Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 1993rd out of 3707 tested combos for Fivem. That places it in the lower-middle portion of the field — roughly the 46th percentile of all tested systems. This is not a top-tier pairing for this specific multiplayer title, but it is far from the bottom of the barrel. The ranking reflects a balanced but modest setup: an 8-core CPU that lands in the 78th percentile among all CPUs, paired with a GPU that sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Neither component is a standout performer in its class, and the combo result is consistent with that middling profile.

What matters more than the raw rank is how the two parts interact in Fivem. The data shows a system that is capable of playable frame rates across most settings, but one that will require compromises at higher resolutions. The RTX 4060's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the likely ceiling for 4K performance, while the Ryzen 7 5700's 16 threads provide enough headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions. In short, this combo ranks where it does because it delivers competent 1080p and 1440p performance without excelling anywhere.

GPU Role

The RTX 4060 carries the visual workload here, and its specifications tell a clear story. The GPU runs with a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 3072 shading units. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores are present but Fivem is not a path-traced showcase; the traditional raster performance is what drives these numbers.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution climbs. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 189 FPS average, indicating the GPU is not the limiting factor at that setting. But at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 34 FPS — a clear sign that the 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit bus are struggling with the increased pixel count and texture loads. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but at 3840x2160 it becomes a constraint. The RTX 4060's 61st percentile GPU ranking, with an average benchmark score of 17639, aligns with this behavior: it is a mid-range part that handles lower resolutions comfortably but hits a wall at 4K.

The GPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (avg score 17666, 0.2% ahead) and the AMD Radeon 780M (avg score 17588, 0.3% behind). These deltas are tiny, but the RTX 4060's feature set — more VRAM and modern architecture — makes it the better choice for Fivem specifically. The measured frames confirm that the GPU is the dominant factor in determining FPS once you move past 1080p.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and reveals where the bottleneck lives. At 1080p Low, the combo averages 189 FPS. At 1440p Low, that falls to 124 FPS — a 34% reduction. At 4K Low, it drops further to 69 FPS, which is a 63% reduction from 1080p. This pattern is consistent across all settings: the scaling penalty from 1080p to 4K ranges from roughly 58% at High (119 to 44 FPS) to 63% at Low. The percentage losses are large, which points to the GPU being the primary limiter at higher resolutions.

Look at the Medium preset for a more detailed picture. At 1080p Medium, the average is 149 FPS with a minimum of 127 and maximum of 171. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 98 FPS (min 83, max 113). At 4K Medium, the average falls to 54 FPS (min 46, max 63). The gap between 1080p and 1440p is 51 FPS, while the gap between 1440p and 4K is 44 FPS. The scaling is not linear — the 4K penalty is slightly less severe in absolute terms, but the percentage drop per step is consistent. This indicates that the CPU is keeping up fine; the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity are what degrade as resolution increases.

The CPU's role in this scaling is minimal. The Ryzen 7 5700's 3DMark scores — 901 single-thread, 6617 max-threads — show enough sustained multi-threaded performance to feed frames at 1080p, where the GPU is not saturated. As resolution climbs, the GPU takes over as the constraint, and the CPU has spare capacity. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, 189 FPS is achievable without CPU bottlenecking, but at 4K Ultra, 34 FPS is purely a GPU limitation.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Here are the exact measured averages for this combo in Fivem, broken down by resolution and settings.

At 1920x1080:

• Low: 189 FPS average
• Medium: 149 FPS average (min 127, max 171)
• High: 119 FPS average
• Ultra: 92 FPS average

At 2560x1440:

• Low: 124 FPS average
• Medium: 98 FPS average (min 83, max 113)
• High: 78 FPS average
• Ultra: 61 FPS average

At 3840x2160:

• Low: 69 FPS average
• Medium: 54 FPS average (min 46, max 63)
• High: 44 FPS average
• Ultra: 34 FPS average

The pattern is predictable. Each step from Low to Ultra costs roughly 30-35% of the previous setting's FPS at a given resolution. At 1080p, the jump from Low to Medium costs 40 FPS, Medium to High costs 30 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 27 FPS. The diminishing returns are visible: the gap between Low and Medium is larger than the gap between High and Ultra. This is typical of a GPU that has enough raw power for Low settings but becomes increasingly strained as texture quality and shading complexity rise.

