Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination places at rank 1005 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This places the pairing in the middle of the database, meaning a substantial portion of tested systems deliver higher frame rates, but it also outperforms a significant share of the field. The rank reflects a balance between the CPU's strong multi-threaded capacity and the GPU's mid-range positioning, making this combo a dependable, if not top-tier, option for the game.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1005 out of 1792 indicates it sits just past the midpoint of all tested configurations. This is not a leaderboard-topping result, but it is far from a bottom-tier showing. The data suggests that the pairing is well-matched for Fivem, as neither component severely bottlenecks the other in typical gameplay scenarios. The CPU’s performance percentile of 82 versus all processors is notably higher than the GPU’s percentile of 66 versus all graphics cards, implying the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does.

When examining the CPU’s synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 5700X3D achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366 and a single-core score of 3157. In the database, this places it within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-1360P and 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, according to its average benchmark score. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19545 places it within 0.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600M and 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti. These close margins highlight that the combo’s mid-pack ranking is a product of two components that are each competitive within their respective performance tiers, though neither is a standout outlier in this specific title.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The GPU’s boost clock is rated at 2460 MHz, with a base clock of 1830 MHz. These specifications are directly relevant to Fivem’s performance scaling across different resolutions. The 8 GB frame buffer is sufficient for the game’s asset streaming at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440, but the data shows a notable drop at 3840x2160, where memory pressure and bandwidth limitations become more apparent.

The GPU’s shading units total 3072, with 96 texture mapping units and 48 raster output units, producing a pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s. For a multiplayer title like Fivem, which often involves dense urban environments with many player models, these figures dictate how quickly the card can process draw calls and texture fills. The FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS provides adequate compute headroom for the game’s physics and effects. The card’s 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it is a solid mid-range performer, capable of handling the game at high settings at lower resolutions, but the measured FPS data shows clear degradation as resolution increases, particularly at the Ultra preset.

FAQ

Q: How does the combo perform at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The measured average frame rate is 121.6 FPS. This is a strong result, indicating smooth gameplay for most users on standard monitors.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 2560x1440?

A: At Low settings, the average FPS is 122.7, while at Ultra, it drops to 61.0. This represents a 61.7 FPS difference, showing that the Ultra preset nearly halves the frame rate compared to Low at this resolution.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 capable of 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: At 3840x2160, the measured average FPS is 45.7 on High and 32.0 on Ultra. While playable on High for some users, the Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating the card struggles to maintain high refresh rates at this resolution.

Q: Which resolution provides the best balance of quality and performance?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 on High settings yields 80.4 FPS, while 1920x1080 on High yields 121.6 FPS. The 1440p result offers a good compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate, though 1080p provides a significant FPS advantage.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X3D’s average benchmark score is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-1360P and 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, indicating near-identical overall performance in synthetic tests.

Q: What is the impact of the Medium preset at 3840x2160?

A: At Medium settings, the average FPS is 51.4. This is 5.7 FPS higher than High and 19.4 FPS higher than Ultra, making it a more viable option for 4K gameplay than the higher presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the combo scales across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high: Low achieves 191.4 FPS, Medium 150.5 FPS, High 121.6 FPS, and Ultra 91.6 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 99.8 FPS drop, indicating that the Ultra preset places substantial load on the GPU, but even the lowest result at this resolution remains well above the 60 FPS mark.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance decreases noticeably. Low settings produce 122.7 FPS, Medium 96.6 FPS, High 80.4 FPS, and Ultra 61.0 FPS. The transition from Low to Ultra here results in a 61.7 FPS reduction. The Ultra preset at this resolution is borderline for 60 Hz displays, while High remains comfortably playable.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations become evident. Low settings yield 69.2 FPS, Medium 51.4 FPS, High 45.7 FPS, and Ultra 32.0 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 37.2 FPS. Only the Low preset manages to exceed 60 FPS, while Medium and High hover in the 45–52 FPS range, and Ultra falls below 35 FPS. This resolution is clearly not the card’s strong suit, particularly at higher quality presets.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience for this combo depends on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the High preset at 121.6 FPS delivers an excellent balance, providing strong visual quality without sacrificing frame rate. Users with 144 Hz or higher refresh rate monitors could opt for Medium at 150.5 FPS, which offers a significant FPS boost with only a minor reduction in visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 91.6 FPS is also viable, but the incremental quality gain over High does not justify the 30 FPS loss.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 80.4 FPS is the recommended choice, as it offers a smooth experience for most users while maintaining solid detail levels. The Medium preset at 96.6 FPS is a better option for those prioritizing frame rate, and the Low preset at 122.7 FPS is suitable for competitive play where maximum responsiveness is key. The Ultra preset at 61.0 FPS is only recommended for users with 60 Hz displays who insist on maximum quality, as it leaves no headroom for frame rate drops.

For 3840x2160, the data suggests that the Low preset at 69.2 FPS is the only setting that consistently stays above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 51.4 FPS is a compromise, offering better visuals while remaining playable. High at 45.7 FPS and Ultra at 32.0 FPS are not recommended for a smooth experience, as they fall below the threshold for comfortable gameplay. The best overall experience for this combo is the High preset at 1920x1080, which combines high frame rates with good graphical fidelity, making it the sweet spot for most users.