Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 produces a highly capable Fivem setup, placing in the 56th percentile of tested combinations. The data reveals a system that excels at high refresh rates at 1440p and 1080p, while 4K remains a demanding target for the most demanding presets. This analysis will break down the measured performance data, exploring the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU, and providing actionable settings recommendations based on the numbers.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. With a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, this CPU is designed for strong single-threaded performance, which is often critical for multiplayer game logic. The processor has a 65 W TDP and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache.

The processor's benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded performer. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22799 points in multicore and 3218 points in single-core tests. The Geekbench results show a single-core score of 2374 and a multicore score of 12362. The 3DMark suite further illustrates its threading capabilities: it scores 1902 with 2 threads, 3621 with 4 threads, 5372 with 8 threads, and 6376 with 16 threads, with a max-thread score of 6379. These scores show a strong scaling pattern from 2 to 8 threads, indicating that the CPU effectively utilizes its available cores for multi-threaded workloads.

The single-thread performance is particularly relevant for Fivem. In a multiplayer environment, the game server and client-side simulation of other players' actions can create a significant single-thread bottleneck. The Ryzen 5 7500F’s 3218 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 2374 Geekbench single-core score suggest it has the headroom to handle these calculations efficiently. The data supports this: at 1080p Low settings, the system achieves a very high 200 FPS average, suggesting the CPU is not the primary limiter at lower graphical loads. The 12 threads ensure that background tasks and the game's various subsystems have resources without starving the main game thread.

Compared to its nearest rivals in the benchmark database, the Ryzen 5 7500F is essentially in a dead heat. Its average benchmark score of 24964 is only 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935) and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911). It is slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F by 0.2%. This indicates that for CPU-bound scenarios, the 7500F delivers performance on par with these alternatives, making its 6-core, 12-thread configuration a solid foundation for Fivem without being a standout outlier.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a member of the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and codenamed Wheat Nas. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. Memory is a critical asset here: the card is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This large memory pool is a significant advantage for modern games, especially at higher resolutions where texture data demands are high.

The GPU's compute capabilities are robust, featuring 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 40 RT cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s, with an FP32 performance of 25.18 TFLOPS. The card has a TDP of 200 W, requires a 550 W suggested power supply, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. In benchmark tests, it scores 20974 in Passmark G3D and 106028 in Geekbench OpenCL, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution and graphical settings increase. The 16 GB VRAM buffer ensures that even at 4K Ultra settings, the card is unlikely to run out of memory, which is a common cause of stuttering and frame drops in other GPUs. The measured FPS data confirms this. At 1080p Low, the GPU is not stressed, allowing the CPU to push the frame rate to 200 FPS. However, as settings rise to Ultra at 1080p, the average FPS drops to 98, showing the GPU's increasing workload. At 4K Ultra, the system averages just 36 FPS, indicating the GPU is fully saturated at that resolution and preset.

The RX 7700’s performance relative to its benchmarks shows it is a mid-range contender. Its average benchmark score of 15852 places it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, it is 1% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014) and 1.7% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129). It is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862) and 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679). These deltas are small, suggesting the RX 7700 is a consistent performer that trades blows with its immediate competitors.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 200 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This suggests the system has significant headroom at lower graphical loads.

Q: How much of a performance drop occurs when moving from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 126 FPS at 1920x1080 to 83 FPS at 2560x1440, and further to 46 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 64% reduction in average FPS when moving from 1080p to 4K.

Q: Is 16 GB of VRAM sufficient for Fivem at 4K?

A: The data suggests yes. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, and while 4K Ultra settings yield a low 36 FPS average, the system does not show signs of memory-related stuttering in the measured rows. The bottleneck at 4K appears to be raw compute power rather than memory capacity.

Q: Which resolution provides the best balance of high frame rate and visual quality?

A: 2560x1440 at High settings provides a strong balance, with an average of 83 FPS. This is a significant jump from the 46 FPS at 4K High, while still offering a higher resolution than 1080p.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance impact Fivem?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has a Geekbench single-core score of 2374 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218. The high 200 FPS average at 1080p Low settings indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at lower resolutions, implying strong single-thread performance that is not a limiting factor.

Q: What are the minimum FPS numbers for the Medium settings preset?

A: The Medium preset has recorded minimum FPS values across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 134 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 88 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it is 49 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Fivem, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 holds the rank of 1318 out of 3005 total combinations. This places it in the 56th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than half of all other tested systems. This ranking is a holistic measure of the system's capability across all tested settings and resolutions, indicating a solid mid-to-upper tier position.

