Control

# Control with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + AMD Radeon RX 7700

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a broadly capable Control experience, with measured frame rates ranging from 41 FPS at 4K Ultra to 148 FPS at 1080p Low. The data reveals a system where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures headroom at lower settings. This combination ranks 1294th out of 2888 tested combos for Control, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the benchmark database.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 93 FPS at 1080p to 71 FPS at 1440p, then further to 48 FPS at 4K. This represents a 24% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 48% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is not perfectly linear, suggesting that the RX 7700's rendering workload grows faster than pixel count alone would predict, likely due to increased shading and texture work at higher resolutions.

The Low settings row demonstrates even steeper scaling. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 148 FPS, which drops to 112 FPS at 1440p and 76 FPS at 4K. The 1080p-to-4K reduction here is 49%, nearly identical to the High preset's 48% drop. This consistency across settings presets indicates that the resolution penalty is primarily a GPU-bound phenomenon, not a settings-dependent interaction. When the CPU is less stressed at Low settings, the GPU still cannot maintain proportionally higher frame rates at 4K, confirming that pixel throughput is the bottleneck.

Medium settings provide the most complete data with min and max FPS values recorded. At 1080p Medium, the system averages 105 FPS with a range of 89 to 121 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average falls to 80 FPS with a range of 68 to 92 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average drops to 54 FPS with a range of 46 to 62 FPS. The min-to-max spread narrows slightly as resolution increases, from 32 FPS at 1080p to 24 FPS at 1440p and 16 FPS at 4K. This tightening range suggests that at lower resolutions, CPU-side frame time variance contributes more to the overall FPS fluctuation, while at 4K the GPU's consistent workload dominates the frame pacing.

The limiting component analysis points squarely at the GPU for 4K operation. At 4K Ultra, the system produces only 41 FPS, which is 50% below the 1080p High result of 93 FPS. The RX 7700, with its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth, has ample memory resources, but the raw compute throughput of 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 appears insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K with Ultra settings. Conversely, at 1080p Low, the 148 FPS result approaches the practical ceiling for many displays, and the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock provides enough single-thread performance to avoid becoming a constraint.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Control?

A: The highest measured average is 148 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next highest is 112 FPS at 2560x1440 Low, followed by 105 FPS at 1920x1080 Medium.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K?

A: No. The only 4K result above 60 FPS is Low settings at 76 FPS average. At Medium settings, the average is 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS, while High averages 48 FPS and Ultra averages 41 FPS. None of the higher preset levels reach 60 FPS at 3840x2160.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, which places it 0.1% below the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862, 1% below the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at 16014, 1.1% above the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15679, and 1.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129. The percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 58.

Q: What is the CPU's performance position relative to competitors?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, placing it 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-11850H at 24935, 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F at 25005, 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-13620H at 24911, and 0.4% above the Intel Core 5 210H at 24872. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 77.

Q: Does increasing settings from Low to Ultra have a consistent FPS impact across resolutions?

A: The relative penalty is similar. At 1080p, Ultra (81 FPS) is 45% below Low (148 FPS). At 1440p, Ultra (61 FPS) is 46% below Low (112 FPS). At 4K, Ultra (41 FPS) is 46% below Low (76 FPS). The consistency suggests the settings scaling is uniform across resolutions.

Q: What is the best resolution for smooth gameplay?

A: For 60+ FPS averages, 1080p works at all settings (Low 148, Medium 105, High 93, Ultra 81 FPS). At 1440p, Low (112 FPS) and Medium (80 FPS) exceed 60 FPS, but High (71 FPS) and Ultra (61 FPS) barely do. At 4K, only Low (76 FPS) reaches 60 FPS.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The memory subsystem comprises 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1900 MHz, with a game clock of 2041 MHz and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. Memory operates at 2438 MHz with 19.5 Gbps effective throughput.

In Control, the GPU's memory capacity of 16 GB is unlikely to be a limiting factor, as the game's texture requirements at 4K Ultra would need to exceed that threshold to cause spilling. The bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s provides adequate headroom for the measured frame rates. The pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s define the theoretical fill limits, and the 96 ROPs handle final pixel output. The 40 ray tracing cores and 2560 shading units contribute to the compute load, though Control's implementation of ray tracing is not separately measured in this dataset.

The benchmark results show the GPU's percentile ranking at 58 versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Comparing to nearest rivals, the RX 7700 sits within 1.7% of the RTX 3060 Ti in aggregate benchmarks, but the measured Control FPS data indicates that the card's real-world performance is more nuanced. The 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS is particularly telling — this is a demanding scenario that stresses the GPU's compute and memory subsystems simultaneously. The 16 GB frame buffer does not prevent the performance drop, confirming that compute throughput, not memory capacity, is the binding constraint at 4K.

