Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 86 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 40 | 50 | 64 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 73 | 91 | 115 |
| 1080p Full HD | 86 | 111 | 138 | 175 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis
# Fivem with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 9060
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a playable experience in Fivem, but the data reveals a system that is clearly GPU-limited at higher resolutions while remaining solidly capable at 1080p. The combo ranks 1714th out of 3005 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. The measured frame rates show a wide spread from 31 FPS at 4K Ultra to 175 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating that settings and resolution choices dramatically alter the experience. This analysis breaks down what those numbers mean for practical gameplay.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows make it clear that Fivem responds strongly to both resolution and quality preset changes. For a balanced experience, Medium settings at 2560x1440 provide 91 FPS average with a minimum of 77 FPS, which keeps gameplay smooth during busy multiplayer moments. The 77 FPS minimum is the only recorded minimum in the dataset besides the 1080p Medium figure, so it represents a reliable floor for this configuration. At 1920x1080 Medium, the system delivers 138 FPS average with a 117 FPS minimum, making it the safest choice for high-refresh-rate monitors where sustained frame delivery matters more than peak numbers.
If visual fidelity takes priority over raw frame rate, High settings at 2560x1440 still produce a respectable 73 FPS average. This is a 20% drop from Medium at the same resolution, but the visual upgrade may justify it for players who prefer better shadows and textures. At 1080p High, the 111 FPS average remains well above the 60 FPS threshold, so High is viable for most players at that resolution. Ultra settings, however, should be avoided. The 4K Ultra result of 31 FPS is borderline unplayable, and even at 1080p Ultra the 86 FPS average comes with no recorded minimum, suggesting potential dips below comfortable levels in dense scenes.
Low settings serve a specific purpose: maximizing frame rate in competitive scenarios. The 175 FPS at 1080p Low and 115 FPS at 1440p Low show the system's headroom when graphical load is minimized. For players using 144Hz or 165Hz displays, Low at 1080p is the only preset that consistently exceeds those refresh rates. The data suggests a tiered approach: Low for competitive play, Medium for general use, High for visually oriented sessions, and Ultra only at 1080p if the visual tradeoff is acceptable. The 4K Medium result of 50 FPS is the only 4K preset that approaches playability, but the 43 FPS minimum makes it risky for fast-paced multiplayer.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 8 GB capacity is adequate for Fivem at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K Ultra result of 31 FPS suggests the card struggles with the combination of high resolution and maximum settings. The GPU's 1792 shading units and 64 ROPs provide the raw processing power, while the boost clock of 2990 MHz and game clock of 2400 MHz indicate a card designed for high-frequency operation. The data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, frame rates drop proportionally more than the pixel count increase would suggest, indicating the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.
The GPU's benchmark scores place it at the 59th percentile among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, scores 16129, a delta of -0.7%, meaning the RX 9060 is essentially on par with that card. The RX 9060 also sits close to the AMD Radeon RX 7700, which scores 15852, a 1% difference. This positioning means the GPU delivers mid-range performance that handles Fivem's lighter graphical load well at lower resolutions. The 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides ample compute for the game's DirectX 12 rendering path, and the 4 nm process node from TSMC keeps power efficiency reasonable with a 132 W TDP.
At 1080p, the GPU's role becomes less demanding. The jump from 111 FPS at High to 138 FPS at Medium shows that the card has headroom when texture and shadow loads are reduced. The 175 FPS at Low further confirms that the GPU can push very high frame rates when unburdened. However, the 4K results tell a different story. The 64 FPS at 4K Low versus 31 FPS at 4K Ultra represents a 51% drop from Low to Ultra, highlighting that the 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory bus become limiting factors at 4K. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but appears constrained at 4K with high-quality textures.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 provides 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The 65 W TDP makes it an efficient choice for gaming systems, and the 16 MB of L3 cache helps with multiplayer scenarios where many entities need to be tracked. The CPU's benchmark results show strong multithreaded performance: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and a Passmark multithread score of 24303. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1907 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3296.
The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all tested CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25517. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER at 25530 (-0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H at 25550 (-0.1% delta), indicating the 5700 performs essentially identically to those chips. The 3dmark single-thread score of 901 and the 3dmark 16-thread score of 6628 suggest the CPU can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios. Fivem, being a multiplayer modification for Grand Theft Auto V, benefits from both strong single-thread performance for game logic and decent multithreaded capability for handling multiple players and scripts.