The rank suggests that while this combo is not at the absolute top tier of performance, it is a very competent setup. The CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's substantial 16 GB VRAM buffer likely contribute to this above-average standing. The 56th percentile position means there are more powerful combos available, but this system sits comfortably ahead of the median, offering a robust experience for most Fivem players. The delta between this combo and the very best is not directly shown in the data, but the rank relative to the other 3005 combos provides a clear context: it is a reliable performer that will handle the game well without being a flagship, extreme-performance build.

The ranking also implies a balance between the two components. Neither the CPU nor the GPU is severely underpowered relative to the other, which is key for consistent performance. A system with a much weaker CPU and a top-tier GPU, or vice versa, would likely see a lower rank due to bottlenecking. This combo’s performance distribution across resolutions, with good scaling from 1080p to 1440p and playable results at 4K on lower settings, supports the idea of a balanced, well-matched pairing.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

Analyzing the average FPS across resolutions reveals a clear and predictable pattern of scaling. At Low settings, the system averages 200 FPS at 1080p, 132 FPS at 1440p, and 73 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 64% drop from 1080p to 4K. This significant decrease at higher resolutions is a classic indicator that the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor as the pixel count increases.

The data shows that at 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound in many scenarios. The GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls, resulting in a 200 FPS ceiling at Low settings. As the resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU has more work to do, and the frame rate drops accordingly, showing the GPU's workload is rising. When moving to 4K, the GPU is taxed heavily, with the average FPS dropping to 73 at Low. This demonstrates that the GPU is the limiting component at 4K, as the CPU has fewer frames to prepare, and the rendering pipeline becomes the bottleneck.

The scaling pattern is similar for High and Ultra settings. For High, the drop is from 126 FPS at 1080p to 83 FPS at 1440p (a 34% drop) and then to 46 FPS at 4K (a 64% drop from 1080p). For Ultra, the numbers are 98 FPS at 1080p, 65 FPS at 1440p, and 36 FPS at 4K. The consistent percentage drops across preset levels indicate that resolution is the dominant factor in performance scaling, not the specific graphical settings. The limiting component shifts from the CPU at 1080p to the GPU at 4K, with 1440p representing a balanced middle ground where both components share the workload.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's performance.

At 3840x2160 (4K):

• Low settings: 73 FPS average.
• Medium settings: 58 FPS average, with a minimum of 49 and a maximum of 66.
• High settings: 46 FPS average.
• Ultra settings: 36 FPS average.

At 2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low settings: 132 FPS average.
• Medium settings: 104 FPS average, with a minimum of 88 and a maximum of 120.
• High settings: 83 FPS average.
• Ultra settings: 65 FPS average.

At 1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low settings: 200 FPS average.
• Medium settings: 158 FPS average, with a minimum of 134 and a maximum of 182.
• High settings: 126 FPS average.
• Ultra settings: 98 FPS average.

Minimum and maximum FPS values are only provided for the Medium preset across all resolutions. This data shows that the frame pacing is consistently stable, with a 48 FPS spread between the minimum and maximum at 1080p (134 to 182), a 32 FPS spread at 1440p (88 to 120), and a 17 FPS spread at 4K (49 to 66). This indicates that the Medium preset offers a smooth experience without major frame-time spikes. For other presets, only the average FPS is available, which still provides a clear trend of decreasing performance as settings and resolution increase.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The data suggests that the Medium preset at 2560x1440 offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance for this combo. It achieves an average of 104 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and the framerate is stable, with a minimum of 88 FPS. This is a significant improvement over the High preset at the same resolution, which drops to 83 FPS, and it provides a much higher resolution than the 1080p Medium preset, which hits 158 FPS. The 104 FPS at 1440p Medium offers a sharp image with a high refresh rate experience.

For players who prioritize maximum frame rates for competitive play, the 1080p Low preset is the clear choice, delivering a 200 FPS average. This will maximize responsiveness and minimize input lag, making it ideal for fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. However, the visual quality will be noticeably reduced. Alternatively, the 1080p Medium preset at 158 FPS offers a substantial visual upgrade over Low while still maintaining a very high frame rate, making it an excellent choice for those with high-refresh-rate 1080p monitors.

For players with 4K displays, the data shows that this combo is best suited for Low or Medium settings. The 4K Low preset provides a playable 73 FPS average, while 4K Medium drops to 58 FPS, which is still acceptable for many titles. The High and Ultra presets at 4K fall below 50 FPS, which is generally considered less than ideal for a smooth experience. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong asset here, ensuring that even at 4K Medium, the system is not stuttering due to memory limitations. The recommendation is to use 1440p Medium for the optimal experience, with 1080p Medium as a strong alternative for higher frame rates, and 4K only with Low or Medium settings for a playable experience.