At lower resolutions, the GPU's boost clock of 2459 MHz becomes more relevant. At 1080p Low, the 148 FPS result suggests the card can feed frames quickly when pixel count is low, but the 49% drop to 76 FPS at 4K Low indicates that raw pixel fill becomes the challenge. The GDDR6 memory at 19.5 Gbps effective provides sufficient bandwidth for the lower-resolution scenarios, where the bottleneck shifts toward the CPU and driver overhead.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data allows for a data-driven recommendation based on target frame rates. For 60 FPS gameplay, the optimal preset depends on resolution. At 1080p, all four settings presets deliver above 60 FPS on average: Low at 148 FPS, Medium at 105 FPS, High at 93 FPS, and Ultra at 81 FPS. The High preset at 1080p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with 93 FPS providing a comfortable margin above 60 FPS and nearly 40% more headroom than Ultra's 81 FPS.

At 1440p, the choice becomes more constrained. Low at 112 FPS and Medium at 80 FPS both exceed 60 FPS comfortably, while High at 71 FPS still clears the threshold with a narrow margin. Ultra at 61 FPS barely averages above 60 FPS, leaving little room for frame time spikes. The Medium preset at 1440p, with its measured min of 68 FPS and max of 92 FPS, offers the most consistent experience above 60 FPS while providing better visual fidelity than Low.

For 4K, only the Low preset at 76 FPS average delivers a playable experience above 60 FPS. Medium at 54 FPS, High at 48 FPS, and Ultra at 41 FPS all fall short. If 4K is the target resolution, the Low preset is the only viable option based on the measured data. The Medium preset at 4K has a minimum of 46 FPS, which may introduce noticeable stutter in fast-paced action sequences.

The best overall experience per the measured rows is the 1440p Medium configuration. It provides an 80 FPS average with a 68 to 92 FPS range, delivering both visual quality improvements over Low and a more stable frame rate than High or Ultra at that resolution. The 68 FPS minimum ensures that even demanding scenes stay above 60 FPS, making this the recommended combination for a smooth Control experience.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 ranks 1294th out of 2888 tested combos for Control, placing it in the 55th percentile of all combinations in the database. The rank reflects the system's position relative to a wide field of CPU-GPU pairings, including both more powerful and less capable configurations. The 1294th position indicates that roughly 44% of tested combos outperform this setup in Control, while 55% fall below it.

The ranking is influenced by both components. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking versus all CPUs suggests the Ryzen 5 7500F is a strong performer in general compute tasks, but the GPU's 58th percentile ranking pulls the overall combo down. In a game like Control, where GPU load scales heavily with resolution and settings, the RX 7700's mid-tier positioning becomes the determining factor for the combo's final rank.

The nearest CPU rivals — the Intel Core i7-11850H, AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, Intel Core i7-13620H, and Intel Core 5 210H — all have average benchmark scores within 0.4% of the Ryzen 5 7500F. This tight clustering means that CPU choice among these options would have minimal impact on the Control results. The GPU rivals, including the RTX 3060 Ti at 1.7% higher average score, are similarly close, suggesting that the combo's rank is stable across minor hardware variations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 148 FPS, which serves as the ceiling for this combo. Medium settings average 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS. High settings average 93 FPS, while Ultra settings average 81 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 67 FPS, a 45% reduction that demonstrates the performance cost of maxing out visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates step down noticeably. Low settings average 112 FPS, still well above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 80 FPS with a range of 68 to 92 FPS. High settings average 71 FPS, and Ultra settings average 61 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 68 FPS is the only sub-60 result at 1440p, and it occurs only in the most demanding scenes. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 51 FPS reduction, or 46%, mirroring the 1080p scaling pattern.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings average 76 FPS, the only 4K preset above 60 FPS. Medium settings average 54 FPS with a minimum of 46 FPS and maximum of 62 FPS. High settings average 48 FPS, and Ultra settings average 41 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K represents the worst-case scenario for this combo, delivering less than half the frame rate of the 1080p Low configuration. The 4K Medium min of 46 FPS highlights the challenge of maintaining smooth gameplay at this resolution.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 65 watts. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.

In Control, the CPU's role shifts depending on resolution and settings. At 1080p Low, where the GPU has less work per frame, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more critical. The 5.00 GHz boost clock and 3218 Cinebench R23 single-core score help sustain the 148 FPS average. The 3dmark single-thread score of 974 and 2-thread score of 1902 indicate strong per-core performance, which is essential for games that rely on a few heavily loaded threads.

At 4K Ultra, the CPU's workload per frame is relatively lighter compared to the GPU's massive rendering burden. The 41 FPS result at 4K Ultra is GPU-limited, and the CPU's 12 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The multi-threaded scores — 6376 in 3dmark 16-thread, 22799 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 26825 in Passmark multithread — demonstrate that the CPU has ample headroom for background tasks and game logic even when the GPU is saturated.

The CPU's 77th percentile ranking versus all CPUs and its average benchmark score of 24964 place it slightly above the Intel Core i7-11850H (0.1%), Intel Core i7-13620H (0.2%), and Intel Core 5 210H (0.4%), while falling 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F. These differences are negligible in gaming scenarios, and the measured Control FPS data reflects this, with the combo's performance being primarily dictated by the GPU across most settings and resolutions. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are adequate for Control's threading model, and the 32 MB of L3 cache helps with data locality for game assets.