The CPU's role in this pairing becomes evident when examining the FPS scaling. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 175 FPS, which is high enough that CPU limitations could start to appear in CPU-intensive scenes. However, the measured data shows no such bottleneck at the tested settings. The 4K results, where the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, show that the CPU maintains frame delivery even when GPU load is extreme. The Ryzen 7 5700's 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for Fivem's requirements, and the 3.70 GHz base clock ensures consistent performance in sustained gaming sessions. The CPU's DDR4 memory support with dual-channel configuration and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth pairs well with the GPU's memory architecture.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 1714th out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places the pairing in the 57th percentile of all tested combinations, which is consistent with the individual component rankings. The GPU's 59th percentile and CPU's 78th percentile suggest the combo's ranking is dragged down by the GPU's more modest position. The ranking indicates that roughly 43% of tested combinations outperform this setup in Fivem, but it also means the majority of systems tested are slower.
Looking at the component-level rivals provides context. The CPU performs nearly identically to its nearest rivals, with deltas of -0.1% to 0.3% against the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, is just 0.7% faster on average. This means the combo's ranking is not due to any single weak component but rather the overall mid-range positioning of both parts. In Fivem specifically, the measured frame rates show the combo performing as expected for its component class, with no surprises in either direction.
The rank of 1714 out of 3005 means the system is in the middle of the pack. For context, this is a solid mainstream gaming setup that will handle Fivem well at 1080p and 1440p, but it will not compete with high-end systems that feature top-tier GPUs and newer CPUs. The data suggests that players with this combo should focus on settings optimization rather than expecting maximum quality at high resolutions. The combo's position in the database reflects a balanced but not exceptional pairing, and the measured FPS confirms this assessment.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern in how this combo scales across resolutions. At 1080p High, the system delivers 111 FPS. Moving to 1440p High drops that to 73 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 4K High, the frame rate falls to 40 FPS, a further 45% reduction from 1440p. This scaling pattern is steeper than the pixel count differences alone would suggest, indicating that the GPU becomes increasingly the limiting factor as resolution rises. The 1080p to 1440p transition represents a 1.78x pixel increase but only a 1.52x frame rate decrease, while the 1440p to 4K transition represents a 2.25x pixel increase and a 1.83x frame rate decrease.
The Low settings scaling tells a similar story. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 175 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 115 FPS, a 34% reduction. At 4K Low, it hits 64 FPS, a 44% reduction from 1440p. The consistency of these percentage drops across settings presets suggests that resolution scaling is the dominant factor, with the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capabilities being the primary constraints. The Medium settings show the same pattern: 138 FPS at 1080p, 91 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K, with the 1080p to 1440p drop being 34% and the 1440p to 4K drop being 45%.
The resolution scaling analysis indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 4K, even Low settings produce only 64 FPS, which is below the 75 Hz refresh rate of many 4K monitors. The Ultra settings at 4K produce 31 FPS, which is only suitable for turn-based or slow-paced gameplay. The data strongly suggests that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a good balance between visual quality and frame rate across all settings presets. At 1440p Medium, the 91 FPS average with a 77 FPS minimum provides a consistently smooth experience, while 1440p High at 73 FPS is still very playable.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. Low settings produce 175 FPS average, which is excellent for competitive play. Medium settings yield 138 FPS average with a minimum of 117 FPS and maximum of 159 FPS, providing a very stable experience. High settings drop to 111 FPS average, still well above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings produce 86 FPS average, which is playable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes. The 1080p results show no settings preset falls below the 60 FPS mark, making this resolution the most flexible for all quality levels.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but with more variation. Low settings produce 115 FPS average, which is still excellent. Medium settings deliver 91 FPS average with a minimum of 77 FPS and maximum of 105 FPS, providing a good balance. High settings drop to 73 FPS average, which is still above 60 FPS but with less margin. Ultra settings fall to 56 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and may cause noticeable stuttering in busy areas. The 1440p data shows that Medium and Low are the recommended presets, with High being acceptable for less demanding play.
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings produce 64 FPS average, which is technically above 60 FPS but close to the edge. Medium settings deliver 50 FPS average with a minimum of 43 FPS and maximum of 58 FPS, indicating inconsistent performance. High settings drop to 40 FPS average, which is not ideal for action games. Ultra settings produce 31 FPS average, which is only suitable for screenshots or very slow gameplay. The 4K results clearly show that this combo is not designed for 4K gaming in Fivem, with only Low settings approaching playability.
The measured data points to a system that performs admirably at 1080p and 1440p but falls short at 4K. The 1080p Medium result of 138 FPS with a 117 FPS minimum is the standout figure, offering both high frame rates and stability. The 1440p Medium result of 91 FPS with a 77 FPS minimum is also excellent for players with 1440p monitors. For 4K users, the Low preset at 64 FPS is the only viable option, and even that may dip in crowded multiplayer sessions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
AMD Radeon RX 9060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 50.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 115.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 91.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 73.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 56.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 175.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 138.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 111.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 86.0 |
Fivem with Ryzen 7 5700 + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 9060 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700 + RX 9060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.