p, and 44 FPS at 4K, with the 1440p-to-4K decline again larger. Ultra shows the steepest absolute drop: 93 FPS at 1080p, 62 FPS at 1440p, and 34 FPS at 4K.

This scaling points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck at 4K, where even Low settings (70 FPS) cannot maintain the 1440p Low frame rate (126 FPS). At 1080p, the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads prevent it from being a limiting factor, as evidenced by the 191 FPS Low result. However, the 4K Ultra result of 34 FPS suggests that the 12 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the highest detail at that resolution. Players seeking 60+ FPS at 4K would need to use Low settings, while 1440p Ultra (62 FPS) remains viable for those prioritizing detail.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results across all presets. Low settings average 191 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium averages 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 and maximum of 173, providing a smooth experience with moderate visual improvements. High drops to 120 FPS, still excellent for competitive play, while Ultra averages 93 FPS—a playable but noticeably lower figure that prioritizes fidelity over speed.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but requires preset selection. Low averages 126 FPS, retaining high-refresh viability. Medium averages 99 FPS with a minimum of 84 and maximum of 114, offering a balanced compromise. High averages 79 FPS, which is comfortable for most displays, while Ultra averages 62 FPS—just above the 60 FPS threshold but with less headroom for demanding scenes. The 1440p results suggest this is the resolution sweet spot for the combo, balancing visual quality and frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. Low averages 70 FPS, which is playable but far from the 1440p Low figure. Medium averages 55 FPS with a minimum of 47 and maximum of 63, indicating occasional dips below 60 FPS. High averages 44 FPS, making it unsuitable for fast-paced multiplayer, while Ultra averages 34 FPS, which is only viable for single-player or low-intensity scenarios. The 4K data confirms that this combo is not designed for native 4K gaming, but it can handle 4K Low for players who prioritize resolution over detail.

The minimum FPS figures, where available, show consistency: the Medium preset at 4K has a min of 47 FPS, while at 1440p it is 84 FPS and at 1080p it is 128 FPS. This pattern indicates that frame pacing remains stable across resolutions, with no severe stutters, but the lower averages at 4K reduce the overall experience. The data supports a verdict: this combo excels at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K reserved for Low settings, and ranks as a mid-tier option in the broader Fivem benchmark database.