Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination ranks 1070th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. This percentile position indicates that while the pairing is far from the top of the leaderboard, it sits comfortably above the bottom quartile of systems tested for this title. The CPU itself holds the 83rd percentile among all processors, which suggests the bottleneck in this pairing is likely not the Ryzen 7 5700G, given its strong synthetic benchmark scores such as 20,755 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2,930 in single-core. The RTX 2070 SUPER, sitting at the 65th percentile among GPUs, is more of a mid-range contender, and the combined rank reflects that the GPU is the limiting factor in achieving higher frame rates in this multiplayer title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1070 out of 1792 puts this system in the 59.7th percentile of all tested pairings for Fivem. This is a respectable but not outstanding position, meaning roughly 40% of tested configurations deliver better performance in this game. The CPU’s individual standing is notably stronger than the combo’s overall rank, with the Ryzen 7 5700G outperforming its nearest rivals by a slim margin. Against the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, the 5700G trails by just 0.3% in average benchmark score, while it leads the Intel Xeon D-2752TER by 0.4% and the Intel Core 5 210H by 0.5%. The gap to the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is 0.6% in favor of the 5700G. These sub-1% deltas indicate that the CPU is performing exactly as expected for its class, offering no surprises that would artificially inflate or deflate the combo ranking. The GPU side tells a similar story; the RTX 2070 SUPER sits 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A400, 2.3% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile, but ahead of the GTX TITAN Z by 0.9% and the RX 5700 by 2.5%. This balanced performance on both components suggests the 1070th rank is a fair representation of what this hardware can achieve in Fivem.

GPU Role

The RTX 2070 SUPER brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1605 MHz and boosts to 1770 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). These specifications, combined with 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs, position the card as a capable 1440p performer, which the measured FPS data confirms. In Fivem, the GPU’s role is critical, as the game’s multiplayer nature often involves complex scenes with many players, vehicles, and environmental details that stress the rasterization pipeline. The 12 nm Turing architecture, with 40 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, provides 9.062 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, though Fivem does not heavily utilize ray tracing or DLSS features, meaning the card’s traditional shading performance is what matters most. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22,206 places it just 0.5% below the RTX A400, and its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is a solid mid-range option, but one that will struggle at higher resolutions with maxed-out settings, as seen in the 4K Ultra result of 33.1 FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p, the combo delivers frame rates that range from 86.1 FPS at Ultra to 176.8 FPS at Low, with High settings hitting 112.6 FPS and Medium at 139.3 FPS. Moving to 1440p, the same settings show a significant drop: Ultra falls to 56.3 FPS, High to 75.2 FPS, Medium to 88.8 FPS, and Low to 112.5 FPS. This represents a 34.6% reduction at Ultra, 33.2% at High, 36.2% at Medium, and 36.3% at Low when moving from 1080p to 1440p. The consistency of this drop across settings strongly suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as the frame rate scaling aligns with the pixel count increase from 2.07 million to 3.69 million pixels, a 78% increase that yields roughly 35% fewer frames. At 4K, the trend continues but becomes more pronounced: Ultra drops to 33.1 FPS, High to 41.7 FPS, Medium to 51.4 FPS, and Low to 65.8 FPS. The 4K results are less than half of the 1080p numbers at every setting, with the Ultra preset showing a 61.6% reduction from 86.1 to 33.1 FPS. This steep decline at 4K confirms that the RTX 2070 SUPER lacks the raw throughput to maintain playable frame rates at that resolution, even with the capable Ryzen 7 5700G feeding it data. The CPU’s 16 MB of L3 cache and 8 Zen 3 cores are sufficient to avoid becoming the bottleneck, as evidenced by the smooth scaling curve that mirrors GPU-bound behavior.

Settings Recommendations

Given the measured results, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, the High preset at 112.6 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, easily exceeding the 60 FPS threshold and approaching the 144 Hz mark for competitive play. The Ultra preset at 86.1 FPS is still playable but the 23.5% performance penalty over High is not justified by the marginal visual improvements in a multiplayer title where responsiveness matters. At 1440p, the High preset at 75.2 FPS is the recommended choice, as it remains above 60 FPS and provides a smooth experience, while Medium at 88.8 FPS is a viable alternative for those prioritizing frame rate over detail. The Ultra preset at 56.3 FPS dips below the 60 FPS threshold, which can introduce noticeable stutter in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. For 4K, no preset delivers a consistently smooth experience; the Low preset at 65.8 FPS is the only option above 60 FPS, but it sacrifices significant visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 51.4 FPS and High at 41.7 FPS are both below the playable threshold for most users, and Ultra at 33.1 FPS is effectively unplayable for competitive play. The data indicates that 1440p High is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a 78% higher frame rate than 4K High while maintaining most of the visual quality that makes the game immersive.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance across all settings. The Low preset achieves 176.8 FPS, which is the highest measured result in the entire dataset, indicating that the CPU and GPU can easily handle the game’s lighter load when visual effects are minimized. Medium produces 139.3 FPS, still well above any refresh rate concern, and High follows at 112.6 FPS. The Ultra preset at 86.1 FPS is the only 1080p setting that drops below 100 FPS, but it remains entirely playable. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 51.3% reduction in frame rate, which is a moderate penalty for the increased visual detail. At 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low hits 112.5 FPS, which is nearly identical to the 1080p High result, demonstrating that the GPU can handle the extra pixels when settings are reduced. Medium delivers 88.8 FPS, High drops to 75.2 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 56.3 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is exactly 50.0%, mirroring the 1080p scaling. At 3840x2160, the results show the GPU hitting its limits. Low produces 65.8 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS threshold, but Medium falls to 51.4 FPS, a 21.9% drop from Low. High manages 41.7 FPS, and Ultra reaches only 33.1 FPS, which is a 49.7% reduction from Low. The 4K results highlight a clear wall where the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates, even with the Ryzen 7 5700G’s strong single-thread performance (2,930 in Cinebench R23) ensuring the CPU is never the limiting factor. The data suggests that users should stick to 1080p or 1440p to get the most out of this pairing, as the 4K experience is compromised across all settings.