Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 produces a highly capable Fivem setup, landing at rank 1048 out of 3707 tested combos in this database. That places it comfortably in the upper third of all configurations, which is a strong result for a CPU that also carries integrated graphics. The data shows this pairing is balanced enough to push high refresh rates at 1440p while remaining playable at 4K, though the RTX 3080 clearly does most of the heavy lifting in this multiplayer title.

How This Combo Ranks

At rank 1048 out of 3707 combos, this pairing sits in the top 28% of all tested configurations for Fivem. That is a solid position, but not an elite one — the ranking reflects that the Ryzen 7 5700G, while a competent eight-core processor, is not the fastest CPU available, and Fivem’s multiplayer nature can be sensitive to single-thread performance and memory latency. The RTX 3080’s raw GPU power compensates for many CPU limitations, but the combo rank suggests there is headroom for improvement if the CPU were swapped for a stronger part.

The CPU itself benchmarks at a 79th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27051. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i9-9900K (average score 27097, delta -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (average score 26936, delta 0.4%), the Intel Core i5-14400T (average score 27166, delta -0.4%), and the Intel Core i7-1370P (average score 26900, delta 0.6%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the 5700G performs essentially identically to a range of modern and previous-generation processors in synthetic benchmarks. For Fivem, this translates to predictable CPU behavior — neither a bottleneck nor a standout advantage.

The GPU, meanwhile, holds a 68th percentile versus all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273, delta -0.4%), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23276, delta -0.4%). On paper, this looks like the RTX 3080 is barely ahead of these parts, but that is a quirk of the benchmark database — the RTX 3080’s measured FPS in Fivem tells a far more compelling story than its synthetic average score suggests. The GPU’s percentile rank is lower than its actual gaming performance would indicate, which is common when synthetic benchmarks weight compute tasks differently than real-world game loads.

GPU Role

The RTX 3080 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications explain why. It carries 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. That memory configuration is ample for Fivem at 1080p and 1440p, where the game’s asset streaming and draw distances benefit from fast memory throughput. At 4K, the 10 GB capacity is sufficient for the measured settings, though the data shows the GPU’s compute limits become the primary constraint at that resolution.

The GPU’s clocks are set at a base of 1440 MHz and a boost of 1710 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). These clocks are standard for the Ampere architecture, and the boost behavior in Fivem will depend on thermal headroom and power delivery. The card has 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, which are high counts that drive its strong FPS figures. The 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores are not directly relevant to Fivem’s rasterization-based rendering, but they contribute to the card’s overall feature set.

The FP32 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS gives the RTX 3080 enormous raw compute power, and Fivem’s open-world environments with many player models and vehicles benefit from this. The measured FPS data confirms the GPU’s role: at 1080p Low, the combo hits 250 FPS average, which is a GPU-bound result given the low CPU load at those settings. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 45 FPS, showing that the card’s limits are reached when both resolution and settings are maxed. The GPU is the clear performance driver across all measured rows, while the CPU provides enough support to avoid severe bottlenecks at most settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals how the workload shifts between components. At 1080p High, the combo averages 157 FPS; at 1440p High, it drops to 104 FPS; at 4K High, it falls to 58 FPS. That is a 34% reduction from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 44% reduction from 1440p to 4K. These are large proportional drops, indicating that Fivem becomes increasingly GPU-bound as resolution rises. The CPU has less impact at higher resolutions because the GPU takes longer to render each frame, giving the processor more time to feed it data.

At Low settings, the scaling is steeper in absolute terms: 250 FPS at 1080p, 164 FPS at 1440p, and 91 FPS at 4K. The 1080p Low result of 250 FPS is likely near the CPU's practical limit in Fivem, as the game’s multiplayer logic and physics simulation become the bottleneck when the GPU is barely stressed. The drop to 164 FPS at 1440p Low shows the GPU starting to take over, and 91 FPS at 4K Low confirms that even a powerful card like the RTX 3080 cannot maintain triple-digit frame rates at that resolution without higher settings.

The Medium preset tells a similar story: 197 FPS at 1080p, 130 FPS at 1440p, and 72 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset drops to 122 FPS at 1080p, 80 FPS at 1440p, and 45 FPS at 4K. Across all settings, the pattern is consistent — 4K roughly halves the 1080p frame rate, while 1440p sits about two-thirds of the way between. This behavior points to a system where the RTX 3080 is the limiting component at 4K, the CPU becomes more relevant at 1080p, and 1440p represents the sweet spot where neither part is severely overworked.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Starting at 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest frame rates. At Low settings, the average FPS is 250, which is an excellent result for competitive play. Medium settings yield 197 FPS average, with a minimum of 167 FPS and a maximum of 226 FPS — the only row in the dataset with min/max values, indicating stable frame pacing. High settings drop to 157 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 122 FPS average. Even at Ultra, the combo stays well above 100 FPS at 1080p, making this resolution fully playable with any preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the GPU working harder. Low settings average 164 FPS, which is still high enough for fast-paced multiplayer. Medium settings average 130 FPS, with a minimum of 110 FPS and a maximum of 149 FPS — again showing a tight range that suggests consistent performance. High settings average 104 FPS, and Ultra settings average 80 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1440p is the ideal resolution for this combo if you want a balance between visual fidelity and high refresh rates.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 3080’s limits become apparent. Low settings average 91 FPS, which is playable but below the 100 FPS threshold that many gamers prefer. Medium settings average 72 FPS, High settings average 58 FPS, and Ultra settings average 45 FPS. The 4K Medium result includes a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 83 FPS, showing that even at this resolution, frame pacing remains acceptable. However, 4K Ultra at 45 FPS average is borderline for a multiplayer title where reaction times matter, and 4K High at 58 FPS is only marginally better.