At 1440p, the same pattern holds but with lower absolute numbers. Low hits 124 FPS, which is still smooth for most displays, while Ultra lands at 61 FPS — just at the edge of playability for 60 Hz monitors. At 4K, only Low (69 FPS) and Medium (54 FPS) are remotely playable; High (44 FPS) and Ultra (34 FPS) are not suitable for competitive play. The minimum FPS figures for Medium settings — 127 at 1080p, 83 at 1440p, 46 at 4K — show that frame pacing holds up reasonably well, with no severe stutter reported in the data.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gameplay, the data suggests that Medium is the sweet spot. The 149 FPS average with a 127 FPS minimum is well above the refresh rate of most standard monitors, and the visual upgrade from Low is substantial. High (119 FPS) is also viable if you prefer image quality, but Ultra (92 FPS) starts to dip below the threshold where high-refresh displays can fully benefit. If you have a 144 Hz monitor, Medium is the recommended pick — it delivers a 149 FPS average and the 127 FPS minimum ensures you stay above 120 FPS in most scenes.

At 1440p, High (78 FPS) is the best balance for 60 Hz displays, but Medium (98 FPS) is the better choice for 75 Hz or higher refresh rates. The 83 FPS minimum at Medium means you will rarely drop below 80 FPS, which is smooth for most gaming. Ultra (61 FPS) is playable but leaves no headroom for dips, and the data shows no minimum FPS recorded for that setting, which suggests inconsistent frame times. Low (124 FPS) is unnecessarily sacrificing visual quality when Medium offers a 98 FPS average with a comfortable minimum.

At 4K, the options are limited. Low (69 FPS) is the only setting that clears 60 FPS, and it does so by a slim margin. Medium (54 FPS) is acceptable for slower-paced play, but the 46 FPS minimum is risky in busy multiplayer scenes. High (44 FPS) and Ultra (34 FPS) are not recommended for this resolution. If 4K is a priority, you would need to accept Low settings or consider a different GPU. For most users on this combo, sticking to 1080p or 1440p with Medium or High presets will provide the best experience.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is a Zen 3 part with 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It has 16 MB of L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus. The CPU's benchmark scores are respectable: Cinebench R23 multi-core hits 20655, single-core hits 2916, and 3DMark max-threads reaches 6617. Its percentile rank of 78 among all CPUs puts it above average, but its nearest rivals — the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25530 avg, 0.1% ahead) and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (25550 avg, 0.1% ahead) — are within a rounding error of its average score of 25517.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is to keep the frame pipeline fed, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the 189 FPS average suggests the CPU is doing its job — it can push well past 150 FPS without becoming the limiting factor. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1762 and single-thread score of 901 indicate adequate per-core performance for a game that relies on a few heavily loaded threads. Fivem, being a multiplayer mod, often has server-side scripting and world simulation that can tax the CPU; the 8-core/16-thread configuration here provides enough parallel capacity to handle those workloads.

The CPU's 16 threads matter more at lower resolutions. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU takes over as the bottleneck, and the CPU has headroom to spare. The data shows no evidence of CPU throttling or frame drops that would indicate a processor limitation. The 65W TDP and 7nm process mean it runs efficiently, but that is not a performance metric. What matters is that the Ryzen 7 5700 is not the weak link in this combo — it comfortably supports the GPU's output at 1080p and steps aside at higher resolutions. If you were to pair this CPU with a stronger GPU, it would likely hold up, but as configured, it is a balanced partner for the RTX 4060.