The data shows no min or max FPS values for most rows, which means the database only recorded average FPS for those configurations. The Medium settings at each resolution are the exceptions, with 1080p Medium ranging from 167 to 226 FPS, 1440p Medium ranging from 110 to 149 FPS, and 4K Medium ranging from 61 to 83 FPS. These ranges are tight, suggesting the combo maintains consistent performance without severe stutters or frame time spikes in Fivem.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p, the best experience is clearly at High settings with 157 FPS average. Ultra at 122 FPS is also smooth, but the jump from High to Ultra costs 35 FPS for diminishing visual returns in a game like Fivem where the difference between High and Ultra is often subtle. Low settings at 250 FPS are only useful for competitive players who prioritize maximum frame rates over visuals, and Medium at 197 FPS is a reasonable middle ground if you want extra smoothness.

At 1440p, High settings at 104 FPS average provide the best combination of visual quality and performance. Ultra at 80 FPS is still playable, but the drop from 104 to 80 FPS is significant, and the visual gains from High to Ultra are minor in Fivem’s engine. Medium at 130 FPS is the choice for players who want higher frame rates and are willing to reduce some visual details. Low at 164 FPS is viable for competitive play, though the graphical downgrade is noticeable on a 1440p monitor.

At 4K, the recommendation shifts to Medium settings at 72 FPS average. High at 58 FPS is playable but marginal for a multiplayer game, and Ultra at 45 FPS is too low for smooth gameplay. Low at 91 FPS is the best option for frame rate purists, but Medium provides a better visual experience while still staying above 60 FPS. The 4K Medium row shows a minimum of 61 FPS, which means the combo rarely dips below the 60 FPS threshold, making it the safest choice for 4K gaming.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience because it maintains higher frame rates than High or Ultra while avoiding the visual degradation of Low. The measured rows show that Medium consistently delivers frame rates that are roughly 25-30% higher than High at the same resolution, which is a meaningful difference in a fast-paced multiplayer environment. If you own a 1440p monitor, High settings at 104 FPS is the sweet spot; if you are on 4K, Medium at 72 FPS is the practical limit for this combo.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 7 5700G is an eight-core, sixteen-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU’s cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache, which is a modest amount for a modern processor. It supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5700G scores 12830.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1494 in single-core, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 9950 and single-core of 1894. Its 3DMark scores range from 899 in single-thread to 6629 in 16-thread tests. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 24419 and a single-thread score of 3283. These numbers place the CPU in the same performance tier as the Intel Core i9-9900K, with a delta of only -0.2%, meaning the 5700G is essentially tied with that older flagship.

For Fivem, the CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the combo hits 250 FPS average. That frame rate is likely near the CPU’s practical ceiling in this game, as Fivem’s multiplayer servers can load many scripts and entities that stress single-thread performance. The 5700G’s single-core score of 1494 in Cinebench R23 is decent but not exceptional, and the boost clock of 4.60 GHz helps keep frame rates high in CPU-bound scenarios. The 16 MB of L3 cache is smaller than some competing processors, which can affect performance in games that rely on large working sets, but Fivem does not appear to be severely cache-sensitive based on the measured results.

The CPU’s integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics are not used in this configuration since the RTX 3080 handles all rendering, but the 5700G’s 65 W TDP means it runs cool and leaves thermal headroom for the GPU. The processor’s 16 threads are more than sufficient for Fivem, which rarely uses more than a few cores, and the multi-thread scores show there is plenty of spare capacity for background tasks while gaming. The 5700G’s performance in this combo is adequate but not exceptional — it does not bottleneck the RTX 3080 at 1440p or 4K, but at 1080p Low, the CPU becomes the limiting factor, as evidenced by the 250 FPS ceiling.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 5700G holds its own. The Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097 versus 27051 for the 5700G, a negligible difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 26936, the Intel Core i5-14400T scores 27166, and the Intel Core i7-1370P scores 26900 — all within 0.6% of the 5700G. This means that in Fivem, swapping the 5700G for any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates, assuming the GPU and memory setup remain unchanged. The CPU is not the star of this combo, but it is a reliable partner that does not hold back the RTX 3080 in most scenarios.